Cargando…
Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature
BACKGROUND: The potential impact of an influenza pandemic can be assessed by calculating a set of transmissibility parameters, the most important being the reproduction number (R), which is defined as the average number of secondary cases generated per typical infectious case. METHODS: We conducted...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25186370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-480 |
_version_ | 1782335767685627904 |
---|---|
author | Biggerstaff, Matthew Cauchemez, Simon Reed, Carrie Gambhir, Manoj Finelli, Lyn |
author_facet | Biggerstaff, Matthew Cauchemez, Simon Reed, Carrie Gambhir, Manoj Finelli, Lyn |
author_sort | Biggerstaff, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The potential impact of an influenza pandemic can be assessed by calculating a set of transmissibility parameters, the most important being the reproduction number (R), which is defined as the average number of secondary cases generated per typical infectious case. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to summarize published estimates of R for pandemic or seasonal influenza and for novel influenza viruses (e.g. H5N1). We retained and summarized papers that estimated R for pandemic or seasonal influenza or for human infections with novel influenza viruses. RESULTS: The search yielded 567 papers. Ninety-one papers were retained, and an additional twenty papers were identified from the references of the retained papers. Twenty-four studies reported 51 R values for the 1918 pandemic. The median R value for 1918 was 1.80 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.47–2.27). Six studies reported seven 1957 pandemic R values. The median R value for 1957 was 1.65 (IQR: 1.53–1.70). Four studies reported seven 1968 pandemic R values. The median R value for 1968 was 1.80 (IQR: 1.56–1.85). Fifty-seven studies reported 78 2009 pandemic R values. The median R value for 2009 was 1.46 (IQR: 1.30–1.70) and was similar across the two waves of illness: 1.46 for the first wave and 1.48 for the second wave. Twenty-four studies reported 47 seasonal epidemic R values. The median R value for seasonal influenza was 1.28 (IQR: 1.19–1.37). Four studies reported six novel influenza R values. Four out of six R values were <1. CONCLUSIONS: These R values represent the difference between epidemics that are controllable and cause moderate illness and those causing a significant number of illnesses and requiring intensive mitigation strategies to control. Continued monitoring of R during seasonal and novel influenza outbreaks is needed to document its variation before the next pandemic. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-480) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4169819 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41698192014-09-22 Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature Biggerstaff, Matthew Cauchemez, Simon Reed, Carrie Gambhir, Manoj Finelli, Lyn BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The potential impact of an influenza pandemic can be assessed by calculating a set of transmissibility parameters, the most important being the reproduction number (R), which is defined as the average number of secondary cases generated per typical infectious case. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to summarize published estimates of R for pandemic or seasonal influenza and for novel influenza viruses (e.g. H5N1). We retained and summarized papers that estimated R for pandemic or seasonal influenza or for human infections with novel influenza viruses. RESULTS: The search yielded 567 papers. Ninety-one papers were retained, and an additional twenty papers were identified from the references of the retained papers. Twenty-four studies reported 51 R values for the 1918 pandemic. The median R value for 1918 was 1.80 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.47–2.27). Six studies reported seven 1957 pandemic R values. The median R value for 1957 was 1.65 (IQR: 1.53–1.70). Four studies reported seven 1968 pandemic R values. The median R value for 1968 was 1.80 (IQR: 1.56–1.85). Fifty-seven studies reported 78 2009 pandemic R values. The median R value for 2009 was 1.46 (IQR: 1.30–1.70) and was similar across the two waves of illness: 1.46 for the first wave and 1.48 for the second wave. Twenty-four studies reported 47 seasonal epidemic R values. The median R value for seasonal influenza was 1.28 (IQR: 1.19–1.37). Four studies reported six novel influenza R values. Four out of six R values were <1. CONCLUSIONS: These R values represent the difference between epidemics that are controllable and cause moderate illness and those causing a significant number of illnesses and requiring intensive mitigation strategies to control. Continued monitoring of R during seasonal and novel influenza outbreaks is needed to document its variation before the next pandemic. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-480) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4169819/ /pubmed/25186370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-480 Text en © Biggerstaff et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Biggerstaff, Matthew Cauchemez, Simon Reed, Carrie Gambhir, Manoj Finelli, Lyn Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature |
title | Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature |
title_full | Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature |
title_fullStr | Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature |
title_short | Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature |
title_sort | estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25186370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-480 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biggerstaffmatthew estimatesofthereproductionnumberforseasonalpandemicandzoonoticinfluenzaasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT cauchemezsimon estimatesofthereproductionnumberforseasonalpandemicandzoonoticinfluenzaasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT reedcarrie estimatesofthereproductionnumberforseasonalpandemicandzoonoticinfluenzaasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT gambhirmanoj estimatesofthereproductionnumberforseasonalpandemicandzoonoticinfluenzaasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT finellilyn estimatesofthereproductionnumberforseasonalpandemicandzoonoticinfluenzaasystematicreviewoftheliterature |