Cargando…
Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis
This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organization, offers a comprehensive map of equity criteria that are relevant to health care priority setting and should be considered in addition to cost-effectiveness analysis. The guidance, in the form o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4171087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25246855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-12-18 |
_version_ | 1782335876383113216 |
---|---|
author | Norheim, Ole F Baltussen, Rob Johri, Mira Chisholm, Dan Nord, Erik Brock, DanW Carlsson, Per Cookson, Richard Daniels, Norman Danis, Marion Fleurbaey, Marc Johansson, Kjell A Kapiriri, Lydia Littlejohns, Peter Mbeeli, Thomas Rao, Krishna D Edejer, Tessa Tan-Torres Wikler, Dan |
author_facet | Norheim, Ole F Baltussen, Rob Johri, Mira Chisholm, Dan Nord, Erik Brock, DanW Carlsson, Per Cookson, Richard Daniels, Norman Danis, Marion Fleurbaey, Marc Johansson, Kjell A Kapiriri, Lydia Littlejohns, Peter Mbeeli, Thomas Rao, Krishna D Edejer, Tessa Tan-Torres Wikler, Dan |
author_sort | Norheim, Ole F |
collection | PubMed |
description | This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organization, offers a comprehensive map of equity criteria that are relevant to health care priority setting and should be considered in addition to cost-effectiveness analysis. The guidance, in the form of a checklist, is especially targeted at decision makers who set priorities at national and sub-national levels, and those who interpret findings from cost-effectiveness analysis. It is also targeted at researchers conducting cost-effectiveness analysis to improve reporting of their results in the light of these other criteria. The guidance was develop through a series of expert consultation meetings and involved three steps: i) methods and normative concepts were identified through a systematic review; ii) the review findings were critically assessed in the expert consultation meetings which resulted in a draft checklist of normative criteria; iii) the checklist was validated though an extensive hearing process with input from a range of relevant stakeholders. The GPS-Health incorporates criteria related to the disease an intervention targets (severity of disease, capacity to benefit, and past health loss); characteristics of social groups an intervention targets (socioeconomic status, area of living, gender; race, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation); and non-health consequences of an intervention (financial protection, economic productivity, and care for others). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4171087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41710872014-09-23 Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis Norheim, Ole F Baltussen, Rob Johri, Mira Chisholm, Dan Nord, Erik Brock, DanW Carlsson, Per Cookson, Richard Daniels, Norman Danis, Marion Fleurbaey, Marc Johansson, Kjell A Kapiriri, Lydia Littlejohns, Peter Mbeeli, Thomas Rao, Krishna D Edejer, Tessa Tan-Torres Wikler, Dan Cost Eff Resour Alloc Methodology This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organization, offers a comprehensive map of equity criteria that are relevant to health care priority setting and should be considered in addition to cost-effectiveness analysis. The guidance, in the form of a checklist, is especially targeted at decision makers who set priorities at national and sub-national levels, and those who interpret findings from cost-effectiveness analysis. It is also targeted at researchers conducting cost-effectiveness analysis to improve reporting of their results in the light of these other criteria. The guidance was develop through a series of expert consultation meetings and involved three steps: i) methods and normative concepts were identified through a systematic review; ii) the review findings were critically assessed in the expert consultation meetings which resulted in a draft checklist of normative criteria; iii) the checklist was validated though an extensive hearing process with input from a range of relevant stakeholders. The GPS-Health incorporates criteria related to the disease an intervention targets (severity of disease, capacity to benefit, and past health loss); characteristics of social groups an intervention targets (socioeconomic status, area of living, gender; race, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation); and non-health consequences of an intervention (financial protection, economic productivity, and care for others). BioMed Central 2014-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4171087/ /pubmed/25246855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-12-18 Text en Copyright © 2014 Norheim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Norheim, Ole F Baltussen, Rob Johri, Mira Chisholm, Dan Nord, Erik Brock, DanW Carlsson, Per Cookson, Richard Daniels, Norman Danis, Marion Fleurbaey, Marc Johansson, Kjell A Kapiriri, Lydia Littlejohns, Peter Mbeeli, Thomas Rao, Krishna D Edejer, Tessa Tan-Torres Wikler, Dan Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis |
title | Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_full | Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_fullStr | Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_short | Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_sort | guidance on priority setting in health care (gps-health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4171087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25246855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-12-18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT norheimolef guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis AT baltussenrob guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis AT johrimira guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis AT chisholmdan guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis AT norderik guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis AT brockdanw guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis AT carlssonper guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis AT cooksonrichard guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis AT danielsnorman guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis AT danismarion guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis AT fleurbaeymarc guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis AT johanssonkjella guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis AT kapiririlydia guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis AT littlejohnspeter guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis AT mbeelithomas guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis AT raokrishnad guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis AT edejertessatantorres guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis AT wiklerdan guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis |