Cargando…
Electroacoustic Stimulation: Now and into the Future
Cochlear implants have provided hearing to hundreds of thousands of profoundly deaf people around the world. Recently, the eligibility criteria for cochlear implantation have been relaxed to include individuals who have some useful residual hearing. These recipients receive inputs from both electric...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/350504 |
_version_ | 1782335475932987392 |
---|---|
author | Irving, S. Gillespie, L. Richardson, R. Rowe, D. Fallon, J. B. Wise, A. K. |
author_facet | Irving, S. Gillespie, L. Richardson, R. Rowe, D. Fallon, J. B. Wise, A. K. |
author_sort | Irving, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cochlear implants have provided hearing to hundreds of thousands of profoundly deaf people around the world. Recently, the eligibility criteria for cochlear implantation have been relaxed to include individuals who have some useful residual hearing. These recipients receive inputs from both electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS). Implant recipients who can combine these hearing modalities demonstrate pronounced benefit in speech perception, listening in background noise, and music appreciation over implant recipients that rely on electrical stimulation alone. The mechanisms bestowing this benefit are unknown, but it is likely that interaction of the electric and acoustic signals in the auditory pathway plays a role. Protection of residual hearing both during and following cochlear implantation is critical for EAS. A number of surgical refinements have been implemented to protect residual hearing, and the development of hearing-protective drug and gene therapies is promising for EAS recipients. This review outlines the current field of EAS, with a focus on interactions that are observed between these modalities in animal models. It also outlines current trends in EAS surgery and gives an overview of the drug and gene therapies that are clinically translatable and may one day provide protection of residual hearing for cochlear implant recipients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4168031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41680312014-09-28 Electroacoustic Stimulation: Now and into the Future Irving, S. Gillespie, L. Richardson, R. Rowe, D. Fallon, J. B. Wise, A. K. Biomed Res Int Review Article Cochlear implants have provided hearing to hundreds of thousands of profoundly deaf people around the world. Recently, the eligibility criteria for cochlear implantation have been relaxed to include individuals who have some useful residual hearing. These recipients receive inputs from both electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS). Implant recipients who can combine these hearing modalities demonstrate pronounced benefit in speech perception, listening in background noise, and music appreciation over implant recipients that rely on electrical stimulation alone. The mechanisms bestowing this benefit are unknown, but it is likely that interaction of the electric and acoustic signals in the auditory pathway plays a role. Protection of residual hearing both during and following cochlear implantation is critical for EAS. A number of surgical refinements have been implemented to protect residual hearing, and the development of hearing-protective drug and gene therapies is promising for EAS recipients. This review outlines the current field of EAS, with a focus on interactions that are observed between these modalities in animal models. It also outlines current trends in EAS surgery and gives an overview of the drug and gene therapies that are clinically translatable and may one day provide protection of residual hearing for cochlear implant recipients. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4168031/ /pubmed/25276779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/350504 Text en Copyright © 2014 S. Irving et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Irving, S. Gillespie, L. Richardson, R. Rowe, D. Fallon, J. B. Wise, A. K. Electroacoustic Stimulation: Now and into the Future |
title | Electroacoustic Stimulation: Now and into the Future |
title_full | Electroacoustic Stimulation: Now and into the Future |
title_fullStr | Electroacoustic Stimulation: Now and into the Future |
title_full_unstemmed | Electroacoustic Stimulation: Now and into the Future |
title_short | Electroacoustic Stimulation: Now and into the Future |
title_sort | electroacoustic stimulation: now and into the future |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/350504 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT irvings electroacousticstimulationnowandintothefuture AT gillespiel electroacousticstimulationnowandintothefuture AT richardsonr electroacousticstimulationnowandintothefuture AT rowed electroacousticstimulationnowandintothefuture AT fallonjb electroacousticstimulationnowandintothefuture AT wiseak electroacousticstimulationnowandintothefuture |