Cargando…

DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN Nocardia spp. AND Mycobacterium spp.: CRITICAL ASPECTS FOR BACTERIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS

New methodologies were developed for the identification of Nocardia but the initial diagnosis still requires a fast and accurate method, mainly due to the similarity to Mycobacterium, both clinical and bacteriologically. Growth on Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium, presence of acid-fast bacilli through...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muricy, Edna Cleide Mendes, Lemes, Romilda Aparecida, Bombarda, Sidney, Ferrazoli, Lucilaine, Chimara, Erica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto de Medicina Tropical 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4172110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25229219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652014000500005
_version_ 1782336007363887104
author Muricy, Edna Cleide Mendes
Lemes, Romilda Aparecida
Bombarda, Sidney
Ferrazoli, Lucilaine
Chimara, Erica
author_facet Muricy, Edna Cleide Mendes
Lemes, Romilda Aparecida
Bombarda, Sidney
Ferrazoli, Lucilaine
Chimara, Erica
author_sort Muricy, Edna Cleide Mendes
collection PubMed
description New methodologies were developed for the identification of Nocardia but the initial diagnosis still requires a fast and accurate method, mainly due to the similarity to Mycobacterium, both clinical and bacteriologically. Growth on Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium, presence of acid-fast bacilli through Ziehl-Neelsen staining, and colony morphology can be confusing aspects between Nocardia and Mycobacterium. This study describes the occurrence of Nocardia spp. in a mycobacterial-reference laboratory, observing the main difficulties in differentiating Nocardia spp. from Mycobacterium spp., and correlating isolates with nocardiosis cases. Laboratory records for the period between 2008 and 2012 were analyzed, and the isolates identified as Nocardia sp. or as non-acid-fast filamentous bacilli were selected. Epidemiological and bacteriological data were analyzed as well. Thirty-three isolates identified as Nocardia sp. and 22 as non-acid-fast bacilli were selected for this study, and represented 0.12% of isolates during the study period. The presumptive identification was based on macroscopic and microscopic morphology, resistance to lysozyme and restriction profiles using the PRA-hsp65 method. Nocardia spp. can grow on media for mycobacteria isolation (LJ and BBL MGIT™) and microscopy and colony morphology are very similar to some mycobacteria species. Seventeen patients (54.8%) were reported and treated for tuberculosis, but presented signs and symptoms of nocardiosis. It was concluded that the occurrence of Nocardia sp. during the study period was 0.12%. Isolates with characteristics of filamentous bacilli, forming aerial hyphae, with colonies that may be pigmented, rough and without the BstEII digestion pattern in PRA-hsp65 method are suggestive of Nocardia spp. For a mycobacterial routine laboratory, a flow for the presumptive identification of Nocardia is essential, allowing the use of more accurate techniques for the correct identification, proper treatment and better quality of life for patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4172110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Instituto de Medicina Tropical
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41721102014-10-28 DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN Nocardia spp. AND Mycobacterium spp.: CRITICAL ASPECTS FOR BACTERIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS Muricy, Edna Cleide Mendes Lemes, Romilda Aparecida Bombarda, Sidney Ferrazoli, Lucilaine Chimara, Erica Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo Bacteriology New methodologies were developed for the identification of Nocardia but the initial diagnosis still requires a fast and accurate method, mainly due to the similarity to Mycobacterium, both clinical and bacteriologically. Growth on Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium, presence of acid-fast bacilli through Ziehl-Neelsen staining, and colony morphology can be confusing aspects between Nocardia and Mycobacterium. This study describes the occurrence of Nocardia spp. in a mycobacterial-reference laboratory, observing the main difficulties in differentiating Nocardia spp. from Mycobacterium spp., and correlating isolates with nocardiosis cases. Laboratory records for the period between 2008 and 2012 were analyzed, and the isolates identified as Nocardia sp. or as non-acid-fast filamentous bacilli were selected. Epidemiological and bacteriological data were analyzed as well. Thirty-three isolates identified as Nocardia sp. and 22 as non-acid-fast bacilli were selected for this study, and represented 0.12% of isolates during the study period. The presumptive identification was based on macroscopic and microscopic morphology, resistance to lysozyme and restriction profiles using the PRA-hsp65 method. Nocardia spp. can grow on media for mycobacteria isolation (LJ and BBL MGIT™) and microscopy and colony morphology are very similar to some mycobacteria species. Seventeen patients (54.8%) were reported and treated for tuberculosis, but presented signs and symptoms of nocardiosis. It was concluded that the occurrence of Nocardia sp. during the study period was 0.12%. Isolates with characteristics of filamentous bacilli, forming aerial hyphae, with colonies that may be pigmented, rough and without the BstEII digestion pattern in PRA-hsp65 method are suggestive of Nocardia spp. For a mycobacterial routine laboratory, a flow for the presumptive identification of Nocardia is essential, allowing the use of more accurate techniques for the correct identification, proper treatment and better quality of life for patients. Instituto de Medicina Tropical 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4172110/ /pubmed/25229219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652014000500005 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Bacteriology
Muricy, Edna Cleide Mendes
Lemes, Romilda Aparecida
Bombarda, Sidney
Ferrazoli, Lucilaine
Chimara, Erica
DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN Nocardia spp. AND Mycobacterium spp.: CRITICAL ASPECTS FOR BACTERIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS
title DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN Nocardia spp. AND Mycobacterium spp.: CRITICAL ASPECTS FOR BACTERIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS
title_full DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN Nocardia spp. AND Mycobacterium spp.: CRITICAL ASPECTS FOR BACTERIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS
title_fullStr DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN Nocardia spp. AND Mycobacterium spp.: CRITICAL ASPECTS FOR BACTERIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS
title_full_unstemmed DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN Nocardia spp. AND Mycobacterium spp.: CRITICAL ASPECTS FOR BACTERIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS
title_short DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN Nocardia spp. AND Mycobacterium spp.: CRITICAL ASPECTS FOR BACTERIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS
title_sort differentiation between nocardia spp. and mycobacterium spp.: critical aspects for bacteriological diagnosis
topic Bacteriology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4172110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25229219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652014000500005
work_keys_str_mv AT muricyednacleidemendes differentiationbetweennocardiasppandmycobacteriumsppcriticalaspectsforbacteriologicaldiagnosis
AT lemesromildaaparecida differentiationbetweennocardiasppandmycobacteriumsppcriticalaspectsforbacteriologicaldiagnosis
AT bombardasidney differentiationbetweennocardiasppandmycobacteriumsppcriticalaspectsforbacteriologicaldiagnosis
AT ferrazolilucilaine differentiationbetweennocardiasppandmycobacteriumsppcriticalaspectsforbacteriologicaldiagnosis
AT chimaraerica differentiationbetweennocardiasppandmycobacteriumsppcriticalaspectsforbacteriologicaldiagnosis