Cargando…

Random variation in rectal position during radiotherapy for prostate cancer is two to three times greater than that predicted from prostate motion

OBJECTIVE: Radiotherapy for prostate cancer does not explicitly take into account daily variation in the position of the rectum. It is important to accurately assess accumulated dose (D(A)) to the rectum in order to understand the relationship between dose and toxicity. The primary objective of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scaife, J, Harrison, K, Romanchikova, M, Parker, A, Sutcliffe, M, Bond, S, Thomas, S, Freeman, S, Jena, R, Bates, A, Burnet, N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25138155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140343
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Radiotherapy for prostate cancer does not explicitly take into account daily variation in the position of the rectum. It is important to accurately assess accumulated dose (D(A)) to the rectum in order to understand the relationship between dose and toxicity. The primary objective of this work was to quantify systematic (Σ) and random (σ) variation in the position of the rectum during a course of prostate radiotherapy. METHODS: The rectum was manually outlined on the kilo-voltage planning scan and 37 daily mega-voltage image guidance scans for 10 participants recruited to the VoxTox study. The femoral heads were used to produce a fixed point to which all rectal contours were referenced. RESULTS: Σ [standard deviation (SD) of means] between planning and treatment was 4.2 mm in the anteroposterior (AP) direction and 1.3 mm left–right (LR). σ (root mean square of SDs) was 5.2 mm AP and 2.7 mm LR. Superior–inferior variation was less than one slice above and below the planning position. CONCLUSION: Our results for Σ are in line with published data for prostate motion. σ, however, was approximately twice as great as that seen for prostate motion. This suggests that D(A) may differ from planned dose in some patients treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This work is the first to use daily imaging to quantify Σ and σ of the rectum in prostate cancer. σ was found to be greater than published data, providing strong rationale for further investigation of individual D(A).