Cargando…

Sensorimotor Modulation Differs with Load Type during Constant Finger Force or Position

During submaximal isometric contraction, there are two different load types: production of a constant force against a rigid restraint (force task), and maintenance of position against a constant load (position task). Previous studies reported that the time to task failure during a fatigue task was t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirimoto, Hikari, Tamaki, Hiroyuki, Suzuki, Makoto, Matsumoto, Takuya, Sugawara, Kazuhiro, Kojima, Syo, Onishi, Hideaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25233353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108058
_version_ 1782335707968176128
author Kirimoto, Hikari
Tamaki, Hiroyuki
Suzuki, Makoto
Matsumoto, Takuya
Sugawara, Kazuhiro
Kojima, Syo
Onishi, Hideaki
author_facet Kirimoto, Hikari
Tamaki, Hiroyuki
Suzuki, Makoto
Matsumoto, Takuya
Sugawara, Kazuhiro
Kojima, Syo
Onishi, Hideaki
author_sort Kirimoto, Hikari
collection PubMed
description During submaximal isometric contraction, there are two different load types: production of a constant force against a rigid restraint (force task), and maintenance of position against a constant load (position task). Previous studies reported that the time to task failure during a fatigue task was twice as long in the force task compared with the position task. Sensory feedback processing may contribute to these differences. The purpose of the current study was to determine the influence of load types during static muscle contraction tasks on the gating effect, i.e., attenuation of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) and the cortical silent period (cSP). Ten healthy subjects contracted their right first dorsal interosseus muscle by abducting their index finger for 90 s, to produce a constant force against a rigid restraint that was 20% of the maximum voluntary contraction (force task), or to maintain a constant position with 10° abduction of the metacarpophalangeal joint against the same load (position task). Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were recorded from C3′ by stimulating either the right ulnar or median nerve at the wrist while maintaining contraction. The cortical silent period (cSP) was also elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Reduction of the amplitude of the P45 component of SEPs was significantly larger during the position task than during the force task and under control rest conditions when the ulnar nerve, but not the median nerve, was stimulated. The position task had a significantly shorter cSP duration than the force task. These results suggest the need for more proprioceptive information during the position task than the force task. The shorter duration of the cSP during the position task may be attributable to larger amplitude of heteronymous short latency reflexes. Sensorimotor modulations may differ with load type during constant finger force or position tasks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4169486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41694862014-09-22 Sensorimotor Modulation Differs with Load Type during Constant Finger Force or Position Kirimoto, Hikari Tamaki, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Makoto Matsumoto, Takuya Sugawara, Kazuhiro Kojima, Syo Onishi, Hideaki PLoS One Research Article During submaximal isometric contraction, there are two different load types: production of a constant force against a rigid restraint (force task), and maintenance of position against a constant load (position task). Previous studies reported that the time to task failure during a fatigue task was twice as long in the force task compared with the position task. Sensory feedback processing may contribute to these differences. The purpose of the current study was to determine the influence of load types during static muscle contraction tasks on the gating effect, i.e., attenuation of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) and the cortical silent period (cSP). Ten healthy subjects contracted their right first dorsal interosseus muscle by abducting their index finger for 90 s, to produce a constant force against a rigid restraint that was 20% of the maximum voluntary contraction (force task), or to maintain a constant position with 10° abduction of the metacarpophalangeal joint against the same load (position task). Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were recorded from C3′ by stimulating either the right ulnar or median nerve at the wrist while maintaining contraction. The cortical silent period (cSP) was also elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Reduction of the amplitude of the P45 component of SEPs was significantly larger during the position task than during the force task and under control rest conditions when the ulnar nerve, but not the median nerve, was stimulated. The position task had a significantly shorter cSP duration than the force task. These results suggest the need for more proprioceptive information during the position task than the force task. The shorter duration of the cSP during the position task may be attributable to larger amplitude of heteronymous short latency reflexes. Sensorimotor modulations may differ with load type during constant finger force or position tasks. Public Library of Science 2014-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4169486/ /pubmed/25233353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108058 Text en © 2014 Kirimoto et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kirimoto, Hikari
Tamaki, Hiroyuki
Suzuki, Makoto
Matsumoto, Takuya
Sugawara, Kazuhiro
Kojima, Syo
Onishi, Hideaki
Sensorimotor Modulation Differs with Load Type during Constant Finger Force or Position
title Sensorimotor Modulation Differs with Load Type during Constant Finger Force or Position
title_full Sensorimotor Modulation Differs with Load Type during Constant Finger Force or Position
title_fullStr Sensorimotor Modulation Differs with Load Type during Constant Finger Force or Position
title_full_unstemmed Sensorimotor Modulation Differs with Load Type during Constant Finger Force or Position
title_short Sensorimotor Modulation Differs with Load Type during Constant Finger Force or Position
title_sort sensorimotor modulation differs with load type during constant finger force or position
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25233353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108058
work_keys_str_mv AT kirimotohikari sensorimotormodulationdifferswithloadtypeduringconstantfingerforceorposition
AT tamakihiroyuki sensorimotormodulationdifferswithloadtypeduringconstantfingerforceorposition
AT suzukimakoto sensorimotormodulationdifferswithloadtypeduringconstantfingerforceorposition
AT matsumototakuya sensorimotormodulationdifferswithloadtypeduringconstantfingerforceorposition
AT sugawarakazuhiro sensorimotormodulationdifferswithloadtypeduringconstantfingerforceorposition
AT kojimasyo sensorimotormodulationdifferswithloadtypeduringconstantfingerforceorposition
AT onishihideaki sensorimotormodulationdifferswithloadtypeduringconstantfingerforceorposition