Cargando…

The efficacy of recombinant versus urinary HCG in ART outcome

Background: Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) has been used as a replacement for the mid-cycle luteinizing hormone (LH) surge for several years. The recent arrival of recombinant DNA technology has made recombinant HCG (rHCG) accessible. Objective: To assess efficacy of rHCG compared to urinary HCG...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eftekhar, Maryam, Khalili, Mohammad Ali, Rahmani, Elham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Research and Clinical Center for Infertility 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25246924
_version_ 1782335774248665088
author Eftekhar, Maryam
Khalili, Mohammad Ali
Rahmani, Elham
author_facet Eftekhar, Maryam
Khalili, Mohammad Ali
Rahmani, Elham
author_sort Eftekhar, Maryam
collection PubMed
description Background: Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) has been used as a replacement for the mid-cycle luteinizing hormone (LH) surge for several years. The recent arrival of recombinant DNA technology has made recombinant HCG (rHCG) accessible. Objective: To assess efficacy of rHCG compared to urinary HCG (uHCG) for triggering of ovulation and induction of final oocyte maturation in assisted reproductive cycles. Materials and Methods: 200 patients who were candidate for ICSI were randomly divided in two groups. In group I (rHCG), patients received 250µg of rHCG for final oocyte maturation, and in group II (uHCG) the patients received 10000 IU of uHCG. Measured outcomes were number of retrieved oocyte and mature oocyte, maturation rate of oocyte, fertilization rate and clinical pregnancy rate. Results: The rates of oocyte maturity were similar in both groups. Fertilization rate was similar in two groups (58.58% in rHCG group versus 60.58% in uHCG group p=0.666). The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was similar in both group 34.0% in rHCG group versus 39% in uHCG group (p=0.310). Conclusion: We demonstrated that rHCG is as effective as uHCG, when it is used for final oocyte maturation in ICSI cycles. The numbers of retrieved oocyte and maturation rates were similar in both groups; also fertilization and clinical pregnancy rates were similar.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4169847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Research and Clinical Center for Infertility
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41698472014-09-22 The efficacy of recombinant versus urinary HCG in ART outcome Eftekhar, Maryam Khalili, Mohammad Ali Rahmani, Elham Iran J Reprod Med Original Article Background: Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) has been used as a replacement for the mid-cycle luteinizing hormone (LH) surge for several years. The recent arrival of recombinant DNA technology has made recombinant HCG (rHCG) accessible. Objective: To assess efficacy of rHCG compared to urinary HCG (uHCG) for triggering of ovulation and induction of final oocyte maturation in assisted reproductive cycles. Materials and Methods: 200 patients who were candidate for ICSI were randomly divided in two groups. In group I (rHCG), patients received 250µg of rHCG for final oocyte maturation, and in group II (uHCG) the patients received 10000 IU of uHCG. Measured outcomes were number of retrieved oocyte and mature oocyte, maturation rate of oocyte, fertilization rate and clinical pregnancy rate. Results: The rates of oocyte maturity were similar in both groups. Fertilization rate was similar in two groups (58.58% in rHCG group versus 60.58% in uHCG group p=0.666). The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was similar in both group 34.0% in rHCG group versus 39% in uHCG group (p=0.310). Conclusion: We demonstrated that rHCG is as effective as uHCG, when it is used for final oocyte maturation in ICSI cycles. The numbers of retrieved oocyte and maturation rates were similar in both groups; also fertilization and clinical pregnancy rates were similar. Research and Clinical Center for Infertility 2012-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4169847/ /pubmed/25246924 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Eftekhar, Maryam
Khalili, Mohammad Ali
Rahmani, Elham
The efficacy of recombinant versus urinary HCG in ART outcome
title The efficacy of recombinant versus urinary HCG in ART outcome
title_full The efficacy of recombinant versus urinary HCG in ART outcome
title_fullStr The efficacy of recombinant versus urinary HCG in ART outcome
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of recombinant versus urinary HCG in ART outcome
title_short The efficacy of recombinant versus urinary HCG in ART outcome
title_sort efficacy of recombinant versus urinary hcg in art outcome
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25246924
work_keys_str_mv AT eftekharmaryam theefficacyofrecombinantversusurinaryhcginartoutcome
AT khalilimohammadali theefficacyofrecombinantversusurinaryhcginartoutcome
AT rahmanielham theefficacyofrecombinantversusurinaryhcginartoutcome
AT eftekharmaryam efficacyofrecombinantversusurinaryhcginartoutcome
AT khalilimohammadali efficacyofrecombinantversusurinaryhcginartoutcome
AT rahmanielham efficacyofrecombinantversusurinaryhcginartoutcome