Cargando…

Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis

This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organization, offers a comprehensive map of equity criteria that are relevant to health care priority setting and should be considered in addition to cost-effectiveness analysis. The guidance, in the form o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Norheim, Ole F, Baltussen, Rob, Johri, Mira, Chisholm, Dan, Nord, Erik, Brock, DanW, Carlsson, Per, Cookson, Richard, Daniels, Norman, Danis, Marion, Fleurbaey, Marc, Johansson, Kjell A, Kapiriri, Lydia, Littlejohns, Peter, Mbeeli, Thomas, Rao, Krishna D, Edejer, Tessa Tan-Torres, Wikler, Dan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4171087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25246855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-12-18
_version_ 1782335876383113216
author Norheim, Ole F
Baltussen, Rob
Johri, Mira
Chisholm, Dan
Nord, Erik
Brock, DanW
Carlsson, Per
Cookson, Richard
Daniels, Norman
Danis, Marion
Fleurbaey, Marc
Johansson, Kjell A
Kapiriri, Lydia
Littlejohns, Peter
Mbeeli, Thomas
Rao, Krishna D
Edejer, Tessa Tan-Torres
Wikler, Dan
author_facet Norheim, Ole F
Baltussen, Rob
Johri, Mira
Chisholm, Dan
Nord, Erik
Brock, DanW
Carlsson, Per
Cookson, Richard
Daniels, Norman
Danis, Marion
Fleurbaey, Marc
Johansson, Kjell A
Kapiriri, Lydia
Littlejohns, Peter
Mbeeli, Thomas
Rao, Krishna D
Edejer, Tessa Tan-Torres
Wikler, Dan
author_sort Norheim, Ole F
collection PubMed
description This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organization, offers a comprehensive map of equity criteria that are relevant to health care priority setting and should be considered in addition to cost-effectiveness analysis. The guidance, in the form of a checklist, is especially targeted at decision makers who set priorities at national and sub-national levels, and those who interpret findings from cost-effectiveness analysis. It is also targeted at researchers conducting cost-effectiveness analysis to improve reporting of their results in the light of these other criteria. The guidance was develop through a series of expert consultation meetings and involved three steps: i) methods and normative concepts were identified through a systematic review; ii) the review findings were critically assessed in the expert consultation meetings which resulted in a draft checklist of normative criteria; iii) the checklist was validated though an extensive hearing process with input from a range of relevant stakeholders. The GPS-Health incorporates criteria related to the disease an intervention targets (severity of disease, capacity to benefit, and past health loss); characteristics of social groups an intervention targets (socioeconomic status, area of living, gender; race, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation); and non-health consequences of an intervention (financial protection, economic productivity, and care for others).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4171087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41710872014-09-23 Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis Norheim, Ole F Baltussen, Rob Johri, Mira Chisholm, Dan Nord, Erik Brock, DanW Carlsson, Per Cookson, Richard Daniels, Norman Danis, Marion Fleurbaey, Marc Johansson, Kjell A Kapiriri, Lydia Littlejohns, Peter Mbeeli, Thomas Rao, Krishna D Edejer, Tessa Tan-Torres Wikler, Dan Cost Eff Resour Alloc Methodology This Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organization, offers a comprehensive map of equity criteria that are relevant to health care priority setting and should be considered in addition to cost-effectiveness analysis. The guidance, in the form of a checklist, is especially targeted at decision makers who set priorities at national and sub-national levels, and those who interpret findings from cost-effectiveness analysis. It is also targeted at researchers conducting cost-effectiveness analysis to improve reporting of their results in the light of these other criteria. The guidance was develop through a series of expert consultation meetings and involved three steps: i) methods and normative concepts were identified through a systematic review; ii) the review findings were critically assessed in the expert consultation meetings which resulted in a draft checklist of normative criteria; iii) the checklist was validated though an extensive hearing process with input from a range of relevant stakeholders. The GPS-Health incorporates criteria related to the disease an intervention targets (severity of disease, capacity to benefit, and past health loss); characteristics of social groups an intervention targets (socioeconomic status, area of living, gender; race, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation); and non-health consequences of an intervention (financial protection, economic productivity, and care for others). BioMed Central 2014-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4171087/ /pubmed/25246855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-12-18 Text en Copyright © 2014 Norheim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Norheim, Ole F
Baltussen, Rob
Johri, Mira
Chisholm, Dan
Nord, Erik
Brock, DanW
Carlsson, Per
Cookson, Richard
Daniels, Norman
Danis, Marion
Fleurbaey, Marc
Johansson, Kjell A
Kapiriri, Lydia
Littlejohns, Peter
Mbeeli, Thomas
Rao, Krishna D
Edejer, Tessa Tan-Torres
Wikler, Dan
Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis
title Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis
title_fullStr Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full_unstemmed Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis
title_short Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis
title_sort guidance on priority setting in health care (gps-health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4171087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25246855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-12-18
work_keys_str_mv AT norheimolef guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis
AT baltussenrob guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis
AT johrimira guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis
AT chisholmdan guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis
AT norderik guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis
AT brockdanw guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis
AT carlssonper guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis
AT cooksonrichard guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis
AT danielsnorman guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis
AT danismarion guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis
AT fleurbaeymarc guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis
AT johanssonkjella guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis
AT kapiririlydia guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis
AT littlejohnspeter guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis
AT mbeelithomas guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis
AT raokrishnad guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis
AT edejertessatantorres guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis
AT wiklerdan guidanceonprioritysettinginhealthcaregpshealththeinclusionofequitycriterianotcapturedbycosteffectivenessanalysis