Cargando…
ILP-based maximum likelihood genome scaffolding
BACKGROUND: Interest in de novo genome assembly has been renewed in the past decade due to rapid advances in high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies which generate relatively short reads resulting in highly fragmented assemblies consisting of contigs. Additional long-range linkage information...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25253180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-S9-S9 |
_version_ | 1782335602488770560 |
---|---|
author | Lindsay, James Salooti, Hamed Măndoiu, Ion Zelikovsky, Alex |
author_facet | Lindsay, James Salooti, Hamed Măndoiu, Ion Zelikovsky, Alex |
author_sort | Lindsay, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Interest in de novo genome assembly has been renewed in the past decade due to rapid advances in high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies which generate relatively short reads resulting in highly fragmented assemblies consisting of contigs. Additional long-range linkage information is typically used to orient, order, and link contigs into larger structures referred to as scaffolds. Due to library preparation artifacts and erroneous mapping of reads originating from repeats, scaffolding remains a challenging problem. In this paper, we provide a scalable scaffolding algorithm (SILP2) employing a maximum likelihood model capturing read mapping uncertainty and/or non-uniformity of contig coverage which is solved using integer linear programming. A Non-Serial Dynamic Programming (NSDP) paradigm is applied to render our algorithm useful in the processing of larger mammalian genomes. To compare scaffolding tools, we employ novel quantitative metrics in addition to the extant metrics in the field. We have also expanded the set of experiments to include scaffolding of low-complexity metagenomic samples. RESULTS: SILP2 achieves better scalability throughg a more efficient NSDP algorithm than previous release of SILP. The results show that SILP2 compares favorably to previous methods OPERA and MIP in both scalability and accuracy for scaffolding single genomes of up to human size, and significantly outperforms them on scaffolding low-complexity metagenomic samples. CONCLUSIONS: Equipped with NSDP, SILP2 is able to scaffold large mammalian genomes, resulting in the longest and most accurate scaffolds. The ILP formulation for the maximum likelihood model is shown to be flexible enough to handle metagenomic samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4168704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41687042014-10-02 ILP-based maximum likelihood genome scaffolding Lindsay, James Salooti, Hamed Măndoiu, Ion Zelikovsky, Alex BMC Bioinformatics Proceedings BACKGROUND: Interest in de novo genome assembly has been renewed in the past decade due to rapid advances in high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies which generate relatively short reads resulting in highly fragmented assemblies consisting of contigs. Additional long-range linkage information is typically used to orient, order, and link contigs into larger structures referred to as scaffolds. Due to library preparation artifacts and erroneous mapping of reads originating from repeats, scaffolding remains a challenging problem. In this paper, we provide a scalable scaffolding algorithm (SILP2) employing a maximum likelihood model capturing read mapping uncertainty and/or non-uniformity of contig coverage which is solved using integer linear programming. A Non-Serial Dynamic Programming (NSDP) paradigm is applied to render our algorithm useful in the processing of larger mammalian genomes. To compare scaffolding tools, we employ novel quantitative metrics in addition to the extant metrics in the field. We have also expanded the set of experiments to include scaffolding of low-complexity metagenomic samples. RESULTS: SILP2 achieves better scalability throughg a more efficient NSDP algorithm than previous release of SILP. The results show that SILP2 compares favorably to previous methods OPERA and MIP in both scalability and accuracy for scaffolding single genomes of up to human size, and significantly outperforms them on scaffolding low-complexity metagenomic samples. CONCLUSIONS: Equipped with NSDP, SILP2 is able to scaffold large mammalian genomes, resulting in the longest and most accurate scaffolds. The ILP formulation for the maximum likelihood model is shown to be flexible enough to handle metagenomic samples. BioMed Central 2014-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4168704/ /pubmed/25253180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-S9-S9 Text en Copyright © 2014 Lindsay et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Proceedings Lindsay, James Salooti, Hamed Măndoiu, Ion Zelikovsky, Alex ILP-based maximum likelihood genome scaffolding |
title | ILP-based maximum likelihood genome scaffolding |
title_full | ILP-based maximum likelihood genome scaffolding |
title_fullStr | ILP-based maximum likelihood genome scaffolding |
title_full_unstemmed | ILP-based maximum likelihood genome scaffolding |
title_short | ILP-based maximum likelihood genome scaffolding |
title_sort | ilp-based maximum likelihood genome scaffolding |
topic | Proceedings |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4168704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25253180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-S9-S9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lindsayjames ilpbasedmaximumlikelihoodgenomescaffolding AT salootihamed ilpbasedmaximumlikelihoodgenomescaffolding AT mandoiuion ilpbasedmaximumlikelihoodgenomescaffolding AT zelikovskyalex ilpbasedmaximumlikelihoodgenomescaffolding |