Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Emulsion versus Liposomal Formulation in Indian Patients with Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Randomized, Open-Label Study
BACKGROUND: India is home to 60% of the total global visceral leishmaniasis (VL) population. Use of long-term oral (e.g. miltefosine) and parenteral drugs, considered the mainstay for treatment of VL, is now faced with increased resistance, decreased efficacy, low compliance and safety issues. The a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25233346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003169 |
_version_ | 1782335682380824576 |
---|---|
author | Sundar, Shyam Pandey, Krishna Thakur, Chandreshwar Prasad Jha, Tara Kant Das, Vidya Nand Ravi Verma, Neena Lal, Chandra Shekhar Verma, Deepak Alam, Shahnawaz Das, Pradeep |
author_facet | Sundar, Shyam Pandey, Krishna Thakur, Chandreshwar Prasad Jha, Tara Kant Das, Vidya Nand Ravi Verma, Neena Lal, Chandra Shekhar Verma, Deepak Alam, Shahnawaz Das, Pradeep |
author_sort | Sundar, Shyam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: India is home to 60% of the total global visceral leishmaniasis (VL) population. Use of long-term oral (e.g. miltefosine) and parenteral drugs, considered the mainstay for treatment of VL, is now faced with increased resistance, decreased efficacy, low compliance and safety issues. The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of an alternate treatment option, i.e. single infusion of preformed amphotericin B (AmB) lipid emulsion (ABLE) in comparison with that of liposomal formulation (LAmB). METHODS: In this multicentric, open-label study, 500 patients with VL were randomly assigned in a 3∶1 ratio to receive 15 mg/kg single infusion of either ABLE (N = 376) or LAmB (N = 124). Initial cure (Day 30/45), clinical improvement (Day 30) and long term definitive cure (Day 180) were assessed. FINDINGS: A total of 326 (86.7%) patients in the ABLE group and 122 (98.4%) patients in the LAmB group completed the study. Initial cure was achieved by 95.9% of patients in the ABLE group compared to 100% in the LAmB group (p = 0.028; 95% CI: −0.0663, −0.0150). Clinical improvement was comparable between treatments (ABLE: 98.9% vs. LAmB: 98.4%). Definitive cure was achieved in 85.9% with ABLE compared to 98.4% with LAmB. Infusion-related pyrexia (37.2% vs. 32.3%) and chills (18.4% vs. 18.5%) were comparable between ABLE and LAmB, respectively. Treatment-related serious adverse events were fewer in ABLE (0.3%) compared to LAmB (1.6%). Two deaths occurred in the ABLE group, of which one was probably related to the study drug. Nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity was not observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: ABLE 15 mg/kg single infusion had favorable efficacy and was well tolerated. Considering the demographic profile of the population in this region, a single dose treatment offers advantages in terms of compliance, cost and applicability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00876824 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4169371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41693712014-09-22 Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Emulsion versus Liposomal Formulation in Indian Patients with Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Randomized, Open-Label Study Sundar, Shyam Pandey, Krishna Thakur, Chandreshwar Prasad Jha, Tara Kant Das, Vidya Nand Ravi Verma, Neena Lal, Chandra Shekhar Verma, Deepak Alam, Shahnawaz Das, Pradeep PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: India is home to 60% of the total global visceral leishmaniasis (VL) population. Use of long-term oral (e.g. miltefosine) and parenteral drugs, considered the mainstay for treatment of VL, is now faced with increased resistance, decreased efficacy, low compliance and safety issues. The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of an alternate treatment option, i.e. single infusion of preformed amphotericin B (AmB) lipid emulsion (ABLE) in comparison with that of liposomal formulation (LAmB). METHODS: In this multicentric, open-label study, 500 patients with VL were randomly assigned in a 3∶1 ratio to receive 15 mg/kg single infusion of either ABLE (N = 376) or LAmB (N = 124). Initial cure (Day 30/45), clinical improvement (Day 30) and long term definitive cure (Day 180) were assessed. FINDINGS: A total of 326 (86.7%) patients in the ABLE group and 122 (98.4%) patients in the LAmB group completed the study. Initial cure was achieved by 95.9% of patients in the ABLE group compared to 100% in the LAmB group (p = 0.028; 95% CI: −0.0663, −0.0150). Clinical improvement was comparable between treatments (ABLE: 98.9% vs. LAmB: 98.4%). Definitive cure was achieved in 85.9% with ABLE compared to 98.4% with LAmB. Infusion-related pyrexia (37.2% vs. 32.3%) and chills (18.4% vs. 18.5%) were comparable between ABLE and LAmB, respectively. Treatment-related serious adverse events were fewer in ABLE (0.3%) compared to LAmB (1.6%). Two deaths occurred in the ABLE group, of which one was probably related to the study drug. Nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity was not observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: ABLE 15 mg/kg single infusion had favorable efficacy and was well tolerated. Considering the demographic profile of the population in this region, a single dose treatment offers advantages in terms of compliance, cost and applicability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00876824 Public Library of Science 2014-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4169371/ /pubmed/25233346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003169 Text en © 2014 Sundar et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sundar, Shyam Pandey, Krishna Thakur, Chandreshwar Prasad Jha, Tara Kant Das, Vidya Nand Ravi Verma, Neena Lal, Chandra Shekhar Verma, Deepak Alam, Shahnawaz Das, Pradeep Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Emulsion versus Liposomal Formulation in Indian Patients with Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Randomized, Open-Label Study |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Emulsion versus Liposomal Formulation in Indian Patients with Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Randomized, Open-Label Study |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Emulsion versus Liposomal Formulation in Indian Patients with Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Randomized, Open-Label Study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Emulsion versus Liposomal Formulation in Indian Patients with Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Randomized, Open-Label Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Emulsion versus Liposomal Formulation in Indian Patients with Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Randomized, Open-Label Study |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B Emulsion versus Liposomal Formulation in Indian Patients with Visceral Leishmaniasis: A Randomized, Open-Label Study |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of amphotericin b emulsion versus liposomal formulation in indian patients with visceral leishmaniasis: a randomized, open-label study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25233346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003169 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sundarshyam efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy AT pandeykrishna efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy AT thakurchandreshwarprasad efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy AT jhatarakant efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy AT dasvidyanandravi efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy AT vermaneena efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy AT lalchandrashekhar efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy AT vermadeepak efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy AT alamshahnawaz efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy AT daspradeep efficacyandsafetyofamphotericinbemulsionversusliposomalformulationinindianpatientswithvisceralleishmaniasisarandomizedopenlabelstudy |