Cargando…

Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study

BACKGROUND: Resuscitation is a life-saving measure usually instructed in simulation sessions. Small-group teaching is effective. However, feasible group sizes for resuscitation classes are unknown. We investigated the impact of different group sizes on the outcome of resuscitation training. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahling, Moritz, Münch, Alexander, Schenk, Sebastian, Volkert, Stephan, Rein, Andreas, Teichner, Uwe, Piontek, Pascal, Haffner, Leopold, Heine, Daniel, Manger, Andreas, Reutershan, Jörg, Rosenberger, Peter, Herrmann-Werner, Anne, Zipfel, Stephan, Celebi, Nora
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25194168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-185
_version_ 1782335514495418368
author Mahling, Moritz
Münch, Alexander
Schenk, Sebastian
Volkert, Stephan
Rein, Andreas
Teichner, Uwe
Piontek, Pascal
Haffner, Leopold
Heine, Daniel
Manger, Andreas
Reutershan, Jörg
Rosenberger, Peter
Herrmann-Werner, Anne
Zipfel, Stephan
Celebi, Nora
author_facet Mahling, Moritz
Münch, Alexander
Schenk, Sebastian
Volkert, Stephan
Rein, Andreas
Teichner, Uwe
Piontek, Pascal
Haffner, Leopold
Heine, Daniel
Manger, Andreas
Reutershan, Jörg
Rosenberger, Peter
Herrmann-Werner, Anne
Zipfel, Stephan
Celebi, Nora
author_sort Mahling, Moritz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Resuscitation is a life-saving measure usually instructed in simulation sessions. Small-group teaching is effective. However, feasible group sizes for resuscitation classes are unknown. We investigated the impact of different group sizes on the outcome of resuscitation training. METHODS: Medical students (n = 74) were randomized to courses with three, five or eight participants per tutor. The course duration was adjusted according to the group size, so that there was a time slot of 6 minutes hands-on time for every student. All participants performed an objective structured clinical examination before and after training. The teaching sessions were videotaped and resuscitation quality was scored using a checklist while we measured the chest compression parameters with a manikin. In addition, we recorded hands-on-time, questions to the tutor and unrelated conversation. RESULTS: Results are displayed as median (IQR). Checklist pass rates and scores were comparable between the groups of three, five and eight students per tutor in the post-test (93%, 100% and 100%). Groups of eight students asked fewer questions (0.5 (0.0 – 1.0) vs. 3.0 (2.0 – 4.0), p < .001), had less hands-on time (2:16 min (1:15 – 4:55 min) vs. 4:07 min (2:54 – 5:52 min), p = .02), conducted more unrelated conversations (17.0 ± 5.1 and 2.9 ± 1.7, p < 0.001) and had lower self-assessments than groups of three students per tutor (7.0 (6.1 – 9.0) and 8.2 (7.2 – 9.0), p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Resuscitation checklist scores and pass rates after training were comparable in groups of three, five or eight medical students, although smaller groups had advantages in teaching interventions and hands-on time. Our results suggest that teaching BLS skills is effective in groups up to eight medical students, but smaller groups yielded more intense teaching conditions, which might be crucial for more complex skills or less advanced students. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-185) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4168208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41682082014-09-20 Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study Mahling, Moritz Münch, Alexander Schenk, Sebastian Volkert, Stephan Rein, Andreas Teichner, Uwe Piontek, Pascal Haffner, Leopold Heine, Daniel Manger, Andreas Reutershan, Jörg Rosenberger, Peter Herrmann-Werner, Anne Zipfel, Stephan Celebi, Nora BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Resuscitation is a life-saving measure usually instructed in simulation sessions. Small-group teaching is effective. However, feasible group sizes for resuscitation classes are unknown. We investigated the impact of different group sizes on the outcome of resuscitation training. METHODS: Medical students (n = 74) were randomized to courses with three, five or eight participants per tutor. The course duration was adjusted according to the group size, so that there was a time slot of 6 minutes hands-on time for every student. All participants performed an objective structured clinical examination before and after training. The teaching sessions were videotaped and resuscitation quality was scored using a checklist while we measured the chest compression parameters with a manikin. In addition, we recorded hands-on-time, questions to the tutor and unrelated conversation. RESULTS: Results are displayed as median (IQR). Checklist pass rates and scores were comparable between the groups of three, five and eight students per tutor in the post-test (93%, 100% and 100%). Groups of eight students asked fewer questions (0.5 (0.0 – 1.0) vs. 3.0 (2.0 – 4.0), p < .001), had less hands-on time (2:16 min (1:15 – 4:55 min) vs. 4:07 min (2:54 – 5:52 min), p = .02), conducted more unrelated conversations (17.0 ± 5.1 and 2.9 ± 1.7, p < 0.001) and had lower self-assessments than groups of three students per tutor (7.0 (6.1 – 9.0) and 8.2 (7.2 – 9.0), p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Resuscitation checklist scores and pass rates after training were comparable in groups of three, five or eight medical students, although smaller groups had advantages in teaching interventions and hands-on time. Our results suggest that teaching BLS skills is effective in groups up to eight medical students, but smaller groups yielded more intense teaching conditions, which might be crucial for more complex skills or less advanced students. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-185) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4168208/ /pubmed/25194168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-185 Text en © Mahling et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mahling, Moritz
Münch, Alexander
Schenk, Sebastian
Volkert, Stephan
Rein, Andreas
Teichner, Uwe
Piontek, Pascal
Haffner, Leopold
Heine, Daniel
Manger, Andreas
Reutershan, Jörg
Rosenberger, Peter
Herrmann-Werner, Anne
Zipfel, Stephan
Celebi, Nora
Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study
title Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study
title_full Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study
title_fullStr Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study
title_short Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study
title_sort basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25194168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-185
work_keys_str_mv AT mahlingmoritz basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT munchalexander basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT schenksebastian basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT volkertstephan basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT reinandreas basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT teichneruwe basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT piontekpascal basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT haffnerleopold basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT heinedaniel basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT mangerandreas basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT reutershanjorg basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT rosenbergerpeter basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT herrmannwerneranne basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT zipfelstephan basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT celebinora basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy