Cargando…

Hepatic Arterial Phase on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MR Imaging: A Randomized Comparison of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s Injection Rates

OBJECTIVE: To compare gadoxetic acid injection rates of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s for hepatic arterial-phase magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 101 consecutive patients with suspected focal liver lesions were included and randomly divided into two groups. Ea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Sung Mo, Heo, Suk Hee, Kim, Jin Woong, Lim, Hyo Soon, Shin, Sang Soo, Jeong, Yong Yeon, Kang, Heoung Keun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25246821
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.5.605
_version_ 1782335797490352128
author Kim, Sung Mo
Heo, Suk Hee
Kim, Jin Woong
Lim, Hyo Soon
Shin, Sang Soo
Jeong, Yong Yeon
Kang, Heoung Keun
author_facet Kim, Sung Mo
Heo, Suk Hee
Kim, Jin Woong
Lim, Hyo Soon
Shin, Sang Soo
Jeong, Yong Yeon
Kang, Heoung Keun
author_sort Kim, Sung Mo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare gadoxetic acid injection rates of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s for hepatic arterial-phase magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 101 consecutive patients with suspected focal liver lesions were included and randomly divided into two groups. Each group underwent dynamic liver MR imaging using a 3.0-T scanner after an intravenous injection of gadoxetic acid at rates of either 0.5 mL/s (n = 50) or 1 mL/s (n = 51). Arterial phase images were analyzed after blinding the injection rates. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the liver, aorta, portal vein, hepatic vein, spleen, and pancreas were measured. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) were calculated. Finally, two experienced radiologists were independently asked to identify, if any, HCCs in the liver on the images and score the image quality in terms of the presence of artifacts and the proper enhancement of the liver, aorta, portal vein, hepatic vein, hepatic artery, spleen, pancreas, and kidney. RESULTS: The SNRs were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.233-0.965). The CNRs of the HCCs were not significantly different (p = 0.597). The sensitivity for HCC detection and the image quality scores were not significantly different between the two injection rates (p = 0.082-1.000). CONCLUSION: Image quality and sensitivity for hepatic HCCs of arterial-phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR were not significantly improved by reducing the contrast injection rate to 0.5 mL/s compared with 1 mL/s.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4170161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41701612014-09-22 Hepatic Arterial Phase on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MR Imaging: A Randomized Comparison of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s Injection Rates Kim, Sung Mo Heo, Suk Hee Kim, Jin Woong Lim, Hyo Soon Shin, Sang Soo Jeong, Yong Yeon Kang, Heoung Keun Korean J Radiol Gastrointestinal Imaging OBJECTIVE: To compare gadoxetic acid injection rates of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s for hepatic arterial-phase magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 101 consecutive patients with suspected focal liver lesions were included and randomly divided into two groups. Each group underwent dynamic liver MR imaging using a 3.0-T scanner after an intravenous injection of gadoxetic acid at rates of either 0.5 mL/s (n = 50) or 1 mL/s (n = 51). Arterial phase images were analyzed after blinding the injection rates. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the liver, aorta, portal vein, hepatic vein, spleen, and pancreas were measured. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) were calculated. Finally, two experienced radiologists were independently asked to identify, if any, HCCs in the liver on the images and score the image quality in terms of the presence of artifacts and the proper enhancement of the liver, aorta, portal vein, hepatic vein, hepatic artery, spleen, pancreas, and kidney. RESULTS: The SNRs were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.233-0.965). The CNRs of the HCCs were not significantly different (p = 0.597). The sensitivity for HCC detection and the image quality scores were not significantly different between the two injection rates (p = 0.082-1.000). CONCLUSION: Image quality and sensitivity for hepatic HCCs of arterial-phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR were not significantly improved by reducing the contrast injection rate to 0.5 mL/s compared with 1 mL/s. The Korean Society of Radiology 2014 2014-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4170161/ /pubmed/25246821 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.5.605 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Gastrointestinal Imaging
Kim, Sung Mo
Heo, Suk Hee
Kim, Jin Woong
Lim, Hyo Soon
Shin, Sang Soo
Jeong, Yong Yeon
Kang, Heoung Keun
Hepatic Arterial Phase on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MR Imaging: A Randomized Comparison of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s Injection Rates
title Hepatic Arterial Phase on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MR Imaging: A Randomized Comparison of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s Injection Rates
title_full Hepatic Arterial Phase on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MR Imaging: A Randomized Comparison of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s Injection Rates
title_fullStr Hepatic Arterial Phase on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MR Imaging: A Randomized Comparison of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s Injection Rates
title_full_unstemmed Hepatic Arterial Phase on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MR Imaging: A Randomized Comparison of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s Injection Rates
title_short Hepatic Arterial Phase on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MR Imaging: A Randomized Comparison of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s Injection Rates
title_sort hepatic arterial phase on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver mr imaging: a randomized comparison of 0.5 ml/s and 1 ml/s injection rates
topic Gastrointestinal Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25246821
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.5.605
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsungmo hepaticarterialphaseongadoxeticacidenhancedlivermrimagingarandomizedcomparisonof05mlsand1mlsinjectionrates
AT heosukhee hepaticarterialphaseongadoxeticacidenhancedlivermrimagingarandomizedcomparisonof05mlsand1mlsinjectionrates
AT kimjinwoong hepaticarterialphaseongadoxeticacidenhancedlivermrimagingarandomizedcomparisonof05mlsand1mlsinjectionrates
AT limhyosoon hepaticarterialphaseongadoxeticacidenhancedlivermrimagingarandomizedcomparisonof05mlsand1mlsinjectionrates
AT shinsangsoo hepaticarterialphaseongadoxeticacidenhancedlivermrimagingarandomizedcomparisonof05mlsand1mlsinjectionrates
AT jeongyongyeon hepaticarterialphaseongadoxeticacidenhancedlivermrimagingarandomizedcomparisonof05mlsand1mlsinjectionrates
AT kangheoungkeun hepaticarterialphaseongadoxeticacidenhancedlivermrimagingarandomizedcomparisonof05mlsand1mlsinjectionrates