Cargando…

Does free pregnancy testing reduce service denial in family planning clinics? A cluster-randomized experiment in Zambia and Ghana

BACKGROUND: In many countries, pregnancy tests are not freely available in family planning clinics. As a result, providers sometimes deny services to non-menstruating clients due to uncertainty about pregnancy. Few clients are actually pregnant, yet denied clients run the risk of becoming pregnant,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stanback, John, Vance, Gwyneth, Asare, Gloria, Kasonde, Prisca, Kafulubiti, Beatrice, Chen, Mario, Janowitz, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Global Health: Science and Practice 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276551
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00011
_version_ 1782335574169878528
author Stanback, John
Vance, Gwyneth
Asare, Gloria
Kasonde, Prisca
Kafulubiti, Beatrice
Chen, Mario
Janowitz, Barbara
author_facet Stanback, John
Vance, Gwyneth
Asare, Gloria
Kasonde, Prisca
Kafulubiti, Beatrice
Chen, Mario
Janowitz, Barbara
author_sort Stanback, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In many countries, pregnancy tests are not freely available in family planning clinics. As a result, providers sometimes deny services to non-menstruating clients due to uncertainty about pregnancy. Few clients are actually pregnant, yet denied clients run the risk of becoming pregnant, and those sent to pharmacies pay inflated prices for inexpensive tests. To assess the programmatic effect of free pregnancy testing, we conducted cluster-randomized trials in Ghana and Zambia, assessing clients' uptake of contraception in family planning clinics. METHODS: In each country, 5 clinics were randomized to intervention status and 5 to control. Service data from 2,028 new, non-menstruating clients in Zambia and 1,556 in Ghana were collected. Intervention clinics received supplies of pregnancy tests, and staff were instructed to use tests as needed to help exclude pregnancy. Control clinics received no intervention. The primary outcome was the proportion of non-menstruating clients denied an effective contraceptive method. Cost-effectiveness was also evaluated. RESULTS: In Zambia, clients in intervention and control clinics faced a similar risk of service denial at baseline, 15% and 17%, respectively. At follow-up, denial remained unchanged at 17% in control clinics, but decreased significantly to 4% in intervention sites. Clients in Zambia were 4.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3–14.4) times more likely to be denied a method in control sites versus intervention sites (P<.01). Results from Ghana were inconclusive. Cost of a “denial averted” in Zambia was estimated to be US$0.59. INTERPRETATION: Zambia results suggest that availability of free pregnancy testing significantly reduced contraceptive service denial, although results from Ghana preclude an unqualified recommendation. Authors conclude that free pregnancy testing in family planning clinics may make strong public health sense in those developing countries where denial to non-menstruating clients remains a problem. Although pregnancy can usually be excluded with a client history, pregnancy tests are often necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4168583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Global Health: Science and Practice
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41685832014-09-30 Does free pregnancy testing reduce service denial in family planning clinics? A cluster-randomized experiment in Zambia and Ghana Stanback, John Vance, Gwyneth Asare, Gloria Kasonde, Prisca Kafulubiti, Beatrice Chen, Mario Janowitz, Barbara Glob Health Sci Pract Original Articles BACKGROUND: In many countries, pregnancy tests are not freely available in family planning clinics. As a result, providers sometimes deny services to non-menstruating clients due to uncertainty about pregnancy. Few clients are actually pregnant, yet denied clients run the risk of becoming pregnant, and those sent to pharmacies pay inflated prices for inexpensive tests. To assess the programmatic effect of free pregnancy testing, we conducted cluster-randomized trials in Ghana and Zambia, assessing clients' uptake of contraception in family planning clinics. METHODS: In each country, 5 clinics were randomized to intervention status and 5 to control. Service data from 2,028 new, non-menstruating clients in Zambia and 1,556 in Ghana were collected. Intervention clinics received supplies of pregnancy tests, and staff were instructed to use tests as needed to help exclude pregnancy. Control clinics received no intervention. The primary outcome was the proportion of non-menstruating clients denied an effective contraceptive method. Cost-effectiveness was also evaluated. RESULTS: In Zambia, clients in intervention and control clinics faced a similar risk of service denial at baseline, 15% and 17%, respectively. At follow-up, denial remained unchanged at 17% in control clinics, but decreased significantly to 4% in intervention sites. Clients in Zambia were 4.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3–14.4) times more likely to be denied a method in control sites versus intervention sites (P<.01). Results from Ghana were inconclusive. Cost of a “denial averted” in Zambia was estimated to be US$0.59. INTERPRETATION: Zambia results suggest that availability of free pregnancy testing significantly reduced contraceptive service denial, although results from Ghana preclude an unqualified recommendation. Authors conclude that free pregnancy testing in family planning clinics may make strong public health sense in those developing countries where denial to non-menstruating clients remains a problem. Although pregnancy can usually be excluded with a client history, pregnancy tests are often necessary. Global Health: Science and Practice 2013-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4168583/ /pubmed/25276551 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00011 Text en © Stanback et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Articles
Stanback, John
Vance, Gwyneth
Asare, Gloria
Kasonde, Prisca
Kafulubiti, Beatrice
Chen, Mario
Janowitz, Barbara
Does free pregnancy testing reduce service denial in family planning clinics? A cluster-randomized experiment in Zambia and Ghana
title Does free pregnancy testing reduce service denial in family planning clinics? A cluster-randomized experiment in Zambia and Ghana
title_full Does free pregnancy testing reduce service denial in family planning clinics? A cluster-randomized experiment in Zambia and Ghana
title_fullStr Does free pregnancy testing reduce service denial in family planning clinics? A cluster-randomized experiment in Zambia and Ghana
title_full_unstemmed Does free pregnancy testing reduce service denial in family planning clinics? A cluster-randomized experiment in Zambia and Ghana
title_short Does free pregnancy testing reduce service denial in family planning clinics? A cluster-randomized experiment in Zambia and Ghana
title_sort does free pregnancy testing reduce service denial in family planning clinics? a cluster-randomized experiment in zambia and ghana
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276551
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00011
work_keys_str_mv AT stanbackjohn doesfreepregnancytestingreduceservicedenialinfamilyplanningclinicsaclusterrandomizedexperimentinzambiaandghana
AT vancegwyneth doesfreepregnancytestingreduceservicedenialinfamilyplanningclinicsaclusterrandomizedexperimentinzambiaandghana
AT asaregloria doesfreepregnancytestingreduceservicedenialinfamilyplanningclinicsaclusterrandomizedexperimentinzambiaandghana
AT kasondeprisca doesfreepregnancytestingreduceservicedenialinfamilyplanningclinicsaclusterrandomizedexperimentinzambiaandghana
AT kafulubitibeatrice doesfreepregnancytestingreduceservicedenialinfamilyplanningclinicsaclusterrandomizedexperimentinzambiaandghana
AT chenmario doesfreepregnancytestingreduceservicedenialinfamilyplanningclinicsaclusterrandomizedexperimentinzambiaandghana
AT janowitzbarbara doesfreepregnancytestingreduceservicedenialinfamilyplanningclinicsaclusterrandomizedexperimentinzambiaandghana