Cargando…

Comparison of clinical outcome after a fixed dose versus dosimetry-based radioiodine treatment of Graves’ disease: Results of a randomized controlled trial in Indian population

OBJECTIVE: Two approaches are used to treat Graves’ disease with radioiodine ((131)I)–the fixed dose approach and the other based on dosimetry. A prospective study was performed to compare the results of these two approaches in a randomized patient population, as such study is lacking in the Indian...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaiswal, Abhishek Kumar, Bal, Chandrasekhar, Damle, Nishikant Avinash, Ballal, Sanjana, Goswami, Ravinder, Hari, Smriti, Kumar, Praveen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4171887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25285281
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.139222
_version_ 1782335966477811712
author Jaiswal, Abhishek Kumar
Bal, Chandrasekhar
Damle, Nishikant Avinash
Ballal, Sanjana
Goswami, Ravinder
Hari, Smriti
Kumar, Praveen
author_facet Jaiswal, Abhishek Kumar
Bal, Chandrasekhar
Damle, Nishikant Avinash
Ballal, Sanjana
Goswami, Ravinder
Hari, Smriti
Kumar, Praveen
author_sort Jaiswal, Abhishek Kumar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Two approaches are used to treat Graves’ disease with radioiodine ((131)I)–the fixed dose approach and the other based on dosimetry. A prospective study was performed to compare the results of these two approaches in a randomized patient population, as such study is lacking in the Indian population till date. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with Graves’ disease were randomized into two groups: (1) Fixed dose group and the (2) Calculated dose group, each comprising of 20 patients. All the patients underwent detailed clinical and biochemical evaluation. Thyroid mass was determined by high resolution ultrasound machine with linear transducer of 7-11 MHz. Patients were given 185-370 kBq (5-10 uCi) of (131)I and 24 hr radioiodine uptake (RAIU) was calculated using thyroid uptake probe and thyroid phantom. Fixed dose group patients were administered 185MBq of (131)I. Calculated dose group patients were given (131)I as per the following formula: Calculated dose = [3700 kBq/g × estimated thyroid wt. (g)] ÷ 24 hr RAIU (%). Success of first dose of radioiodine was defined as clinically/biochemically euthyroid/hypothyroid status at the end of 3 months without the need for further therapy. RESULTS: In the fixed dose group, eight patients were hyperthyroid, four were euthyroid, and eight were hypothyroid after the first dose at 3 months. Success rate of first dose was 60%. In calculated dose group, seven patients were hyperthyroid, eight were euthyroid, and five were hypothyroid. Success rate of first dose was 65%. CONCLUSIONS: There is no statistically significant difference between the success rates of the two methods at 3 months. Hence, fixed dose approach may be used for treatment of Graves’ disease as it is simple and convenient for the patient. Longer follow-up with higher number of patients should be done to confirm or contradict our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4171887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41718872014-10-03 Comparison of clinical outcome after a fixed dose versus dosimetry-based radioiodine treatment of Graves’ disease: Results of a randomized controlled trial in Indian population Jaiswal, Abhishek Kumar Bal, Chandrasekhar Damle, Nishikant Avinash Ballal, Sanjana Goswami, Ravinder Hari, Smriti Kumar, Praveen Indian J Endocrinol Metab Original Article OBJECTIVE: Two approaches are used to treat Graves’ disease with radioiodine ((131)I)–the fixed dose approach and the other based on dosimetry. A prospective study was performed to compare the results of these two approaches in a randomized patient population, as such study is lacking in the Indian population till date. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with Graves’ disease were randomized into two groups: (1) Fixed dose group and the (2) Calculated dose group, each comprising of 20 patients. All the patients underwent detailed clinical and biochemical evaluation. Thyroid mass was determined by high resolution ultrasound machine with linear transducer of 7-11 MHz. Patients were given 185-370 kBq (5-10 uCi) of (131)I and 24 hr radioiodine uptake (RAIU) was calculated using thyroid uptake probe and thyroid phantom. Fixed dose group patients were administered 185MBq of (131)I. Calculated dose group patients were given (131)I as per the following formula: Calculated dose = [3700 kBq/g × estimated thyroid wt. (g)] ÷ 24 hr RAIU (%). Success of first dose of radioiodine was defined as clinically/biochemically euthyroid/hypothyroid status at the end of 3 months without the need for further therapy. RESULTS: In the fixed dose group, eight patients were hyperthyroid, four were euthyroid, and eight were hypothyroid after the first dose at 3 months. Success rate of first dose was 60%. In calculated dose group, seven patients were hyperthyroid, eight were euthyroid, and five were hypothyroid. Success rate of first dose was 65%. CONCLUSIONS: There is no statistically significant difference between the success rates of the two methods at 3 months. Hence, fixed dose approach may be used for treatment of Graves’ disease as it is simple and convenient for the patient. Longer follow-up with higher number of patients should be done to confirm or contradict our findings. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4171887/ /pubmed/25285281 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.139222 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jaiswal, Abhishek Kumar
Bal, Chandrasekhar
Damle, Nishikant Avinash
Ballal, Sanjana
Goswami, Ravinder
Hari, Smriti
Kumar, Praveen
Comparison of clinical outcome after a fixed dose versus dosimetry-based radioiodine treatment of Graves’ disease: Results of a randomized controlled trial in Indian population
title Comparison of clinical outcome after a fixed dose versus dosimetry-based radioiodine treatment of Graves’ disease: Results of a randomized controlled trial in Indian population
title_full Comparison of clinical outcome after a fixed dose versus dosimetry-based radioiodine treatment of Graves’ disease: Results of a randomized controlled trial in Indian population
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical outcome after a fixed dose versus dosimetry-based radioiodine treatment of Graves’ disease: Results of a randomized controlled trial in Indian population
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical outcome after a fixed dose versus dosimetry-based radioiodine treatment of Graves’ disease: Results of a randomized controlled trial in Indian population
title_short Comparison of clinical outcome after a fixed dose versus dosimetry-based radioiodine treatment of Graves’ disease: Results of a randomized controlled trial in Indian population
title_sort comparison of clinical outcome after a fixed dose versus dosimetry-based radioiodine treatment of graves’ disease: results of a randomized controlled trial in indian population
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4171887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25285281
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.139222
work_keys_str_mv AT jaiswalabhishekkumar comparisonofclinicaloutcomeafterafixeddoseversusdosimetrybasedradioiodinetreatmentofgravesdiseaseresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinindianpopulation
AT balchandrasekhar comparisonofclinicaloutcomeafterafixeddoseversusdosimetrybasedradioiodinetreatmentofgravesdiseaseresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinindianpopulation
AT damlenishikantavinash comparisonofclinicaloutcomeafterafixeddoseversusdosimetrybasedradioiodinetreatmentofgravesdiseaseresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinindianpopulation
AT ballalsanjana comparisonofclinicaloutcomeafterafixeddoseversusdosimetrybasedradioiodinetreatmentofgravesdiseaseresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinindianpopulation
AT goswamiravinder comparisonofclinicaloutcomeafterafixeddoseversusdosimetrybasedradioiodinetreatmentofgravesdiseaseresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinindianpopulation
AT harismriti comparisonofclinicaloutcomeafterafixeddoseversusdosimetrybasedradioiodinetreatmentofgravesdiseaseresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinindianpopulation
AT kumarpraveen comparisonofclinicaloutcomeafterafixeddoseversusdosimetrybasedradioiodinetreatmentofgravesdiseaseresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialinindianpopulation