Cargando…
Extent of Surgery and Implications of Transection Margin Status after Resection of IPMNs
Appropriate surgical strategies for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas are a matter of debate. Preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of malignant potential of IPMN and of patient's comorbidities is of paramount importance to balance potential com...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/269803 |
_version_ | 1782335452333735936 |
---|---|
author | Paini, Marina Crippa, Stefano Scopelliti, Filippo Baldoni, Andrea Manzoni, Alberto Belfiori, Giulio Partelli, Stefano Falconi, Massimo |
author_facet | Paini, Marina Crippa, Stefano Scopelliti, Filippo Baldoni, Andrea Manzoni, Alberto Belfiori, Giulio Partelli, Stefano Falconi, Massimo |
author_sort | Paini, Marina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Appropriate surgical strategies for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas are a matter of debate. Preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of malignant potential of IPMN and of patient's comorbidities is of paramount importance to balance potential complications of surgery with tumors' risk of being or becoming malignant; the decision about the extent of pancreatic resection and the eventual total pancreatectomy needs to be determined on individual basis. The analysis of frozen-section margin of pancreas during operation is mandatory. The goal should be the complete resection of IPMN reaching negative margin, although there is still no agreed definition of “negative margin.” Of note, the presence of deepithelization is often wrongly interpreted as absence of neoplasia. Management of resection margin status and stratification of surveillance of the remnant pancreas, based on characteristics of primary tumour, are of crucial importance in the management of IPMNs in order to decrease the risk of tumor recurrence after resection. Although risk of local and distant recurrence for invasive IPMNs is increased even in case of total pancreatectomy, also local recurrence after complete resection of noninvasive IPMNs is not negligible. Therefore, a long-term/life-time follow-up monitoring is of paramount importance to detect eventual recurrences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4167807 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41678072014-09-28 Extent of Surgery and Implications of Transection Margin Status after Resection of IPMNs Paini, Marina Crippa, Stefano Scopelliti, Filippo Baldoni, Andrea Manzoni, Alberto Belfiori, Giulio Partelli, Stefano Falconi, Massimo Gastroenterol Res Pract Review Article Appropriate surgical strategies for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas are a matter of debate. Preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of malignant potential of IPMN and of patient's comorbidities is of paramount importance to balance potential complications of surgery with tumors' risk of being or becoming malignant; the decision about the extent of pancreatic resection and the eventual total pancreatectomy needs to be determined on individual basis. The analysis of frozen-section margin of pancreas during operation is mandatory. The goal should be the complete resection of IPMN reaching negative margin, although there is still no agreed definition of “negative margin.” Of note, the presence of deepithelization is often wrongly interpreted as absence of neoplasia. Management of resection margin status and stratification of surveillance of the remnant pancreas, based on characteristics of primary tumour, are of crucial importance in the management of IPMNs in order to decrease the risk of tumor recurrence after resection. Although risk of local and distant recurrence for invasive IPMNs is increased even in case of total pancreatectomy, also local recurrence after complete resection of noninvasive IPMNs is not negligible. Therefore, a long-term/life-time follow-up monitoring is of paramount importance to detect eventual recurrences. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4167807/ /pubmed/25276122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/269803 Text en Copyright © 2014 Marina Paini et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Paini, Marina Crippa, Stefano Scopelliti, Filippo Baldoni, Andrea Manzoni, Alberto Belfiori, Giulio Partelli, Stefano Falconi, Massimo Extent of Surgery and Implications of Transection Margin Status after Resection of IPMNs |
title | Extent of Surgery and Implications of Transection Margin Status after Resection of IPMNs |
title_full | Extent of Surgery and Implications of Transection Margin Status after Resection of IPMNs |
title_fullStr | Extent of Surgery and Implications of Transection Margin Status after Resection of IPMNs |
title_full_unstemmed | Extent of Surgery and Implications of Transection Margin Status after Resection of IPMNs |
title_short | Extent of Surgery and Implications of Transection Margin Status after Resection of IPMNs |
title_sort | extent of surgery and implications of transection margin status after resection of ipmns |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4167807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/269803 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT painimarina extentofsurgeryandimplicationsoftransectionmarginstatusafterresectionofipmns AT crippastefano extentofsurgeryandimplicationsoftransectionmarginstatusafterresectionofipmns AT scopellitifilippo extentofsurgeryandimplicationsoftransectionmarginstatusafterresectionofipmns AT baldoniandrea extentofsurgeryandimplicationsoftransectionmarginstatusafterresectionofipmns AT manzonialberto extentofsurgeryandimplicationsoftransectionmarginstatusafterresectionofipmns AT belfiorigiulio extentofsurgeryandimplicationsoftransectionmarginstatusafterresectionofipmns AT partellistefano extentofsurgeryandimplicationsoftransectionmarginstatusafterresectionofipmns AT falconimassimo extentofsurgeryandimplicationsoftransectionmarginstatusafterresectionofipmns |