Cargando…
Electrically-Evoked Frequency-Following Response (EFFR) in the Auditory Brainstem of Guinea Pigs
It is still a difficult clinical issue to decide whether a patient is a suitable candidate for a cochlear implant and to plan postoperative rehabilitation, especially for some special cases, such as auditory neuropathy. A partial solution to these problems is to preoperatively evaluate the functiona...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4171095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25244253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106719 |
_version_ | 1782335878273695744 |
---|---|
author | He, Wenxin Ding, Xiuyong Zhang, Ruxiang Chen, Jing Zhang, Daoxing Wu, Xihong |
author_facet | He, Wenxin Ding, Xiuyong Zhang, Ruxiang Chen, Jing Zhang, Daoxing Wu, Xihong |
author_sort | He, Wenxin |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is still a difficult clinical issue to decide whether a patient is a suitable candidate for a cochlear implant and to plan postoperative rehabilitation, especially for some special cases, such as auditory neuropathy. A partial solution to these problems is to preoperatively evaluate the functional integrity of the auditory neural pathways. For evaluating the strength of phase-locking of auditory neurons, which was not reflected in previous methods using electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR), a new method for recording phase-locking related auditory responses to electrical stimulation, called the electrically evoked frequency-following response (EFFR), was developed and evaluated using guinea pigs. The main objective was to assess feasibility of the method by testing whether the recorded signals reflected auditory neural responses or artifacts. The results showed the following: 1) the recorded signals were evoked by neuron responses rather than by artifact; 2) responses evoked by periodic signals were significantly higher than those evoked by the white noise; 3) the latency of the responses fell in the expected range; 4) the responses decreased significantly after death of the guinea pigs; and 5) the responses decreased significantly when the animal was replaced by an electrical resistance. All of these results suggest the method was valid. Recording obtained using complex tones with a missing fundamental component and using pure tones with various frequencies were consistent with those obtained using acoustic stimulation in previous studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4171095 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41710952014-09-25 Electrically-Evoked Frequency-Following Response (EFFR) in the Auditory Brainstem of Guinea Pigs He, Wenxin Ding, Xiuyong Zhang, Ruxiang Chen, Jing Zhang, Daoxing Wu, Xihong PLoS One Research Article It is still a difficult clinical issue to decide whether a patient is a suitable candidate for a cochlear implant and to plan postoperative rehabilitation, especially for some special cases, such as auditory neuropathy. A partial solution to these problems is to preoperatively evaluate the functional integrity of the auditory neural pathways. For evaluating the strength of phase-locking of auditory neurons, which was not reflected in previous methods using electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR), a new method for recording phase-locking related auditory responses to electrical stimulation, called the electrically evoked frequency-following response (EFFR), was developed and evaluated using guinea pigs. The main objective was to assess feasibility of the method by testing whether the recorded signals reflected auditory neural responses or artifacts. The results showed the following: 1) the recorded signals were evoked by neuron responses rather than by artifact; 2) responses evoked by periodic signals were significantly higher than those evoked by the white noise; 3) the latency of the responses fell in the expected range; 4) the responses decreased significantly after death of the guinea pigs; and 5) the responses decreased significantly when the animal was replaced by an electrical resistance. All of these results suggest the method was valid. Recording obtained using complex tones with a missing fundamental component and using pure tones with various frequencies were consistent with those obtained using acoustic stimulation in previous studies. Public Library of Science 2014-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4171095/ /pubmed/25244253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106719 Text en © 2014 He et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article He, Wenxin Ding, Xiuyong Zhang, Ruxiang Chen, Jing Zhang, Daoxing Wu, Xihong Electrically-Evoked Frequency-Following Response (EFFR) in the Auditory Brainstem of Guinea Pigs |
title | Electrically-Evoked Frequency-Following Response (EFFR) in the Auditory Brainstem of Guinea Pigs |
title_full | Electrically-Evoked Frequency-Following Response (EFFR) in the Auditory Brainstem of Guinea Pigs |
title_fullStr | Electrically-Evoked Frequency-Following Response (EFFR) in the Auditory Brainstem of Guinea Pigs |
title_full_unstemmed | Electrically-Evoked Frequency-Following Response (EFFR) in the Auditory Brainstem of Guinea Pigs |
title_short | Electrically-Evoked Frequency-Following Response (EFFR) in the Auditory Brainstem of Guinea Pigs |
title_sort | electrically-evoked frequency-following response (effr) in the auditory brainstem of guinea pigs |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4171095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25244253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106719 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hewenxin electricallyevokedfrequencyfollowingresponseeffrintheauditorybrainstemofguineapigs AT dingxiuyong electricallyevokedfrequencyfollowingresponseeffrintheauditorybrainstemofguineapigs AT zhangruxiang electricallyevokedfrequencyfollowingresponseeffrintheauditorybrainstemofguineapigs AT chenjing electricallyevokedfrequencyfollowingresponseeffrintheauditorybrainstemofguineapigs AT zhangdaoxing electricallyevokedfrequencyfollowingresponseeffrintheauditorybrainstemofguineapigs AT wuxihong electricallyevokedfrequencyfollowingresponseeffrintheauditorybrainstemofguineapigs |