Cargando…

Continuous paravertebral block for postoperative pain compared to general anaesthesia and wound infiltration for major oncological breast surgery

We hypothesized that improved acute postoperative pain relief will be achieved using general anaesthesia (GA) either in combination with continuous thoracic paravertebral block (GA-cPVB) or single shot (GA-sPVB) as compared to GA supplemented by local wound infiltration (GA-LWI) after unilateral maj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouman, Esther A C, Theunissen, Maurice, Kessels, Alfons GH, Keymeulen, Kristien BMI, Joosten, Elbert AJ, Marcus, Marco AE, Buhre, Wolfgang F, Gramke, Hans-Fritz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25279309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-517
_version_ 1782335761116299264
author Bouman, Esther A C
Theunissen, Maurice
Kessels, Alfons GH
Keymeulen, Kristien BMI
Joosten, Elbert AJ
Marcus, Marco AE
Buhre, Wolfgang F
Gramke, Hans-Fritz
author_facet Bouman, Esther A C
Theunissen, Maurice
Kessels, Alfons GH
Keymeulen, Kristien BMI
Joosten, Elbert AJ
Marcus, Marco AE
Buhre, Wolfgang F
Gramke, Hans-Fritz
author_sort Bouman, Esther A C
collection PubMed
description We hypothesized that improved acute postoperative pain relief will be achieved using general anaesthesia (GA) either in combination with continuous thoracic paravertebral block (GA-cPVB) or single shot (GA-sPVB) as compared to GA supplemented by local wound infiltration (GA-LWI) after unilateral major breast cancer surgery. A randomised controlled trial was conducted in 46 adult women in a day-care or short-stay hospital setting after major breast cancer surgery. Pain-intensity was measured using an 11-point visual analogue scale (VAS) until postoperative day 2. GA-sPVB was stopped due to slow inclusion. No significant difference in VAS score was noted between GA-LWI (VAS median 0.5 (interquartile range 0.18–2.00)) and GA-cPVB, (VAS 0.3 (0.00–1.55, p = 0.195)) 24 hours after surgery or at any point postoperatively until postoperative day 2. We conclude that both GA-LWI and GA-cPVB anaesthetic techniques are equally effective in treatment of acute postoperative pain after major oncological breast surgery. As GA-LWI is easily to perform with fewer complications and it is more cost-effective it should be preferred over GA-cPVB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4169785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41697852014-10-02 Continuous paravertebral block for postoperative pain compared to general anaesthesia and wound infiltration for major oncological breast surgery Bouman, Esther A C Theunissen, Maurice Kessels, Alfons GH Keymeulen, Kristien BMI Joosten, Elbert AJ Marcus, Marco AE Buhre, Wolfgang F Gramke, Hans-Fritz Springerplus Research We hypothesized that improved acute postoperative pain relief will be achieved using general anaesthesia (GA) either in combination with continuous thoracic paravertebral block (GA-cPVB) or single shot (GA-sPVB) as compared to GA supplemented by local wound infiltration (GA-LWI) after unilateral major breast cancer surgery. A randomised controlled trial was conducted in 46 adult women in a day-care or short-stay hospital setting after major breast cancer surgery. Pain-intensity was measured using an 11-point visual analogue scale (VAS) until postoperative day 2. GA-sPVB was stopped due to slow inclusion. No significant difference in VAS score was noted between GA-LWI (VAS median 0.5 (interquartile range 0.18–2.00)) and GA-cPVB, (VAS 0.3 (0.00–1.55, p = 0.195)) 24 hours after surgery or at any point postoperatively until postoperative day 2. We conclude that both GA-LWI and GA-cPVB anaesthetic techniques are equally effective in treatment of acute postoperative pain after major oncological breast surgery. As GA-LWI is easily to perform with fewer complications and it is more cost-effective it should be preferred over GA-cPVB. Springer International Publishing 2014-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4169785/ /pubmed/25279309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-517 Text en © Bouman et al.; licensee Springer. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Bouman, Esther A C
Theunissen, Maurice
Kessels, Alfons GH
Keymeulen, Kristien BMI
Joosten, Elbert AJ
Marcus, Marco AE
Buhre, Wolfgang F
Gramke, Hans-Fritz
Continuous paravertebral block for postoperative pain compared to general anaesthesia and wound infiltration for major oncological breast surgery
title Continuous paravertebral block for postoperative pain compared to general anaesthesia and wound infiltration for major oncological breast surgery
title_full Continuous paravertebral block for postoperative pain compared to general anaesthesia and wound infiltration for major oncological breast surgery
title_fullStr Continuous paravertebral block for postoperative pain compared to general anaesthesia and wound infiltration for major oncological breast surgery
title_full_unstemmed Continuous paravertebral block for postoperative pain compared to general anaesthesia and wound infiltration for major oncological breast surgery
title_short Continuous paravertebral block for postoperative pain compared to general anaesthesia and wound infiltration for major oncological breast surgery
title_sort continuous paravertebral block for postoperative pain compared to general anaesthesia and wound infiltration for major oncological breast surgery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25279309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-517
work_keys_str_mv AT boumanestherac continuousparavertebralblockforpostoperativepaincomparedtogeneralanaesthesiaandwoundinfiltrationformajoroncologicalbreastsurgery
AT theunissenmaurice continuousparavertebralblockforpostoperativepaincomparedtogeneralanaesthesiaandwoundinfiltrationformajoroncologicalbreastsurgery
AT kesselsalfonsgh continuousparavertebralblockforpostoperativepaincomparedtogeneralanaesthesiaandwoundinfiltrationformajoroncologicalbreastsurgery
AT keymeulenkristienbmi continuousparavertebralblockforpostoperativepaincomparedtogeneralanaesthesiaandwoundinfiltrationformajoroncologicalbreastsurgery
AT joostenelbertaj continuousparavertebralblockforpostoperativepaincomparedtogeneralanaesthesiaandwoundinfiltrationformajoroncologicalbreastsurgery
AT marcusmarcoae continuousparavertebralblockforpostoperativepaincomparedtogeneralanaesthesiaandwoundinfiltrationformajoroncologicalbreastsurgery
AT buhrewolfgangf continuousparavertebralblockforpostoperativepaincomparedtogeneralanaesthesiaandwoundinfiltrationformajoroncologicalbreastsurgery
AT gramkehansfritz continuousparavertebralblockforpostoperativepaincomparedtogeneralanaesthesiaandwoundinfiltrationformajoroncologicalbreastsurgery