Cargando…

Methods to estimate breeding values in honey bees

BACKGROUND: Efficient methodologies based on animal models are widely used to estimate breeding values in farm animals. These methods are not applicable in honey bees because of their mode of reproduction. Observations are recorded on colonies, which consist of a single queen and thousands of worker...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brascamp, Evert W, Bijma, Piter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25237934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-014-0053-9
_version_ 1782335510509780992
author Brascamp, Evert W
Bijma, Piter
author_facet Brascamp, Evert W
Bijma, Piter
author_sort Brascamp, Evert W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Efficient methodologies based on animal models are widely used to estimate breeding values in farm animals. These methods are not applicable in honey bees because of their mode of reproduction. Observations are recorded on colonies, which consist of a single queen and thousands of workers that descended from the queen mated to 10 to 20 drones. Drones are haploid and sperms are copies of a drone’s genotype. As a consequence, Mendelian sampling terms of full-sibs are correlated, such that the covariance matrix of Mendelian sampling terms is not diagonal. RESULTS: In this paper, we show how the numerator relationship matrix and its inverse can be obtained for honey bee populations. We present algorithms to derive the covariance matrix of Mendelian sampling terms that accounts for correlated terms. The resulting matrix is a block-diagonal matrix, with a small block for each full-sib family, and is easy to invert numerically. The method allows incorporating the within-colony distribution of progeny from drone-producing queens and drones, such that estimates of breeding values weigh information from relatives appropriately. Simulation shows that the resulting estimated breeding values are unbiased predictors of true breeding values. Benefits for response to selection, compared to an existing approximate method, appear to be limited (~5%). Benefits may however be greater when estimating genetic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: This work shows how the relationship matrix and its inverse can be developed for honey bee populations, and used to estimate breeding values and variance components.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4168193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41681932014-10-02 Methods to estimate breeding values in honey bees Brascamp, Evert W Bijma, Piter Genet Sel Evol Research BACKGROUND: Efficient methodologies based on animal models are widely used to estimate breeding values in farm animals. These methods are not applicable in honey bees because of their mode of reproduction. Observations are recorded on colonies, which consist of a single queen and thousands of workers that descended from the queen mated to 10 to 20 drones. Drones are haploid and sperms are copies of a drone’s genotype. As a consequence, Mendelian sampling terms of full-sibs are correlated, such that the covariance matrix of Mendelian sampling terms is not diagonal. RESULTS: In this paper, we show how the numerator relationship matrix and its inverse can be obtained for honey bee populations. We present algorithms to derive the covariance matrix of Mendelian sampling terms that accounts for correlated terms. The resulting matrix is a block-diagonal matrix, with a small block for each full-sib family, and is easy to invert numerically. The method allows incorporating the within-colony distribution of progeny from drone-producing queens and drones, such that estimates of breeding values weigh information from relatives appropriately. Simulation shows that the resulting estimated breeding values are unbiased predictors of true breeding values. Benefits for response to selection, compared to an existing approximate method, appear to be limited (~5%). Benefits may however be greater when estimating genetic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: This work shows how the relationship matrix and its inverse can be developed for honey bee populations, and used to estimate breeding values and variance components. BioMed Central 2014-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4168193/ /pubmed/25237934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-014-0053-9 Text en © Brascamp and Bijma; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Brascamp, Evert W
Bijma, Piter
Methods to estimate breeding values in honey bees
title Methods to estimate breeding values in honey bees
title_full Methods to estimate breeding values in honey bees
title_fullStr Methods to estimate breeding values in honey bees
title_full_unstemmed Methods to estimate breeding values in honey bees
title_short Methods to estimate breeding values in honey bees
title_sort methods to estimate breeding values in honey bees
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25237934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-014-0053-9
work_keys_str_mv AT brascampevertw methodstoestimatebreedingvaluesinhoneybees
AT bijmapiter methodstoestimatebreedingvaluesinhoneybees