Cargando…
Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study
BACKGROUND: Resuscitation is a life-saving measure usually instructed in simulation sessions. Small-group teaching is effective. However, feasible group sizes for resuscitation classes are unknown. We investigated the impact of different group sizes on the outcome of resuscitation training. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25194168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-185 |
_version_ | 1782335514495418368 |
---|---|
author | Mahling, Moritz Münch, Alexander Schenk, Sebastian Volkert, Stephan Rein, Andreas Teichner, Uwe Piontek, Pascal Haffner, Leopold Heine, Daniel Manger, Andreas Reutershan, Jörg Rosenberger, Peter Herrmann-Werner, Anne Zipfel, Stephan Celebi, Nora |
author_facet | Mahling, Moritz Münch, Alexander Schenk, Sebastian Volkert, Stephan Rein, Andreas Teichner, Uwe Piontek, Pascal Haffner, Leopold Heine, Daniel Manger, Andreas Reutershan, Jörg Rosenberger, Peter Herrmann-Werner, Anne Zipfel, Stephan Celebi, Nora |
author_sort | Mahling, Moritz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Resuscitation is a life-saving measure usually instructed in simulation sessions. Small-group teaching is effective. However, feasible group sizes for resuscitation classes are unknown. We investigated the impact of different group sizes on the outcome of resuscitation training. METHODS: Medical students (n = 74) were randomized to courses with three, five or eight participants per tutor. The course duration was adjusted according to the group size, so that there was a time slot of 6 minutes hands-on time for every student. All participants performed an objective structured clinical examination before and after training. The teaching sessions were videotaped and resuscitation quality was scored using a checklist while we measured the chest compression parameters with a manikin. In addition, we recorded hands-on-time, questions to the tutor and unrelated conversation. RESULTS: Results are displayed as median (IQR). Checklist pass rates and scores were comparable between the groups of three, five and eight students per tutor in the post-test (93%, 100% and 100%). Groups of eight students asked fewer questions (0.5 (0.0 – 1.0) vs. 3.0 (2.0 – 4.0), p < .001), had less hands-on time (2:16 min (1:15 – 4:55 min) vs. 4:07 min (2:54 – 5:52 min), p = .02), conducted more unrelated conversations (17.0 ± 5.1 and 2.9 ± 1.7, p < 0.001) and had lower self-assessments than groups of three students per tutor (7.0 (6.1 – 9.0) and 8.2 (7.2 – 9.0), p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Resuscitation checklist scores and pass rates after training were comparable in groups of three, five or eight medical students, although smaller groups had advantages in teaching interventions and hands-on time. Our results suggest that teaching BLS skills is effective in groups up to eight medical students, but smaller groups yielded more intense teaching conditions, which might be crucial for more complex skills or less advanced students. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-185) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4168208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41682082014-09-20 Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study Mahling, Moritz Münch, Alexander Schenk, Sebastian Volkert, Stephan Rein, Andreas Teichner, Uwe Piontek, Pascal Haffner, Leopold Heine, Daniel Manger, Andreas Reutershan, Jörg Rosenberger, Peter Herrmann-Werner, Anne Zipfel, Stephan Celebi, Nora BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Resuscitation is a life-saving measure usually instructed in simulation sessions. Small-group teaching is effective. However, feasible group sizes for resuscitation classes are unknown. We investigated the impact of different group sizes on the outcome of resuscitation training. METHODS: Medical students (n = 74) were randomized to courses with three, five or eight participants per tutor. The course duration was adjusted according to the group size, so that there was a time slot of 6 minutes hands-on time for every student. All participants performed an objective structured clinical examination before and after training. The teaching sessions were videotaped and resuscitation quality was scored using a checklist while we measured the chest compression parameters with a manikin. In addition, we recorded hands-on-time, questions to the tutor and unrelated conversation. RESULTS: Results are displayed as median (IQR). Checklist pass rates and scores were comparable between the groups of three, five and eight students per tutor in the post-test (93%, 100% and 100%). Groups of eight students asked fewer questions (0.5 (0.0 – 1.0) vs. 3.0 (2.0 – 4.0), p < .001), had less hands-on time (2:16 min (1:15 – 4:55 min) vs. 4:07 min (2:54 – 5:52 min), p = .02), conducted more unrelated conversations (17.0 ± 5.1 and 2.9 ± 1.7, p < 0.001) and had lower self-assessments than groups of three students per tutor (7.0 (6.1 – 9.0) and 8.2 (7.2 – 9.0), p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Resuscitation checklist scores and pass rates after training were comparable in groups of three, five or eight medical students, although smaller groups had advantages in teaching interventions and hands-on time. Our results suggest that teaching BLS skills is effective in groups up to eight medical students, but smaller groups yielded more intense teaching conditions, which might be crucial for more complex skills or less advanced students. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-185) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4168208/ /pubmed/25194168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-185 Text en © Mahling et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mahling, Moritz Münch, Alexander Schenk, Sebastian Volkert, Stephan Rein, Andreas Teichner, Uwe Piontek, Pascal Haffner, Leopold Heine, Daniel Manger, Andreas Reutershan, Jörg Rosenberger, Peter Herrmann-Werner, Anne Zipfel, Stephan Celebi, Nora Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study |
title | Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study |
title_full | Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study |
title_fullStr | Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study |
title_full_unstemmed | Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study |
title_short | Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study |
title_sort | basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25194168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahlingmoritz basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT munchalexander basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT schenksebastian basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT volkertstephan basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT reinandreas basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT teichneruwe basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT piontekpascal basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT haffnerleopold basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT heinedaniel basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT mangerandreas basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT reutershanjorg basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT rosenbergerpeter basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT herrmannwerneranne basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT zipfelstephan basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT celebinora basiclifesupportiseffectivelytaughtingroupsofthreefiveandeightmedicalstudentsaprospectiverandomizedstudy |