Cargando…
The Sexual Risk Context among the FEM-PrEP Study Population in Bondo, Kenya and Pretoria, South Africa
BACKGROUND: Incidence rates in the FEM-PrEP and VOICE trials demonstrate that women from diverse sub-Saharan African communities continue to be at substantial HIV risk. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the sexual risk context of the study population from two FEM-PrEP trial sites–Bondo, Kenya, and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25229403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106410 |
_version_ | 1782335440189128704 |
---|---|
author | Headley, Jennifer Lemons, Ansley Corneli, Amy Agot, Kawango Ahmed, Khatija Wang, Meng Odhiambo, Jacob Skhosana, Joseph Tharaldson, Jenae Van Damme, Lut MacQueen, Kathleen |
author_facet | Headley, Jennifer Lemons, Ansley Corneli, Amy Agot, Kawango Ahmed, Khatija Wang, Meng Odhiambo, Jacob Skhosana, Joseph Tharaldson, Jenae Van Damme, Lut MacQueen, Kathleen |
author_sort | Headley, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Incidence rates in the FEM-PrEP and VOICE trials demonstrate that women from diverse sub-Saharan African communities continue to be at substantial HIV risk. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the sexual risk context of the study population from two FEM-PrEP trial sites–Bondo, Kenya, and Pretoria, South Africa. METHODS: At baseline we collected information about demographics, sexual behaviors, and partnership beliefs through quantitative questionnaires with all participants (Bondo, n = 720; Pretoria, n = 750). To explore the sexual risk context, we also conducted qualitative, semi-structured interviews with HIV-negative participants randomly selected at several time points (Bondo, n = 111; Pretoria, n = 69). RESULTS: Demographics, sexual behavior, and partnership beliefs varied significantly between the sites. Bondo participants were generally older, had fewer years of schooling, and were more likely to be employed and married compared to Pretoria participants. Bondo participants were more likely to report multiple partners and not knowing whether their partner had HIV than Pretoria participants. A significantly higher percentage of Bondo participants reported engaging in sex without a condom with their primary and other partners compared to Pretoria participants. We found a borderline association between participants who reported not using condoms in the 4 weeks prior to baseline and lower risk of HIV infection, and no association between having more than one sexual partner at baseline and HIV infection. DISCUSSION: Despite significantly different demographics, sexual behaviors, and partnership beliefs, many women in the FEM-PrEP trial were at risk of acquiring HIV as demonstrated by the sites’ high HIV incidence. Though gender dynamics differed between the populations, they appear to play a critical role in women’s sexual practices. The findings highlight different ways women from diverse contexts may be at-risk for HIV and the importance of providing HIV prevention options that are both effective and feasible given personal and social circumstances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4167553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41675532014-09-22 The Sexual Risk Context among the FEM-PrEP Study Population in Bondo, Kenya and Pretoria, South Africa Headley, Jennifer Lemons, Ansley Corneli, Amy Agot, Kawango Ahmed, Khatija Wang, Meng Odhiambo, Jacob Skhosana, Joseph Tharaldson, Jenae Van Damme, Lut MacQueen, Kathleen PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Incidence rates in the FEM-PrEP and VOICE trials demonstrate that women from diverse sub-Saharan African communities continue to be at substantial HIV risk. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the sexual risk context of the study population from two FEM-PrEP trial sites–Bondo, Kenya, and Pretoria, South Africa. METHODS: At baseline we collected information about demographics, sexual behaviors, and partnership beliefs through quantitative questionnaires with all participants (Bondo, n = 720; Pretoria, n = 750). To explore the sexual risk context, we also conducted qualitative, semi-structured interviews with HIV-negative participants randomly selected at several time points (Bondo, n = 111; Pretoria, n = 69). RESULTS: Demographics, sexual behavior, and partnership beliefs varied significantly between the sites. Bondo participants were generally older, had fewer years of schooling, and were more likely to be employed and married compared to Pretoria participants. Bondo participants were more likely to report multiple partners and not knowing whether their partner had HIV than Pretoria participants. A significantly higher percentage of Bondo participants reported engaging in sex without a condom with their primary and other partners compared to Pretoria participants. We found a borderline association between participants who reported not using condoms in the 4 weeks prior to baseline and lower risk of HIV infection, and no association between having more than one sexual partner at baseline and HIV infection. DISCUSSION: Despite significantly different demographics, sexual behaviors, and partnership beliefs, many women in the FEM-PrEP trial were at risk of acquiring HIV as demonstrated by the sites’ high HIV incidence. Though gender dynamics differed between the populations, they appear to play a critical role in women’s sexual practices. The findings highlight different ways women from diverse contexts may be at-risk for HIV and the importance of providing HIV prevention options that are both effective and feasible given personal and social circumstances. Public Library of Science 2014-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4167553/ /pubmed/25229403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106410 Text en © 2014 Headley et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Headley, Jennifer Lemons, Ansley Corneli, Amy Agot, Kawango Ahmed, Khatija Wang, Meng Odhiambo, Jacob Skhosana, Joseph Tharaldson, Jenae Van Damme, Lut MacQueen, Kathleen The Sexual Risk Context among the FEM-PrEP Study Population in Bondo, Kenya and Pretoria, South Africa |
title | The Sexual Risk Context among the FEM-PrEP Study Population in Bondo, Kenya and Pretoria, South Africa |
title_full | The Sexual Risk Context among the FEM-PrEP Study Population in Bondo, Kenya and Pretoria, South Africa |
title_fullStr | The Sexual Risk Context among the FEM-PrEP Study Population in Bondo, Kenya and Pretoria, South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | The Sexual Risk Context among the FEM-PrEP Study Population in Bondo, Kenya and Pretoria, South Africa |
title_short | The Sexual Risk Context among the FEM-PrEP Study Population in Bondo, Kenya and Pretoria, South Africa |
title_sort | sexual risk context among the fem-prep study population in bondo, kenya and pretoria, south africa |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25229403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106410 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT headleyjennifer thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT lemonsansley thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT corneliamy thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT agotkawango thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT ahmedkhatija thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT wangmeng thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT odhiambojacob thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT skhosanajoseph thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT tharaldsonjenae thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT vandammelut thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT macqueenkathleen thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT headleyjennifer sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT lemonsansley sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT corneliamy sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT agotkawango sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT ahmedkhatija sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT wangmeng sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT odhiambojacob sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT skhosanajoseph sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT tharaldsonjenae sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT vandammelut sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT macqueenkathleen sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica AT sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica |