Cargando…

The immunosignature of canine lymphoma: characterization and diagnostic application

BACKGROUND: Cancer diagnosis in both dogs and humans is complicated by the lack of a non-invasive diagnostic test. To meet this clinical need, we apply the recently developed immunosignature assay to spontaneous canine lymphoma as clinical proof-of-concept. Here we evaluate the immunosignature as a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnston, Stephen Albert, Thamm, Douglas H, Legutki, Joseph Barten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25199568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-657
_version_ 1782335525928042496
author Johnston, Stephen Albert
Thamm, Douglas H
Legutki, Joseph Barten
author_facet Johnston, Stephen Albert
Thamm, Douglas H
Legutki, Joseph Barten
author_sort Johnston, Stephen Albert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cancer diagnosis in both dogs and humans is complicated by the lack of a non-invasive diagnostic test. To meet this clinical need, we apply the recently developed immunosignature assay to spontaneous canine lymphoma as clinical proof-of-concept. Here we evaluate the immunosignature as a diagnostic for spontaneous canine lymphoma at both at initial diagnosis and evaluating the disease free interval following treatment. METHODS: Sera from dogs with confirmed lymphoma (B cell n = 38, T cell n = 11) and clinically normal dogs (n = 39) were analyzed. Serum antibody responses were characterized by analyzing the binding pattern, or immunosignature, of serum antibodies on a non-natural sequence peptide microarray. Peptides were selected and tested for the ability to distinguish healthy dogs from those with lymphoma and to distinguish lymphoma subtypes based on immunophenotype. The immunosignature of dogs with lymphoma were evaluated for individual signatures. Changes in the immunosignatures were evaluated following treatment and eventual relapse. RESULTS: Despite being a clonal disease, both an individual immunosignature and a generalized lymphoma immunosignature were observed in each dog. The general lymphoma immunosignature identified in the initial set of dogs (n = 32) was able to predict disease status in an independent set of dogs (n = 42, 97% accuracy). A separate immunosignature was able to distinguish the lymphoma based on immunophenotype (n = 25, 88% accuracy). The individual immunosignature was capable of confirming remission three months following diagnosis. Immunosignature at diagnosis was able to predict which dogs with B cell lymphoma would relapse in less than 120 days (n = 33, 97% accuracy). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the immunosignature can serve as a multilevel diagnostic for canine, and potentially human, lymphoma. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-657) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4168252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41682522014-09-20 The immunosignature of canine lymphoma: characterization and diagnostic application Johnston, Stephen Albert Thamm, Douglas H Legutki, Joseph Barten BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Cancer diagnosis in both dogs and humans is complicated by the lack of a non-invasive diagnostic test. To meet this clinical need, we apply the recently developed immunosignature assay to spontaneous canine lymphoma as clinical proof-of-concept. Here we evaluate the immunosignature as a diagnostic for spontaneous canine lymphoma at both at initial diagnosis and evaluating the disease free interval following treatment. METHODS: Sera from dogs with confirmed lymphoma (B cell n = 38, T cell n = 11) and clinically normal dogs (n = 39) were analyzed. Serum antibody responses were characterized by analyzing the binding pattern, or immunosignature, of serum antibodies on a non-natural sequence peptide microarray. Peptides were selected and tested for the ability to distinguish healthy dogs from those with lymphoma and to distinguish lymphoma subtypes based on immunophenotype. The immunosignature of dogs with lymphoma were evaluated for individual signatures. Changes in the immunosignatures were evaluated following treatment and eventual relapse. RESULTS: Despite being a clonal disease, both an individual immunosignature and a generalized lymphoma immunosignature were observed in each dog. The general lymphoma immunosignature identified in the initial set of dogs (n = 32) was able to predict disease status in an independent set of dogs (n = 42, 97% accuracy). A separate immunosignature was able to distinguish the lymphoma based on immunophenotype (n = 25, 88% accuracy). The individual immunosignature was capable of confirming remission three months following diagnosis. Immunosignature at diagnosis was able to predict which dogs with B cell lymphoma would relapse in less than 120 days (n = 33, 97% accuracy). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the immunosignature can serve as a multilevel diagnostic for canine, and potentially human, lymphoma. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-657) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4168252/ /pubmed/25199568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-657 Text en © Johnston et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Johnston, Stephen Albert
Thamm, Douglas H
Legutki, Joseph Barten
The immunosignature of canine lymphoma: characterization and diagnostic application
title The immunosignature of canine lymphoma: characterization and diagnostic application
title_full The immunosignature of canine lymphoma: characterization and diagnostic application
title_fullStr The immunosignature of canine lymphoma: characterization and diagnostic application
title_full_unstemmed The immunosignature of canine lymphoma: characterization and diagnostic application
title_short The immunosignature of canine lymphoma: characterization and diagnostic application
title_sort immunosignature of canine lymphoma: characterization and diagnostic application
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25199568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-657
work_keys_str_mv AT johnstonstephenalbert theimmunosignatureofcaninelymphomacharacterizationanddiagnosticapplication
AT thammdouglash theimmunosignatureofcaninelymphomacharacterizationanddiagnosticapplication
AT legutkijosephbarten theimmunosignatureofcaninelymphomacharacterizationanddiagnosticapplication
AT johnstonstephenalbert immunosignatureofcaninelymphomacharacterizationanddiagnosticapplication
AT thammdouglash immunosignatureofcaninelymphomacharacterizationanddiagnosticapplication
AT legutkijosephbarten immunosignatureofcaninelymphomacharacterizationanddiagnosticapplication