Cargando…

Systems approach to monitoring and evaluation guides scale up of the Standard Days Method of family planning in Rwanda

There is no guarantee that a successful pilot program introducing a reproductive health innovation can also be expanded successfully to the national or regional level, because the scaling-up process is complex and multilayered. This article describes how a successful pilot program to integrate the S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Igras, Susan, Sinai, Irit, Mukabatsinda, Marie, Ngabo, Fidele, Jennings, Victoria, Lundgren, Rebecka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Global Health: Science and Practice 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276581
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00165
_version_ 1782335583291441152
author Igras, Susan
Sinai, Irit
Mukabatsinda, Marie
Ngabo, Fidele
Jennings, Victoria
Lundgren, Rebecka
author_facet Igras, Susan
Sinai, Irit
Mukabatsinda, Marie
Ngabo, Fidele
Jennings, Victoria
Lundgren, Rebecka
author_sort Igras, Susan
collection PubMed
description There is no guarantee that a successful pilot program introducing a reproductive health innovation can also be expanded successfully to the national or regional level, because the scaling-up process is complex and multilayered. This article describes how a successful pilot program to integrate the Standard Days Method (SDM) of family planning into existing Ministry of Health services was scaled up nationally in Rwanda. Much of the success of the scale-up effort was due to systematic use of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) data from several sources to make midcourse corrections. Four lessons learned illustrate this crucially important approach. First, ongoing M&E data showed that provider training protocols and client materials that worked in the pilot phase did not work at scale; therefore, we simplified these materials to support integration into the national program. Second, triangulation of ongoing monitoring data with national health facility and population-based surveys revealed serious problems in supply chain mechanisms that affected SDM (and the accompanying CycleBeads client tool) availability and use; new procedures for ordering supplies and monitoring stockouts were instituted at the facility level. Third, supervision reports and special studies revealed that providers were imposing unnecessary medical barriers to SDM use; refresher training and revised supervision protocols improved provider practices. Finally, informal environmental scans, stakeholder interviews, and key events timelines identified shifting political and health policy environments that influenced scale-up outcomes; ongoing advocacy efforts are addressing these issues. The SDM scale-up experience in Rwanda confirms the importance of monitoring and evaluating programmatic efforts continuously, using a variety of data sources, to improve program outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4168622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Global Health: Science and Practice
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41686222014-09-30 Systems approach to monitoring and evaluation guides scale up of the Standard Days Method of family planning in Rwanda Igras, Susan Sinai, Irit Mukabatsinda, Marie Ngabo, Fidele Jennings, Victoria Lundgren, Rebecka Glob Health Sci Pract Original Articles There is no guarantee that a successful pilot program introducing a reproductive health innovation can also be expanded successfully to the national or regional level, because the scaling-up process is complex and multilayered. This article describes how a successful pilot program to integrate the Standard Days Method (SDM) of family planning into existing Ministry of Health services was scaled up nationally in Rwanda. Much of the success of the scale-up effort was due to systematic use of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) data from several sources to make midcourse corrections. Four lessons learned illustrate this crucially important approach. First, ongoing M&E data showed that provider training protocols and client materials that worked in the pilot phase did not work at scale; therefore, we simplified these materials to support integration into the national program. Second, triangulation of ongoing monitoring data with national health facility and population-based surveys revealed serious problems in supply chain mechanisms that affected SDM (and the accompanying CycleBeads client tool) availability and use; new procedures for ordering supplies and monitoring stockouts were instituted at the facility level. Third, supervision reports and special studies revealed that providers were imposing unnecessary medical barriers to SDM use; refresher training and revised supervision protocols improved provider practices. Finally, informal environmental scans, stakeholder interviews, and key events timelines identified shifting political and health policy environments that influenced scale-up outcomes; ongoing advocacy efforts are addressing these issues. The SDM scale-up experience in Rwanda confirms the importance of monitoring and evaluating programmatic efforts continuously, using a variety of data sources, to improve program outcomes. Global Health: Science and Practice 2014-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4168622/ /pubmed/25276581 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00165 Text en © Igras et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Articles
Igras, Susan
Sinai, Irit
Mukabatsinda, Marie
Ngabo, Fidele
Jennings, Victoria
Lundgren, Rebecka
Systems approach to monitoring and evaluation guides scale up of the Standard Days Method of family planning in Rwanda
title Systems approach to monitoring and evaluation guides scale up of the Standard Days Method of family planning in Rwanda
title_full Systems approach to monitoring and evaluation guides scale up of the Standard Days Method of family planning in Rwanda
title_fullStr Systems approach to monitoring and evaluation guides scale up of the Standard Days Method of family planning in Rwanda
title_full_unstemmed Systems approach to monitoring and evaluation guides scale up of the Standard Days Method of family planning in Rwanda
title_short Systems approach to monitoring and evaluation guides scale up of the Standard Days Method of family planning in Rwanda
title_sort systems approach to monitoring and evaluation guides scale up of the standard days method of family planning in rwanda
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276581
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00165
work_keys_str_mv AT igrassusan systemsapproachtomonitoringandevaluationguidesscaleupofthestandarddaysmethodoffamilyplanninginrwanda
AT sinaiirit systemsapproachtomonitoringandevaluationguidesscaleupofthestandarddaysmethodoffamilyplanninginrwanda
AT mukabatsindamarie systemsapproachtomonitoringandevaluationguidesscaleupofthestandarddaysmethodoffamilyplanninginrwanda
AT ngabofidele systemsapproachtomonitoringandevaluationguidesscaleupofthestandarddaysmethodoffamilyplanninginrwanda
AT jenningsvictoria systemsapproachtomonitoringandevaluationguidesscaleupofthestandarddaysmethodoffamilyplanninginrwanda
AT lundgrenrebecka systemsapproachtomonitoringandevaluationguidesscaleupofthestandarddaysmethodoffamilyplanninginrwanda