Cargando…

Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND: The potential impact of an influenza pandemic can be assessed by calculating a set of transmissibility parameters, the most important being the reproduction number (R), which is defined as the average number of secondary cases generated per typical infectious case. METHODS: We conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biggerstaff, Matthew, Cauchemez, Simon, Reed, Carrie, Gambhir, Manoj, Finelli, Lyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25186370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-480
_version_ 1782335767685627904
author Biggerstaff, Matthew
Cauchemez, Simon
Reed, Carrie
Gambhir, Manoj
Finelli, Lyn
author_facet Biggerstaff, Matthew
Cauchemez, Simon
Reed, Carrie
Gambhir, Manoj
Finelli, Lyn
author_sort Biggerstaff, Matthew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The potential impact of an influenza pandemic can be assessed by calculating a set of transmissibility parameters, the most important being the reproduction number (R), which is defined as the average number of secondary cases generated per typical infectious case. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to summarize published estimates of R for pandemic or seasonal influenza and for novel influenza viruses (e.g. H5N1). We retained and summarized papers that estimated R for pandemic or seasonal influenza or for human infections with novel influenza viruses. RESULTS: The search yielded 567 papers. Ninety-one papers were retained, and an additional twenty papers were identified from the references of the retained papers. Twenty-four studies reported 51 R values for the 1918 pandemic. The median R value for 1918 was 1.80 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.47–2.27). Six studies reported seven 1957 pandemic R values. The median R value for 1957 was 1.65 (IQR: 1.53–1.70). Four studies reported seven 1968 pandemic R values. The median R value for 1968 was 1.80 (IQR: 1.56–1.85). Fifty-seven studies reported 78 2009 pandemic R values. The median R value for 2009 was 1.46 (IQR: 1.30–1.70) and was similar across the two waves of illness: 1.46 for the first wave and 1.48 for the second wave. Twenty-four studies reported 47 seasonal epidemic R values. The median R value for seasonal influenza was 1.28 (IQR: 1.19–1.37). Four studies reported six novel influenza R values. Four out of six R values were <1. CONCLUSIONS: These R values represent the difference between epidemics that are controllable and cause moderate illness and those causing a significant number of illnesses and requiring intensive mitigation strategies to control. Continued monitoring of R during seasonal and novel influenza outbreaks is needed to document its variation before the next pandemic. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-480) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4169819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41698192014-09-22 Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature Biggerstaff, Matthew Cauchemez, Simon Reed, Carrie Gambhir, Manoj Finelli, Lyn BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The potential impact of an influenza pandemic can be assessed by calculating a set of transmissibility parameters, the most important being the reproduction number (R), which is defined as the average number of secondary cases generated per typical infectious case. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to summarize published estimates of R for pandemic or seasonal influenza and for novel influenza viruses (e.g. H5N1). We retained and summarized papers that estimated R for pandemic or seasonal influenza or for human infections with novel influenza viruses. RESULTS: The search yielded 567 papers. Ninety-one papers were retained, and an additional twenty papers were identified from the references of the retained papers. Twenty-four studies reported 51 R values for the 1918 pandemic. The median R value for 1918 was 1.80 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.47–2.27). Six studies reported seven 1957 pandemic R values. The median R value for 1957 was 1.65 (IQR: 1.53–1.70). Four studies reported seven 1968 pandemic R values. The median R value for 1968 was 1.80 (IQR: 1.56–1.85). Fifty-seven studies reported 78 2009 pandemic R values. The median R value for 2009 was 1.46 (IQR: 1.30–1.70) and was similar across the two waves of illness: 1.46 for the first wave and 1.48 for the second wave. Twenty-four studies reported 47 seasonal epidemic R values. The median R value for seasonal influenza was 1.28 (IQR: 1.19–1.37). Four studies reported six novel influenza R values. Four out of six R values were <1. CONCLUSIONS: These R values represent the difference between epidemics that are controllable and cause moderate illness and those causing a significant number of illnesses and requiring intensive mitigation strategies to control. Continued monitoring of R during seasonal and novel influenza outbreaks is needed to document its variation before the next pandemic. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-480) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4169819/ /pubmed/25186370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-480 Text en © Biggerstaff et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Biggerstaff, Matthew
Cauchemez, Simon
Reed, Carrie
Gambhir, Manoj
Finelli, Lyn
Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature
title Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature
title_full Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature
title_short Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature
title_sort estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25186370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-480
work_keys_str_mv AT biggerstaffmatthew estimatesofthereproductionnumberforseasonalpandemicandzoonoticinfluenzaasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT cauchemezsimon estimatesofthereproductionnumberforseasonalpandemicandzoonoticinfluenzaasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT reedcarrie estimatesofthereproductionnumberforseasonalpandemicandzoonoticinfluenzaasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT gambhirmanoj estimatesofthereproductionnumberforseasonalpandemicandzoonoticinfluenzaasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT finellilyn estimatesofthereproductionnumberforseasonalpandemicandzoonoticinfluenzaasystematicreviewoftheliterature