Cargando…

The Sexual Risk Context among the FEM-PrEP Study Population in Bondo, Kenya and Pretoria, South Africa

BACKGROUND: Incidence rates in the FEM-PrEP and VOICE trials demonstrate that women from diverse sub-Saharan African communities continue to be at substantial HIV risk. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the sexual risk context of the study population from two FEM-PrEP trial sites–Bondo, Kenya, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Headley, Jennifer, Lemons, Ansley, Corneli, Amy, Agot, Kawango, Ahmed, Khatija, Wang, Meng, Odhiambo, Jacob, Skhosana, Joseph, Tharaldson, Jenae, Van Damme, Lut, MacQueen, Kathleen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25229403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106410
_version_ 1782335440189128704
author Headley, Jennifer
Lemons, Ansley
Corneli, Amy
Agot, Kawango
Ahmed, Khatija
Wang, Meng
Odhiambo, Jacob
Skhosana, Joseph
Tharaldson, Jenae
Van Damme, Lut
MacQueen, Kathleen
author_facet Headley, Jennifer
Lemons, Ansley
Corneli, Amy
Agot, Kawango
Ahmed, Khatija
Wang, Meng
Odhiambo, Jacob
Skhosana, Joseph
Tharaldson, Jenae
Van Damme, Lut
MacQueen, Kathleen
author_sort Headley, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Incidence rates in the FEM-PrEP and VOICE trials demonstrate that women from diverse sub-Saharan African communities continue to be at substantial HIV risk. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the sexual risk context of the study population from two FEM-PrEP trial sites–Bondo, Kenya, and Pretoria, South Africa. METHODS: At baseline we collected information about demographics, sexual behaviors, and partnership beliefs through quantitative questionnaires with all participants (Bondo, n = 720; Pretoria, n = 750). To explore the sexual risk context, we also conducted qualitative, semi-structured interviews with HIV-negative participants randomly selected at several time points (Bondo, n = 111; Pretoria, n = 69). RESULTS: Demographics, sexual behavior, and partnership beliefs varied significantly between the sites. Bondo participants were generally older, had fewer years of schooling, and were more likely to be employed and married compared to Pretoria participants. Bondo participants were more likely to report multiple partners and not knowing whether their partner had HIV than Pretoria participants. A significantly higher percentage of Bondo participants reported engaging in sex without a condom with their primary and other partners compared to Pretoria participants. We found a borderline association between participants who reported not using condoms in the 4 weeks prior to baseline and lower risk of HIV infection, and no association between having more than one sexual partner at baseline and HIV infection. DISCUSSION: Despite significantly different demographics, sexual behaviors, and partnership beliefs, many women in the FEM-PrEP trial were at risk of acquiring HIV as demonstrated by the sites’ high HIV incidence. Though gender dynamics differed between the populations, they appear to play a critical role in women’s sexual practices. The findings highlight different ways women from diverse contexts may be at-risk for HIV and the importance of providing HIV prevention options that are both effective and feasible given personal and social circumstances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4167553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41675532014-09-22 The Sexual Risk Context among the FEM-PrEP Study Population in Bondo, Kenya and Pretoria, South Africa Headley, Jennifer Lemons, Ansley Corneli, Amy Agot, Kawango Ahmed, Khatija Wang, Meng Odhiambo, Jacob Skhosana, Joseph Tharaldson, Jenae Van Damme, Lut MacQueen, Kathleen PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Incidence rates in the FEM-PrEP and VOICE trials demonstrate that women from diverse sub-Saharan African communities continue to be at substantial HIV risk. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the sexual risk context of the study population from two FEM-PrEP trial sites–Bondo, Kenya, and Pretoria, South Africa. METHODS: At baseline we collected information about demographics, sexual behaviors, and partnership beliefs through quantitative questionnaires with all participants (Bondo, n = 720; Pretoria, n = 750). To explore the sexual risk context, we also conducted qualitative, semi-structured interviews with HIV-negative participants randomly selected at several time points (Bondo, n = 111; Pretoria, n = 69). RESULTS: Demographics, sexual behavior, and partnership beliefs varied significantly between the sites. Bondo participants were generally older, had fewer years of schooling, and were more likely to be employed and married compared to Pretoria participants. Bondo participants were more likely to report multiple partners and not knowing whether their partner had HIV than Pretoria participants. A significantly higher percentage of Bondo participants reported engaging in sex without a condom with their primary and other partners compared to Pretoria participants. We found a borderline association between participants who reported not using condoms in the 4 weeks prior to baseline and lower risk of HIV infection, and no association between having more than one sexual partner at baseline and HIV infection. DISCUSSION: Despite significantly different demographics, sexual behaviors, and partnership beliefs, many women in the FEM-PrEP trial were at risk of acquiring HIV as demonstrated by the sites’ high HIV incidence. Though gender dynamics differed between the populations, they appear to play a critical role in women’s sexual practices. The findings highlight different ways women from diverse contexts may be at-risk for HIV and the importance of providing HIV prevention options that are both effective and feasible given personal and social circumstances. Public Library of Science 2014-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4167553/ /pubmed/25229403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106410 Text en © 2014 Headley et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Headley, Jennifer
Lemons, Ansley
Corneli, Amy
Agot, Kawango
Ahmed, Khatija
Wang, Meng
Odhiambo, Jacob
Skhosana, Joseph
Tharaldson, Jenae
Van Damme, Lut
MacQueen, Kathleen
The Sexual Risk Context among the FEM-PrEP Study Population in Bondo, Kenya and Pretoria, South Africa
title The Sexual Risk Context among the FEM-PrEP Study Population in Bondo, Kenya and Pretoria, South Africa
title_full The Sexual Risk Context among the FEM-PrEP Study Population in Bondo, Kenya and Pretoria, South Africa
title_fullStr The Sexual Risk Context among the FEM-PrEP Study Population in Bondo, Kenya and Pretoria, South Africa
title_full_unstemmed The Sexual Risk Context among the FEM-PrEP Study Population in Bondo, Kenya and Pretoria, South Africa
title_short The Sexual Risk Context among the FEM-PrEP Study Population in Bondo, Kenya and Pretoria, South Africa
title_sort sexual risk context among the fem-prep study population in bondo, kenya and pretoria, south africa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25229403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106410
work_keys_str_mv AT headleyjennifer thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT lemonsansley thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT corneliamy thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT agotkawango thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT ahmedkhatija thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT wangmeng thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT odhiambojacob thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT skhosanajoseph thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT tharaldsonjenae thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT vandammelut thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT macqueenkathleen thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT thesexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT headleyjennifer sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT lemonsansley sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT corneliamy sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT agotkawango sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT ahmedkhatija sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT wangmeng sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT odhiambojacob sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT skhosanajoseph sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT tharaldsonjenae sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT vandammelut sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT macqueenkathleen sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica
AT sexualriskcontextamongthefemprepstudypopulationinbondokenyaandpretoriasouthafrica