Cargando…

Bed-Sharing in the Absence of Hazardous Circumstances: Is There a Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome? An Analysis from Two Case-Control Studies Conducted in the UK

OBJECTIVE: The risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) among infants who co-sleep in the absence of hazardous circumstances is unclear and needs to be quantified. DESIGN: Combined individual-analysis of two population-based case-control studies of SIDS infants and controls comparable for age and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blair, Peter S., Sidebotham, Peter, Pease, Anna, Fleming, Peter J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25238618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107799
_version_ 1782335726253244416
author Blair, Peter S.
Sidebotham, Peter
Pease, Anna
Fleming, Peter J.
author_facet Blair, Peter S.
Sidebotham, Peter
Pease, Anna
Fleming, Peter J.
author_sort Blair, Peter S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) among infants who co-sleep in the absence of hazardous circumstances is unclear and needs to be quantified. DESIGN: Combined individual-analysis of two population-based case-control studies of SIDS infants and controls comparable for age and time of last sleep. SETTING: Parents of 400 SIDS infants and 1386 controls provided information from five English health regions between 1993–6 (population: 17.7 million) and one of these regions between 2003–6 (population:4.9 million). RESULTS: Over a third of SIDS infants (36%) were found co-sleeping with an adult at the time of death compared to 15% of control infants after the reference sleep (multivariate OR = 3.9 [95% CI: 2.7–5.6]). The multivariable risk associated with co-sleeping on a sofa (OR = 18.3 [95% CI: 7.1–47.4]) or next to a parent who drank more than two units of alcohol (OR = 18.3 [95% CI: 7.7–43.5]) was very high and significant for infants of all ages. The risk associated with co-sleeping next to someone who smoked was significant for infants under 3 months old (OR = 8.9 [95% CI: 5.3–15.1]) but not for older infants (OR = 1.4 [95% CI: 0.7–2.8]). The multivariable risk associated with bed-sharing in the absence of these hazards was not significant overall (OR = 1.1 [95% CI: 0.6–2.0]), for infants less than 3 months old (OR = 1.6 [95% CI: 0.96–2.7]), and was in the direction of protection for older infants (OR = 0.1 [95% CI: 0.01–0.5]). Dummy use was associated with a lower risk of SIDS only among co-sleepers and prone sleeping was a higher risk only among infants sleeping alone. CONCLUSION: These findings support a public health strategy that underlines specific hazardous co-sleeping environments parents should avoid. Sofa-sharing is not a safe alternative to bed-sharing and bed-sharing should be avoided if parents consume alcohol, smoke or take drugs or if the infant is pre-term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4169572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41695722014-09-22 Bed-Sharing in the Absence of Hazardous Circumstances: Is There a Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome? An Analysis from Two Case-Control Studies Conducted in the UK Blair, Peter S. Sidebotham, Peter Pease, Anna Fleming, Peter J. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) among infants who co-sleep in the absence of hazardous circumstances is unclear and needs to be quantified. DESIGN: Combined individual-analysis of two population-based case-control studies of SIDS infants and controls comparable for age and time of last sleep. SETTING: Parents of 400 SIDS infants and 1386 controls provided information from five English health regions between 1993–6 (population: 17.7 million) and one of these regions between 2003–6 (population:4.9 million). RESULTS: Over a third of SIDS infants (36%) were found co-sleeping with an adult at the time of death compared to 15% of control infants after the reference sleep (multivariate OR = 3.9 [95% CI: 2.7–5.6]). The multivariable risk associated with co-sleeping on a sofa (OR = 18.3 [95% CI: 7.1–47.4]) or next to a parent who drank more than two units of alcohol (OR = 18.3 [95% CI: 7.7–43.5]) was very high and significant for infants of all ages. The risk associated with co-sleeping next to someone who smoked was significant for infants under 3 months old (OR = 8.9 [95% CI: 5.3–15.1]) but not for older infants (OR = 1.4 [95% CI: 0.7–2.8]). The multivariable risk associated with bed-sharing in the absence of these hazards was not significant overall (OR = 1.1 [95% CI: 0.6–2.0]), for infants less than 3 months old (OR = 1.6 [95% CI: 0.96–2.7]), and was in the direction of protection for older infants (OR = 0.1 [95% CI: 0.01–0.5]). Dummy use was associated with a lower risk of SIDS only among co-sleepers and prone sleeping was a higher risk only among infants sleeping alone. CONCLUSION: These findings support a public health strategy that underlines specific hazardous co-sleeping environments parents should avoid. Sofa-sharing is not a safe alternative to bed-sharing and bed-sharing should be avoided if parents consume alcohol, smoke or take drugs or if the infant is pre-term. Public Library of Science 2014-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4169572/ /pubmed/25238618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107799 Text en © 2014 Blair et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blair, Peter S.
Sidebotham, Peter
Pease, Anna
Fleming, Peter J.
Bed-Sharing in the Absence of Hazardous Circumstances: Is There a Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome? An Analysis from Two Case-Control Studies Conducted in the UK
title Bed-Sharing in the Absence of Hazardous Circumstances: Is There a Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome? An Analysis from Two Case-Control Studies Conducted in the UK
title_full Bed-Sharing in the Absence of Hazardous Circumstances: Is There a Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome? An Analysis from Two Case-Control Studies Conducted in the UK
title_fullStr Bed-Sharing in the Absence of Hazardous Circumstances: Is There a Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome? An Analysis from Two Case-Control Studies Conducted in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Bed-Sharing in the Absence of Hazardous Circumstances: Is There a Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome? An Analysis from Two Case-Control Studies Conducted in the UK
title_short Bed-Sharing in the Absence of Hazardous Circumstances: Is There a Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome? An Analysis from Two Case-Control Studies Conducted in the UK
title_sort bed-sharing in the absence of hazardous circumstances: is there a risk of sudden infant death syndrome? an analysis from two case-control studies conducted in the uk
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25238618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107799
work_keys_str_mv AT blairpeters bedsharingintheabsenceofhazardouscircumstancesisthereariskofsuddeninfantdeathsyndromeananalysisfromtwocasecontrolstudiesconductedintheuk
AT sidebothampeter bedsharingintheabsenceofhazardouscircumstancesisthereariskofsuddeninfantdeathsyndromeananalysisfromtwocasecontrolstudiesconductedintheuk
AT peaseanna bedsharingintheabsenceofhazardouscircumstancesisthereariskofsuddeninfantdeathsyndromeananalysisfromtwocasecontrolstudiesconductedintheuk
AT flemingpeterj bedsharingintheabsenceofhazardouscircumstancesisthereariskofsuddeninfantdeathsyndromeananalysisfromtwocasecontrolstudiesconductedintheuk