Cargando…
Hepatic Arterial Phase on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MR Imaging: A Randomized Comparison of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s Injection Rates
OBJECTIVE: To compare gadoxetic acid injection rates of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s for hepatic arterial-phase magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 101 consecutive patients with suspected focal liver lesions were included and randomly divided into two groups. Ea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Radiology
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25246821 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.5.605 |
_version_ | 1782335797490352128 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Sung Mo Heo, Suk Hee Kim, Jin Woong Lim, Hyo Soon Shin, Sang Soo Jeong, Yong Yeon Kang, Heoung Keun |
author_facet | Kim, Sung Mo Heo, Suk Hee Kim, Jin Woong Lim, Hyo Soon Shin, Sang Soo Jeong, Yong Yeon Kang, Heoung Keun |
author_sort | Kim, Sung Mo |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare gadoxetic acid injection rates of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s for hepatic arterial-phase magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 101 consecutive patients with suspected focal liver lesions were included and randomly divided into two groups. Each group underwent dynamic liver MR imaging using a 3.0-T scanner after an intravenous injection of gadoxetic acid at rates of either 0.5 mL/s (n = 50) or 1 mL/s (n = 51). Arterial phase images were analyzed after blinding the injection rates. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the liver, aorta, portal vein, hepatic vein, spleen, and pancreas were measured. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) were calculated. Finally, two experienced radiologists were independently asked to identify, if any, HCCs in the liver on the images and score the image quality in terms of the presence of artifacts and the proper enhancement of the liver, aorta, portal vein, hepatic vein, hepatic artery, spleen, pancreas, and kidney. RESULTS: The SNRs were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.233-0.965). The CNRs of the HCCs were not significantly different (p = 0.597). The sensitivity for HCC detection and the image quality scores were not significantly different between the two injection rates (p = 0.082-1.000). CONCLUSION: Image quality and sensitivity for hepatic HCCs of arterial-phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR were not significantly improved by reducing the contrast injection rate to 0.5 mL/s compared with 1 mL/s. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4170161 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Radiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41701612014-09-22 Hepatic Arterial Phase on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MR Imaging: A Randomized Comparison of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s Injection Rates Kim, Sung Mo Heo, Suk Hee Kim, Jin Woong Lim, Hyo Soon Shin, Sang Soo Jeong, Yong Yeon Kang, Heoung Keun Korean J Radiol Gastrointestinal Imaging OBJECTIVE: To compare gadoxetic acid injection rates of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s for hepatic arterial-phase magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 101 consecutive patients with suspected focal liver lesions were included and randomly divided into two groups. Each group underwent dynamic liver MR imaging using a 3.0-T scanner after an intravenous injection of gadoxetic acid at rates of either 0.5 mL/s (n = 50) or 1 mL/s (n = 51). Arterial phase images were analyzed after blinding the injection rates. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the liver, aorta, portal vein, hepatic vein, spleen, and pancreas were measured. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) were calculated. Finally, two experienced radiologists were independently asked to identify, if any, HCCs in the liver on the images and score the image quality in terms of the presence of artifacts and the proper enhancement of the liver, aorta, portal vein, hepatic vein, hepatic artery, spleen, pancreas, and kidney. RESULTS: The SNRs were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.233-0.965). The CNRs of the HCCs were not significantly different (p = 0.597). The sensitivity for HCC detection and the image quality scores were not significantly different between the two injection rates (p = 0.082-1.000). CONCLUSION: Image quality and sensitivity for hepatic HCCs of arterial-phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR were not significantly improved by reducing the contrast injection rate to 0.5 mL/s compared with 1 mL/s. The Korean Society of Radiology 2014 2014-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4170161/ /pubmed/25246821 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.5.605 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Gastrointestinal Imaging Kim, Sung Mo Heo, Suk Hee Kim, Jin Woong Lim, Hyo Soon Shin, Sang Soo Jeong, Yong Yeon Kang, Heoung Keun Hepatic Arterial Phase on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MR Imaging: A Randomized Comparison of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s Injection Rates |
title | Hepatic Arterial Phase on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MR Imaging: A Randomized Comparison of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s Injection Rates |
title_full | Hepatic Arterial Phase on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MR Imaging: A Randomized Comparison of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s Injection Rates |
title_fullStr | Hepatic Arterial Phase on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MR Imaging: A Randomized Comparison of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s Injection Rates |
title_full_unstemmed | Hepatic Arterial Phase on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MR Imaging: A Randomized Comparison of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s Injection Rates |
title_short | Hepatic Arterial Phase on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MR Imaging: A Randomized Comparison of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s Injection Rates |
title_sort | hepatic arterial phase on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver mr imaging: a randomized comparison of 0.5 ml/s and 1 ml/s injection rates |
topic | Gastrointestinal Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25246821 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.5.605 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimsungmo hepaticarterialphaseongadoxeticacidenhancedlivermrimagingarandomizedcomparisonof05mlsand1mlsinjectionrates AT heosukhee hepaticarterialphaseongadoxeticacidenhancedlivermrimagingarandomizedcomparisonof05mlsand1mlsinjectionrates AT kimjinwoong hepaticarterialphaseongadoxeticacidenhancedlivermrimagingarandomizedcomparisonof05mlsand1mlsinjectionrates AT limhyosoon hepaticarterialphaseongadoxeticacidenhancedlivermrimagingarandomizedcomparisonof05mlsand1mlsinjectionrates AT shinsangsoo hepaticarterialphaseongadoxeticacidenhancedlivermrimagingarandomizedcomparisonof05mlsand1mlsinjectionrates AT jeongyongyeon hepaticarterialphaseongadoxeticacidenhancedlivermrimagingarandomizedcomparisonof05mlsand1mlsinjectionrates AT kangheoungkeun hepaticarterialphaseongadoxeticacidenhancedlivermrimagingarandomizedcomparisonof05mlsand1mlsinjectionrates |