Cargando…

Effectiveness of a community-based positive prevention intervention for people living with HIV who are not receiving antiretroviral treatment: a prospective cohort study

Background: We report effectiveness of an HIV-prevention intervention delivered by community health workers (CHWs) in Mombasa, Kenya, to PLHIV who have not initiated or who have discontinued ART—an often difficult-to-reach population because they fall outside the ambit of health care and prevention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarna, Avina, Luchters, Stanley, Musenge, Eustasius, Okal, Jerry, Chersich, Matthew, Tun, Waimar, Mall, Sabine, Kingola, Nzioki, Kalibala, Sam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Global Health: Science and Practice 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276517
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-12-00023
_version_ 1782335569381031936
author Sarna, Avina
Luchters, Stanley
Musenge, Eustasius
Okal, Jerry
Chersich, Matthew
Tun, Waimar
Mall, Sabine
Kingola, Nzioki
Kalibala, Sam
author_facet Sarna, Avina
Luchters, Stanley
Musenge, Eustasius
Okal, Jerry
Chersich, Matthew
Tun, Waimar
Mall, Sabine
Kingola, Nzioki
Kalibala, Sam
author_sort Sarna, Avina
collection PubMed
description Background: We report effectiveness of an HIV-prevention intervention delivered by community health workers (CHWs) in Mombasa, Kenya, to PLHIV who have not initiated or who have discontinued ART—an often difficult-to-reach population because they fall outside the ambit of health care and prevention services. Methods: A 2-arm cohort study assessed a structured risk-reduction intervention involving at least 4 one-to-one counseling sessions and personalized support. The control group received standard prevention services. CHWs recruited treatment-naïve people living with HIV (PLHIV) or those who had previously taken antiretroviral drugs. Data were analyzed using a Propensity Score Matched (PSM)-sample to control for baseline differences between the groups. Results: 634 PLHIV were recruited and followed for 6 months. Median age was 35 years, and 74.3% were female. Participants in the intervention group reported reduced risky sexual behaviors both at endline compared with baseline and compared with the control group. At endline, in the PSM analysis, participants in the intervention arm were less likely than participants in the control group to report unprotected sex with a spouse (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.03-0.24), and they reported fewer unprotected sex acts (12.3% versus 46.0%, respectively; OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.09-0.29; P<0.001). Further, 92.4% of participants in the intervention group reported zero unsafe sex acts (with partners of negative or unknown HIV status) compared with 70.8% in the control group (P<0.001), and more participants in the intervention arm were receiving ART (34.3% versus 12.7%, respectively; P<0.001). Conclusion: CHWs effectively reached PLHIV who had never received or who had discontinued ART, and they delivered a risk-reduction intervention that led to declines in reported sexual risk behaviors, as well as to increases in ART uptake. A scaled-up intervention warrants consideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4168563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Global Health: Science and Practice
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41685632014-09-30 Effectiveness of a community-based positive prevention intervention for people living with HIV who are not receiving antiretroviral treatment: a prospective cohort study Sarna, Avina Luchters, Stanley Musenge, Eustasius Okal, Jerry Chersich, Matthew Tun, Waimar Mall, Sabine Kingola, Nzioki Kalibala, Sam Glob Health Sci Pract Original Articles Background: We report effectiveness of an HIV-prevention intervention delivered by community health workers (CHWs) in Mombasa, Kenya, to PLHIV who have not initiated or who have discontinued ART—an often difficult-to-reach population because they fall outside the ambit of health care and prevention services. Methods: A 2-arm cohort study assessed a structured risk-reduction intervention involving at least 4 one-to-one counseling sessions and personalized support. The control group received standard prevention services. CHWs recruited treatment-naïve people living with HIV (PLHIV) or those who had previously taken antiretroviral drugs. Data were analyzed using a Propensity Score Matched (PSM)-sample to control for baseline differences between the groups. Results: 634 PLHIV were recruited and followed for 6 months. Median age was 35 years, and 74.3% were female. Participants in the intervention group reported reduced risky sexual behaviors both at endline compared with baseline and compared with the control group. At endline, in the PSM analysis, participants in the intervention arm were less likely than participants in the control group to report unprotected sex with a spouse (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.03-0.24), and they reported fewer unprotected sex acts (12.3% versus 46.0%, respectively; OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.09-0.29; P<0.001). Further, 92.4% of participants in the intervention group reported zero unsafe sex acts (with partners of negative or unknown HIV status) compared with 70.8% in the control group (P<0.001), and more participants in the intervention arm were receiving ART (34.3% versus 12.7%, respectively; P<0.001). Conclusion: CHWs effectively reached PLHIV who had never received or who had discontinued ART, and they delivered a risk-reduction intervention that led to declines in reported sexual risk behaviors, as well as to increases in ART uptake. A scaled-up intervention warrants consideration. Global Health: Science and Practice 2013-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4168563/ /pubmed/25276517 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-12-00023 Text en © Sarna et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sarna, Avina
Luchters, Stanley
Musenge, Eustasius
Okal, Jerry
Chersich, Matthew
Tun, Waimar
Mall, Sabine
Kingola, Nzioki
Kalibala, Sam
Effectiveness of a community-based positive prevention intervention for people living with HIV who are not receiving antiretroviral treatment: a prospective cohort study
title Effectiveness of a community-based positive prevention intervention for people living with HIV who are not receiving antiretroviral treatment: a prospective cohort study
title_full Effectiveness of a community-based positive prevention intervention for people living with HIV who are not receiving antiretroviral treatment: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a community-based positive prevention intervention for people living with HIV who are not receiving antiretroviral treatment: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a community-based positive prevention intervention for people living with HIV who are not receiving antiretroviral treatment: a prospective cohort study
title_short Effectiveness of a community-based positive prevention intervention for people living with HIV who are not receiving antiretroviral treatment: a prospective cohort study
title_sort effectiveness of a community-based positive prevention intervention for people living with hiv who are not receiving antiretroviral treatment: a prospective cohort study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276517
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-12-00023
work_keys_str_mv AT sarnaavina effectivenessofacommunitybasedpositivepreventioninterventionforpeoplelivingwithhivwhoarenotreceivingantiretroviraltreatmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT luchtersstanley effectivenessofacommunitybasedpositivepreventioninterventionforpeoplelivingwithhivwhoarenotreceivingantiretroviraltreatmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT musengeeustasius effectivenessofacommunitybasedpositivepreventioninterventionforpeoplelivingwithhivwhoarenotreceivingantiretroviraltreatmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT okaljerry effectivenessofacommunitybasedpositivepreventioninterventionforpeoplelivingwithhivwhoarenotreceivingantiretroviraltreatmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT chersichmatthew effectivenessofacommunitybasedpositivepreventioninterventionforpeoplelivingwithhivwhoarenotreceivingantiretroviraltreatmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT tunwaimar effectivenessofacommunitybasedpositivepreventioninterventionforpeoplelivingwithhivwhoarenotreceivingantiretroviraltreatmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT mallsabine effectivenessofacommunitybasedpositivepreventioninterventionforpeoplelivingwithhivwhoarenotreceivingantiretroviraltreatmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT kingolanzioki effectivenessofacommunitybasedpositivepreventioninterventionforpeoplelivingwithhivwhoarenotreceivingantiretroviraltreatmentaprospectivecohortstudy
AT kalibalasam effectivenessofacommunitybasedpositivepreventioninterventionforpeoplelivingwithhivwhoarenotreceivingantiretroviraltreatmentaprospectivecohortstudy