Cargando…

Pyrogen detection methods: Comparison of bovine whole blood assay (bWBA) and monocyte activation test (MAT)

BACKGROUND: Pyrogen detection is of utmost importance in pharmaceutical industry, laboratories and health care institutions. As an alternative to the animal-consuming rabbit pyrogen test or Limulus amoebocyte lysate test, the monocyte activation test was introduced as a gold standard method in the E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wunderlich, Christian, Schumacher, Stephan, Kietzmann, Manfred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4172393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25209100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-15-50
_version_ 1782336030733500416
author Wunderlich, Christian
Schumacher, Stephan
Kietzmann, Manfred
author_facet Wunderlich, Christian
Schumacher, Stephan
Kietzmann, Manfred
author_sort Wunderlich, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pyrogen detection is of utmost importance in pharmaceutical industry, laboratories and health care institutions. As an alternative to the animal-consuming rabbit pyrogen test or Limulus amoebocyte lysate test, the monocyte activation test was introduced as a gold standard method in the European Pharmacopoeia. However, the monocyte activation test has not gained wide acceptance in practice. METHODS: We stimulated bovine whole blood with different endotoxin preparations (lipopolysaccharide E.coli 0127:B8 and 0113:H10), as well as the non-endotoxin pyrogens peptidoglycan and lipoteichoic acid. Prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) served as read out. RESULTS: Employing PGE(2) as read out enabled detection limits of 0.04 EU/ml for lipopolysaccharide 0127:B8, 0.25 EU/ml for lipopolysaccharide 0113:H10 and 10 μg/ml of lipoteichoic acid as well as peptidoglycan. To evaluate the bWBA test system as a possible alternative to the MAT we performed a peer-to-peer comparison of the two methods and confirmed similar sensitivities. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the bovine whole blood assay (bWBA) reproducibly enabled sensitive detection of endotoxin and non-endotoxin pyrogens and may thus become a viable alternative for pyrogen testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4172393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41723932014-09-24 Pyrogen detection methods: Comparison of bovine whole blood assay (bWBA) and monocyte activation test (MAT) Wunderlich, Christian Schumacher, Stephan Kietzmann, Manfred BMC Pharmacol Toxicol Research Article BACKGROUND: Pyrogen detection is of utmost importance in pharmaceutical industry, laboratories and health care institutions. As an alternative to the animal-consuming rabbit pyrogen test or Limulus amoebocyte lysate test, the monocyte activation test was introduced as a gold standard method in the European Pharmacopoeia. However, the monocyte activation test has not gained wide acceptance in practice. METHODS: We stimulated bovine whole blood with different endotoxin preparations (lipopolysaccharide E.coli 0127:B8 and 0113:H10), as well as the non-endotoxin pyrogens peptidoglycan and lipoteichoic acid. Prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) served as read out. RESULTS: Employing PGE(2) as read out enabled detection limits of 0.04 EU/ml for lipopolysaccharide 0127:B8, 0.25 EU/ml for lipopolysaccharide 0113:H10 and 10 μg/ml of lipoteichoic acid as well as peptidoglycan. To evaluate the bWBA test system as a possible alternative to the MAT we performed a peer-to-peer comparison of the two methods and confirmed similar sensitivities. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the bovine whole blood assay (bWBA) reproducibly enabled sensitive detection of endotoxin and non-endotoxin pyrogens and may thus become a viable alternative for pyrogen testing. BioMed Central 2014-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4172393/ /pubmed/25209100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-15-50 Text en Copyright © 2014 Wunderlich et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wunderlich, Christian
Schumacher, Stephan
Kietzmann, Manfred
Pyrogen detection methods: Comparison of bovine whole blood assay (bWBA) and monocyte activation test (MAT)
title Pyrogen detection methods: Comparison of bovine whole blood assay (bWBA) and monocyte activation test (MAT)
title_full Pyrogen detection methods: Comparison of bovine whole blood assay (bWBA) and monocyte activation test (MAT)
title_fullStr Pyrogen detection methods: Comparison of bovine whole blood assay (bWBA) and monocyte activation test (MAT)
title_full_unstemmed Pyrogen detection methods: Comparison of bovine whole blood assay (bWBA) and monocyte activation test (MAT)
title_short Pyrogen detection methods: Comparison of bovine whole blood assay (bWBA) and monocyte activation test (MAT)
title_sort pyrogen detection methods: comparison of bovine whole blood assay (bwba) and monocyte activation test (mat)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4172393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25209100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-15-50
work_keys_str_mv AT wunderlichchristian pyrogendetectionmethodscomparisonofbovinewholebloodassaybwbaandmonocyteactivationtestmat
AT schumacherstephan pyrogendetectionmethodscomparisonofbovinewholebloodassaybwbaandmonocyteactivationtestmat
AT kietzmannmanfred pyrogendetectionmethodscomparisonofbovinewholebloodassaybwbaandmonocyteactivationtestmat