Cargando…
Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated mainly in adults and doses may not be appropriate in pediatric applications. In perinatal stroke where potential applications are promising, rational adaptation of dosage for children remains under investigation. Object...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25285077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00739 |
_version_ | 1782335598343749632 |
---|---|
author | Gillick, Bernadette T. Kirton, Adam Carmel, Jason B. Minhas, Preet Bikson, Marom |
author_facet | Gillick, Bernadette T. Kirton, Adam Carmel, Jason B. Minhas, Preet Bikson, Marom |
author_sort | Gillick, Bernadette T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated mainly in adults and doses may not be appropriate in pediatric applications. In perinatal stroke where potential applications are promising, rational adaptation of dosage for children remains under investigation. Objective: Construct child-specific tDCS dosing parameters through case study within a perinatal stroke tDCS safety and feasibility trial. Methods: 10-year-old subject with a diagnosis of presumed perinatal ischemic stroke and hemiparesis was identified. T1 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans used to derive computerized model for current flow and electrode positions. Workflow using modeling results and consideration of dosage in previous clinical trials was incorporated. Prior ad hoc adult montages vs. de novo optimized montages provided distinct risk benefit analysis. Approximating adult dose required consideration of changes in both peak brain current flow and distribution which further tradeoff between maximizing efficacy and adding safety factors. Electrode size, position, current intensity, compliance voltage, and duration were controlled independently in this process. Results: Brain electric fields modeled and compared to values previously predicted models (Datta et al., 2011; Minhas et al., 2012). Approximating conservative brain current flow patterns and intensities used in previous adult trials for comparable indications, the optimal current intensity established was 0.7 mA for 10 min with a tDCS C3/C4 montage. Specifically 0.7 mA produced comparable peak brain current intensity of an average adult receiving 1.0 mA. Electrode size of 5 × 7 cm(2) with 1.0 mA and low-voltage tDCS was employed to maximize tolerability. Safety and feasibility confirmed with subject tolerating the session well and no serious adverse events. Conclusion: Rational approaches to dose customization, with steps informed by computational modeling, may improve guidance for pediatric stroke tDCS trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4168687 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41686872014-10-03 Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization Gillick, Bernadette T. Kirton, Adam Carmel, Jason B. Minhas, Preet Bikson, Marom Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated mainly in adults and doses may not be appropriate in pediatric applications. In perinatal stroke where potential applications are promising, rational adaptation of dosage for children remains under investigation. Objective: Construct child-specific tDCS dosing parameters through case study within a perinatal stroke tDCS safety and feasibility trial. Methods: 10-year-old subject with a diagnosis of presumed perinatal ischemic stroke and hemiparesis was identified. T1 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans used to derive computerized model for current flow and electrode positions. Workflow using modeling results and consideration of dosage in previous clinical trials was incorporated. Prior ad hoc adult montages vs. de novo optimized montages provided distinct risk benefit analysis. Approximating adult dose required consideration of changes in both peak brain current flow and distribution which further tradeoff between maximizing efficacy and adding safety factors. Electrode size, position, current intensity, compliance voltage, and duration were controlled independently in this process. Results: Brain electric fields modeled and compared to values previously predicted models (Datta et al., 2011; Minhas et al., 2012). Approximating conservative brain current flow patterns and intensities used in previous adult trials for comparable indications, the optimal current intensity established was 0.7 mA for 10 min with a tDCS C3/C4 montage. Specifically 0.7 mA produced comparable peak brain current intensity of an average adult receiving 1.0 mA. Electrode size of 5 × 7 cm(2) with 1.0 mA and low-voltage tDCS was employed to maximize tolerability. Safety and feasibility confirmed with subject tolerating the session well and no serious adverse events. Conclusion: Rational approaches to dose customization, with steps informed by computational modeling, may improve guidance for pediatric stroke tDCS trials. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4168687/ /pubmed/25285077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00739 Text en Copyright © 2014 Gillick, Kirton, Carmel, Minhas and Bikson. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Gillick, Bernadette T. Kirton, Adam Carmel, Jason B. Minhas, Preet Bikson, Marom Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization |
title | Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization |
title_full | Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization |
title_fullStr | Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization |
title_full_unstemmed | Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization |
title_short | Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization |
title_sort | pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25285077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00739 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillickbernadettet pediatricstrokeandtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationmethodsforrationalindividualizeddoseoptimization AT kirtonadam pediatricstrokeandtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationmethodsforrationalindividualizeddoseoptimization AT carmeljasonb pediatricstrokeandtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationmethodsforrationalindividualizeddoseoptimization AT minhaspreet pediatricstrokeandtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationmethodsforrationalindividualizeddoseoptimization AT biksonmarom pediatricstrokeandtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationmethodsforrationalindividualizeddoseoptimization |