Cargando…

Random variation in rectal position during radiotherapy for prostate cancer is two to three times greater than that predicted from prostate motion

OBJECTIVE: Radiotherapy for prostate cancer does not explicitly take into account daily variation in the position of the rectum. It is important to accurately assess accumulated dose (D(A)) to the rectum in order to understand the relationship between dose and toxicity. The primary objective of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scaife, J, Harrison, K, Romanchikova, M, Parker, A, Sutcliffe, M, Bond, S, Thomas, S, Freeman, S, Jena, R, Bates, A, Burnet, N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25138155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140343
_version_ 1782335862108848128
author Scaife, J
Harrison, K
Romanchikova, M
Parker, A
Sutcliffe, M
Bond, S
Thomas, S
Freeman, S
Jena, R
Bates, A
Burnet, N
author_facet Scaife, J
Harrison, K
Romanchikova, M
Parker, A
Sutcliffe, M
Bond, S
Thomas, S
Freeman, S
Jena, R
Bates, A
Burnet, N
author_sort Scaife, J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Radiotherapy for prostate cancer does not explicitly take into account daily variation in the position of the rectum. It is important to accurately assess accumulated dose (D(A)) to the rectum in order to understand the relationship between dose and toxicity. The primary objective of this work was to quantify systematic (Σ) and random (σ) variation in the position of the rectum during a course of prostate radiotherapy. METHODS: The rectum was manually outlined on the kilo-voltage planning scan and 37 daily mega-voltage image guidance scans for 10 participants recruited to the VoxTox study. The femoral heads were used to produce a fixed point to which all rectal contours were referenced. RESULTS: Σ [standard deviation (SD) of means] between planning and treatment was 4.2 mm in the anteroposterior (AP) direction and 1.3 mm left–right (LR). σ (root mean square of SDs) was 5.2 mm AP and 2.7 mm LR. Superior–inferior variation was less than one slice above and below the planning position. CONCLUSION: Our results for Σ are in line with published data for prostate motion. σ, however, was approximately twice as great as that seen for prostate motion. This suggests that D(A) may differ from planned dose in some patients treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This work is the first to use daily imaging to quantify Σ and σ of the rectum in prostate cancer. σ was found to be greater than published data, providing strong rationale for further investigation of individual D(A).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4170867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41708672015-10-01 Random variation in rectal position during radiotherapy for prostate cancer is two to three times greater than that predicted from prostate motion Scaife, J Harrison, K Romanchikova, M Parker, A Sutcliffe, M Bond, S Thomas, S Freeman, S Jena, R Bates, A Burnet, N Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: Radiotherapy for prostate cancer does not explicitly take into account daily variation in the position of the rectum. It is important to accurately assess accumulated dose (D(A)) to the rectum in order to understand the relationship between dose and toxicity. The primary objective of this work was to quantify systematic (Σ) and random (σ) variation in the position of the rectum during a course of prostate radiotherapy. METHODS: The rectum was manually outlined on the kilo-voltage planning scan and 37 daily mega-voltage image guidance scans for 10 participants recruited to the VoxTox study. The femoral heads were used to produce a fixed point to which all rectal contours were referenced. RESULTS: Σ [standard deviation (SD) of means] between planning and treatment was 4.2 mm in the anteroposterior (AP) direction and 1.3 mm left–right (LR). σ (root mean square of SDs) was 5.2 mm AP and 2.7 mm LR. Superior–inferior variation was less than one slice above and below the planning position. CONCLUSION: Our results for Σ are in line with published data for prostate motion. σ, however, was approximately twice as great as that seen for prostate motion. This suggests that D(A) may differ from planned dose in some patients treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This work is the first to use daily imaging to quantify Σ and σ of the rectum in prostate cancer. σ was found to be greater than published data, providing strong rationale for further investigation of individual D(A). The British Institute of Radiology. 2014-10 2014-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4170867/ /pubmed/25138155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140343 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Scaife, J
Harrison, K
Romanchikova, M
Parker, A
Sutcliffe, M
Bond, S
Thomas, S
Freeman, S
Jena, R
Bates, A
Burnet, N
Random variation in rectal position during radiotherapy for prostate cancer is two to three times greater than that predicted from prostate motion
title Random variation in rectal position during radiotherapy for prostate cancer is two to three times greater than that predicted from prostate motion
title_full Random variation in rectal position during radiotherapy for prostate cancer is two to three times greater than that predicted from prostate motion
title_fullStr Random variation in rectal position during radiotherapy for prostate cancer is two to three times greater than that predicted from prostate motion
title_full_unstemmed Random variation in rectal position during radiotherapy for prostate cancer is two to three times greater than that predicted from prostate motion
title_short Random variation in rectal position during radiotherapy for prostate cancer is two to three times greater than that predicted from prostate motion
title_sort random variation in rectal position during radiotherapy for prostate cancer is two to three times greater than that predicted from prostate motion
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25138155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140343
work_keys_str_mv AT scaifej randomvariationinrectalpositionduringradiotherapyforprostatecanceristwotothreetimesgreaterthanthatpredictedfromprostatemotion
AT harrisonk randomvariationinrectalpositionduringradiotherapyforprostatecanceristwotothreetimesgreaterthanthatpredictedfromprostatemotion
AT romanchikovam randomvariationinrectalpositionduringradiotherapyforprostatecanceristwotothreetimesgreaterthanthatpredictedfromprostatemotion
AT parkera randomvariationinrectalpositionduringradiotherapyforprostatecanceristwotothreetimesgreaterthanthatpredictedfromprostatemotion
AT sutcliffem randomvariationinrectalpositionduringradiotherapyforprostatecanceristwotothreetimesgreaterthanthatpredictedfromprostatemotion
AT bonds randomvariationinrectalpositionduringradiotherapyforprostatecanceristwotothreetimesgreaterthanthatpredictedfromprostatemotion
AT thomass randomvariationinrectalpositionduringradiotherapyforprostatecanceristwotothreetimesgreaterthanthatpredictedfromprostatemotion
AT freemans randomvariationinrectalpositionduringradiotherapyforprostatecanceristwotothreetimesgreaterthanthatpredictedfromprostatemotion
AT jenar randomvariationinrectalpositionduringradiotherapyforprostatecanceristwotothreetimesgreaterthanthatpredictedfromprostatemotion
AT batesa randomvariationinrectalpositionduringradiotherapyforprostatecanceristwotothreetimesgreaterthanthatpredictedfromprostatemotion
AT burnetn randomvariationinrectalpositionduringradiotherapyforprostatecanceristwotothreetimesgreaterthanthatpredictedfromprostatemotion