Cargando…

Building workforce capacity for complex care coordination: a function analysis of workflow activity

BACKGROUND: The care coordination workforce includes a range of clinicians who manage care for patients with multiple chronic conditions both within and outside a hospital, in the community, or in a patient’s home. These patients require a multi-skilled approach to support complex care and social su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heslop, Liza, Power, Rebecca, Cranwell, Kathryn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4171555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25216695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-12-52
_version_ 1782335909076664320
author Heslop, Liza
Power, Rebecca
Cranwell, Kathryn
author_facet Heslop, Liza
Power, Rebecca
Cranwell, Kathryn
author_sort Heslop, Liza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The care coordination workforce includes a range of clinicians who manage care for patients with multiple chronic conditions both within and outside a hospital, in the community, or in a patient’s home. These patients require a multi-skilled approach to support complex care and social support needs as they are typically high users of health, community, and social services. In Australia, workforce structures have not kept pace with this new and emerging workforce. The aim of the study was to develop, map, and analyse workforce functions of a care coordination team. METHODS: Workflow modelling informed the development of an activity log that was used to collect workflow data in 2013 from care coordinators located within the care coordination service offered by a Local Health Network in Australia. The activity log comprised a detailed classification of care coordination functions based on two major categories – direct and indirect care. Direct care functions were grouped into eight domains. A descriptive quantitative investigation design was used for data analysis. The data was analysed using univariate descriptive statistics with results presented in tables and a figure. RESULTS: Care coordinators spent more time (70.9%) on direct care than indirect care (29.1%). Domains of direct care that occupied the most time relative to the 38 direct care functions were ‘Assessment’ (14.1%), ‘Documentation’ (13.9%), ‘Travel time’ (6.3%), and ‘Accepting/discussing referral’ (5.7%). ‘Administration’ formed a large component of indirect care functions (14.8%), followed by ‘Travel’ (12.4%). Sub-analyses of direct care by domains revealed that a group of designated ‘core care coordination functions’ contributed to 40.6% of direct care functions. CONCLUSIONS: The modelling of care coordination functions and the descriptions of workflow activity support local development of care coordination capacity and workforce capability through extensive practice redesigns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4171555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41715552014-09-24 Building workforce capacity for complex care coordination: a function analysis of workflow activity Heslop, Liza Power, Rebecca Cranwell, Kathryn Hum Resour Health Research BACKGROUND: The care coordination workforce includes a range of clinicians who manage care for patients with multiple chronic conditions both within and outside a hospital, in the community, or in a patient’s home. These patients require a multi-skilled approach to support complex care and social support needs as they are typically high users of health, community, and social services. In Australia, workforce structures have not kept pace with this new and emerging workforce. The aim of the study was to develop, map, and analyse workforce functions of a care coordination team. METHODS: Workflow modelling informed the development of an activity log that was used to collect workflow data in 2013 from care coordinators located within the care coordination service offered by a Local Health Network in Australia. The activity log comprised a detailed classification of care coordination functions based on two major categories – direct and indirect care. Direct care functions were grouped into eight domains. A descriptive quantitative investigation design was used for data analysis. The data was analysed using univariate descriptive statistics with results presented in tables and a figure. RESULTS: Care coordinators spent more time (70.9%) on direct care than indirect care (29.1%). Domains of direct care that occupied the most time relative to the 38 direct care functions were ‘Assessment’ (14.1%), ‘Documentation’ (13.9%), ‘Travel time’ (6.3%), and ‘Accepting/discussing referral’ (5.7%). ‘Administration’ formed a large component of indirect care functions (14.8%), followed by ‘Travel’ (12.4%). Sub-analyses of direct care by domains revealed that a group of designated ‘core care coordination functions’ contributed to 40.6% of direct care functions. CONCLUSIONS: The modelling of care coordination functions and the descriptions of workflow activity support local development of care coordination capacity and workforce capability through extensive practice redesigns. BioMed Central 2014-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4171555/ /pubmed/25216695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-12-52 Text en © Heslop et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Heslop, Liza
Power, Rebecca
Cranwell, Kathryn
Building workforce capacity for complex care coordination: a function analysis of workflow activity
title Building workforce capacity for complex care coordination: a function analysis of workflow activity
title_full Building workforce capacity for complex care coordination: a function analysis of workflow activity
title_fullStr Building workforce capacity for complex care coordination: a function analysis of workflow activity
title_full_unstemmed Building workforce capacity for complex care coordination: a function analysis of workflow activity
title_short Building workforce capacity for complex care coordination: a function analysis of workflow activity
title_sort building workforce capacity for complex care coordination: a function analysis of workflow activity
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4171555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25216695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-12-52
work_keys_str_mv AT heslopliza buildingworkforcecapacityforcomplexcarecoordinationafunctionanalysisofworkflowactivity
AT powerrebecca buildingworkforcecapacityforcomplexcarecoordinationafunctionanalysisofworkflowactivity
AT cranwellkathryn buildingworkforcecapacityforcomplexcarecoordinationafunctionanalysisofworkflowactivity