Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Emulsion versus Liposomal Formulation in Indian Patients with Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Randomized, Open-Label Study

BACKGROUND: India is home to 60% of the total global visceral leishmaniasis (VL) population. Use of long-term oral (e.g. miltefosine) and parenteral drugs, considered the mainstay for treatment of VL, is now faced with increased resistance, decreased efficacy, low compliance and safety issues. The a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sundar, Shyam, Pandey, Krishna, Thakur, Chandreshwar Prasad, Jha, Tara Kant, Das, Vidya Nand Ravi, Verma, Neena, Lal, Chandra Shekhar, Verma, Deepak, Alam, Shahnawaz, Das, Pradeep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25233346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003169
_version_ 1782335682380824576
author Sundar, Shyam
Pandey, Krishna
Thakur, Chandreshwar Prasad
Jha, Tara Kant
Das, Vidya Nand Ravi
Verma, Neena
Lal, Chandra Shekhar
Verma, Deepak
Alam, Shahnawaz
Das, Pradeep
author_facet Sundar, Shyam
Pandey, Krishna
Thakur, Chandreshwar Prasad
Jha, Tara Kant
Das, Vidya Nand Ravi
Verma, Neena
Lal, Chandra Shekhar
Verma, Deepak
Alam, Shahnawaz
Das, Pradeep
author_sort Sundar, Shyam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: India is home to 60% of the total global visceral leishmaniasis (VL) population. Use of long-term oral (e.g. miltefosine) and parenteral drugs, considered the mainstay for treatment of VL, is now faced with increased resistance, decreased efficacy, low compliance and safety issues. The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of an alternate treatment option, i.e. single infusion of preformed amphotericin B (AmB) lipid emulsion (ABLE) in comparison with that of liposomal formulation (LAmB). METHODS: In this multicentric, open-label study, 500 patients with VL were randomly assigned in a 3∶1 ratio to receive 15 mg/kg single infusion of either ABLE (N = 376) or LAmB (N = 124). Initial cure (Day 30/45), clinical improvement (Day 30) and long term definitive cure (Day 180) were assessed. FINDINGS: A total of 326 (86.7%) patients in the ABLE group and 122 (98.4%) patients in the LAmB group completed the study. Initial cure was achieved by 95.9% of patients in the ABLE group compared to 100% in the LAmB group (p = 0.028; 95% CI: −0.0663, −0.0150). Clinical improvement was comparable between treatments (ABLE: 98.9% vs. LAmB: 98.4%). Definitive cure was achieved in 85.9% with ABLE compared to 98.4% with LAmB. Infusion-related pyrexia (37.2% vs. 32.3%) and chills (18.4% vs. 18.5%) were comparable between ABLE and LAmB, respectively. Treatment-related serious adverse events were fewer in ABLE (0.3%) compared to LAmB (1.6%). Two deaths occurred in the ABLE group, of which one was probably related to the study drug. Nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity was not observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: ABLE 15 mg/kg single infusion had favorable efficacy and was well tolerated. Considering the demographic profile of the population in this region, a single dose treatment offers advantages in terms of compliance, cost and applicability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00876824
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4169371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41693712014-09-22 Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Emulsion versus Liposomal Formulation in Indian Patients with Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Randomized, Open-Label Study Sundar, Shyam Pandey, Krishna Thakur, Chandreshwar Prasad Jha, Tara Kant Das, Vidya Nand Ravi Verma, Neena Lal, Chandra Shekhar Verma, Deepak Alam, Shahnawaz Das, Pradeep PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: India is home to 60% of the total global visceral leishmaniasis (VL) population. Use of long-term oral (e.g. miltefosine) and parenteral drugs, considered the mainstay for treatment of VL, is now faced with increased resistance, decreased efficacy, low compliance and safety issues. The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of an alternate treatment option, i.e. single infusion of preformed amphotericin B (AmB) lipid emulsion (ABLE) in comparison with that of liposomal formulation (LAmB). METHODS: In this multicentric, open-label study, 500 patients with VL were randomly assigned in a 3∶1 ratio to receive 15 mg/kg single infusion of either ABLE (N = 376) or LAmB (N = 124). Initial cure (Day 30/45), clinical improvement (Day 30) and long term definitive cure (Day 180) were assessed. FINDINGS: A total of 326 (86.7%) patients in the ABLE group and 122 (98.4%) patients in the LAmB group completed the study. Initial cure was achieved by 95.9% of patients in the ABLE group compared to 100% in the LAmB group (p = 0.028; 95% CI: −0.0663, −0.0150). Clinical improvement was comparable between treatments (ABLE: 98.9% vs. LAmB: 98.4%). Definitive cure was achieved in 85.9% with ABLE compared to 98.4% with LAmB. Infusion-related pyrexia (37.2% vs. 32.3%) and chills (18.4% vs. 18.5%) were comparable between ABLE and LAmB, respectively. Treatment-related serious adverse events were fewer in ABLE (0.3%) compared to LAmB (1.6%). Two deaths occurred in the ABLE group, of which one was probably related to the study drug. Nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity was not observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: ABLE 15 mg/kg single infusion had favorable efficacy and was well tolerated. Considering the demographic profile of the population in this region, a single dose treatment offers advantages in terms of compliance, cost and applicability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00876824 Public Library of Science 2014-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4169371/ /pubmed/25233346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003169 Text en © 2014 Sundar et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sundar, Shyam
Pandey, Krishna
Thakur, Chandreshwar Prasad
Jha, Tara Kant
Das, Vidya Nand Ravi
Verma, Neena
Lal, Chandra Shekhar
Verma, Deepak
Alam, Shahnawaz
Das, Pradeep
Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Emulsion versus Liposomal Formulation in Indian Patients with Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Randomized, Open-Label Study
title Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Emulsion versus Liposomal Formulation in Indian Patients with Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Randomized, Open-Label Study
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Emulsion versus Liposomal Formulation in Indian Patients with Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Randomized, Open-Label Study
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Emulsion versus Liposomal Formulation in Indian Patients with Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Randomized, Open-Label Study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Emulsion versus Liposomal Formulation in Indian Patients with Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Randomized, Open-Label Study
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Emulsion versus Liposomal Formulation in Indian Patients with Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Randomized, Open-Label Study
title_sort efficacy and safety of amphotericin b emulsion versus liposomal formulation in indian patients with visceral leishmaniasis: a randomized, open-label study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25233346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003169
work_keys_str_mv AT sundarshyam efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy
AT pandeykrishna efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy
AT thakurchandreshwarprasad efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy
AT jhatarakant efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy
AT dasvidyanandravi efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy
AT vermaneena efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy
AT lalchandrashekhar efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy
AT vermadeepak efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy
AT alamshahnawaz efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy
AT daspradeep efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy