Cargando…

The Effectiveness of Disaster Risk Communication: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies

Introduction: A disaster is a serious disruption to the functioning of a community that exceeds its capacity to cope within its own resources. Risk communication in disasters aims to prevent and mitigate harm from disasters, prepare the population before a disaster, disseminate information during di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bradley, Declan T, McFarland, Marie, Clarke, Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4172473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25642365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.349062e0db1048bb9fc3a3fa67d8a4f8
_version_ 1782336038237110272
author Bradley, Declan T
McFarland, Marie
Clarke, Mike
author_facet Bradley, Declan T
McFarland, Marie
Clarke, Mike
author_sort Bradley, Declan T
collection PubMed
description Introduction: A disaster is a serious disruption to the functioning of a community that exceeds its capacity to cope within its own resources. Risk communication in disasters aims to prevent and mitigate harm from disasters, prepare the population before a disaster, disseminate information during disasters and aid subsequent recovery. The aim of this systematic review is to identify, appraise and synthesise the findings of studies of the effects of risk communication interventions during four stages of the disaster cycle. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science and grey literature sources for randomised trials, cluster randomised trials, controlled and uncontrolled before and after studies, interrupted time series studies and qualitative studies of any method of disaster risk communication to at-risk populations. Outcome criteria were disaster-related knowledge and behaviour, and health outcomes. Results: Searches yielded 5,224 unique articles, of which 100 were judged to be potentially relevant. Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, and two additional studies were identified from other searching. The studies evaluated interventions in all four stages of the disaster cycle, included a variety of man-made, natural and infectious disease disasters, and were conducted in many disparate settings. Only one randomised trial and one cluster randomised trial were identified, with less robust designs used in the other studies. Several studies reported improvements in disaster-related knowledge and behaviour. Discussion: We identified and appraised intervention studies of disaster risk communication and present an overview of the contemporary literature. Most studies used non-randomised designs that make interpretation challenging. We do not make specific recommendations for practice but highlight the need for high-quality randomised trials and appropriately-analysed cluster randomised trials in the field of disaster risk communication where these can be conducted within an appropriate research ethics framework.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4172473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41724732015-01-29 The Effectiveness of Disaster Risk Communication: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies Bradley, Declan T McFarland, Marie Clarke, Mike PLoS Curr Research Article Introduction: A disaster is a serious disruption to the functioning of a community that exceeds its capacity to cope within its own resources. Risk communication in disasters aims to prevent and mitigate harm from disasters, prepare the population before a disaster, disseminate information during disasters and aid subsequent recovery. The aim of this systematic review is to identify, appraise and synthesise the findings of studies of the effects of risk communication interventions during four stages of the disaster cycle. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science and grey literature sources for randomised trials, cluster randomised trials, controlled and uncontrolled before and after studies, interrupted time series studies and qualitative studies of any method of disaster risk communication to at-risk populations. Outcome criteria were disaster-related knowledge and behaviour, and health outcomes. Results: Searches yielded 5,224 unique articles, of which 100 were judged to be potentially relevant. Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, and two additional studies were identified from other searching. The studies evaluated interventions in all four stages of the disaster cycle, included a variety of man-made, natural and infectious disease disasters, and were conducted in many disparate settings. Only one randomised trial and one cluster randomised trial were identified, with less robust designs used in the other studies. Several studies reported improvements in disaster-related knowledge and behaviour. Discussion: We identified and appraised intervention studies of disaster risk communication and present an overview of the contemporary literature. Most studies used non-randomised designs that make interpretation challenging. We do not make specific recommendations for practice but highlight the need for high-quality randomised trials and appropriately-analysed cluster randomised trials in the field of disaster risk communication where these can be conducted within an appropriate research ethics framework. Public Library of Science 2014-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4172473/ /pubmed/25642365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.349062e0db1048bb9fc3a3fa67d8a4f8 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bradley, Declan T
McFarland, Marie
Clarke, Mike
The Effectiveness of Disaster Risk Communication: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies
title The Effectiveness of Disaster Risk Communication: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies
title_full The Effectiveness of Disaster Risk Communication: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies
title_fullStr The Effectiveness of Disaster Risk Communication: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness of Disaster Risk Communication: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies
title_short The Effectiveness of Disaster Risk Communication: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies
title_sort effectiveness of disaster risk communication: a systematic review of intervention studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4172473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25642365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.349062e0db1048bb9fc3a3fa67d8a4f8
work_keys_str_mv AT bradleydeclant theeffectivenessofdisasterriskcommunicationasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies
AT mcfarlandmarie theeffectivenessofdisasterriskcommunicationasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies
AT clarkemike theeffectivenessofdisasterriskcommunicationasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies
AT bradleydeclant effectivenessofdisasterriskcommunicationasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies
AT mcfarlandmarie effectivenessofdisasterriskcommunicationasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies
AT clarkemike effectivenessofdisasterriskcommunicationasystematicreviewofinterventionstudies