Cargando…

Validation of a Low Dose Simulation Technique for Computed Tomography Images

PURPOSE: Evaluation of a new software tool for generation of simulated low-dose computed tomography (CT) images from an original higher dose scan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Original CT scan data (100 mAs, 80 mAs, 60 mAs, 40 mAs, 20 mAs, 10 mAs; 100 kV) of a swine were acquired (approved by the regional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muenzel, Daniela, Koehler, Thomas, Brown, Kevin, Žabić, Stanislav, Fingerle, Alexander A., Waldt, Simone, Bendik, Edgar, Zahel, Tina, Schneider, Armin, Dobritz, Martin, Rummeny, Ernst J., Noël, Peter B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4172631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25247422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107843
_version_ 1782336053544222720
author Muenzel, Daniela
Koehler, Thomas
Brown, Kevin
Žabić, Stanislav
Fingerle, Alexander A.
Waldt, Simone
Bendik, Edgar
Zahel, Tina
Schneider, Armin
Dobritz, Martin
Rummeny, Ernst J.
Noël, Peter B.
author_facet Muenzel, Daniela
Koehler, Thomas
Brown, Kevin
Žabić, Stanislav
Fingerle, Alexander A.
Waldt, Simone
Bendik, Edgar
Zahel, Tina
Schneider, Armin
Dobritz, Martin
Rummeny, Ernst J.
Noël, Peter B.
author_sort Muenzel, Daniela
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Evaluation of a new software tool for generation of simulated low-dose computed tomography (CT) images from an original higher dose scan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Original CT scan data (100 mAs, 80 mAs, 60 mAs, 40 mAs, 20 mAs, 10 mAs; 100 kV) of a swine were acquired (approved by the regional governmental commission for animal protection). Simulations of CT acquisition with a lower dose (simulated 10–80 mAs) were calculated using a low-dose simulation algorithm. The simulations were compared to the originals of the same dose level with regard to density values and image noise. Four radiologists assessed the realistic visual appearance of the simulated images. RESULTS: Image characteristics of simulated low dose scans were similar to the originals. Mean overall discrepancy of image noise and CT values was −1.2% (range −9% to 3.2%) and −0.2% (range −8.2% to 3.2%), respectively, p>0.05. Confidence intervals of discrepancies ranged between 0.9–10.2 HU (noise) and 1.9–13.4 HU (CT values), without significant differences (p>0.05). Subjective observer evaluation of image appearance showed no visually detectable difference. CONCLUSION: Simulated low dose images showed excellent agreement with the originals concerning image noise, CT density values, and subjective assessment of the visual appearance of the simulated images. An authentic low-dose simulation opens up opportunity with regard to staff education, protocol optimization and introduction of new techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4172631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41726312014-10-02 Validation of a Low Dose Simulation Technique for Computed Tomography Images Muenzel, Daniela Koehler, Thomas Brown, Kevin Žabić, Stanislav Fingerle, Alexander A. Waldt, Simone Bendik, Edgar Zahel, Tina Schneider, Armin Dobritz, Martin Rummeny, Ernst J. Noël, Peter B. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Evaluation of a new software tool for generation of simulated low-dose computed tomography (CT) images from an original higher dose scan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Original CT scan data (100 mAs, 80 mAs, 60 mAs, 40 mAs, 20 mAs, 10 mAs; 100 kV) of a swine were acquired (approved by the regional governmental commission for animal protection). Simulations of CT acquisition with a lower dose (simulated 10–80 mAs) were calculated using a low-dose simulation algorithm. The simulations were compared to the originals of the same dose level with regard to density values and image noise. Four radiologists assessed the realistic visual appearance of the simulated images. RESULTS: Image characteristics of simulated low dose scans were similar to the originals. Mean overall discrepancy of image noise and CT values was −1.2% (range −9% to 3.2%) and −0.2% (range −8.2% to 3.2%), respectively, p>0.05. Confidence intervals of discrepancies ranged between 0.9–10.2 HU (noise) and 1.9–13.4 HU (CT values), without significant differences (p>0.05). Subjective observer evaluation of image appearance showed no visually detectable difference. CONCLUSION: Simulated low dose images showed excellent agreement with the originals concerning image noise, CT density values, and subjective assessment of the visual appearance of the simulated images. An authentic low-dose simulation opens up opportunity with regard to staff education, protocol optimization and introduction of new techniques. Public Library of Science 2014-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4172631/ /pubmed/25247422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107843 Text en © 2014 Muenzel et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Muenzel, Daniela
Koehler, Thomas
Brown, Kevin
Žabić, Stanislav
Fingerle, Alexander A.
Waldt, Simone
Bendik, Edgar
Zahel, Tina
Schneider, Armin
Dobritz, Martin
Rummeny, Ernst J.
Noël, Peter B.
Validation of a Low Dose Simulation Technique for Computed Tomography Images
title Validation of a Low Dose Simulation Technique for Computed Tomography Images
title_full Validation of a Low Dose Simulation Technique for Computed Tomography Images
title_fullStr Validation of a Low Dose Simulation Technique for Computed Tomography Images
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a Low Dose Simulation Technique for Computed Tomography Images
title_short Validation of a Low Dose Simulation Technique for Computed Tomography Images
title_sort validation of a low dose simulation technique for computed tomography images
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4172631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25247422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107843
work_keys_str_mv AT muenzeldaniela validationofalowdosesimulationtechniqueforcomputedtomographyimages
AT koehlerthomas validationofalowdosesimulationtechniqueforcomputedtomographyimages
AT brownkevin validationofalowdosesimulationtechniqueforcomputedtomographyimages
AT zabicstanislav validationofalowdosesimulationtechniqueforcomputedtomographyimages
AT fingerlealexandera validationofalowdosesimulationtechniqueforcomputedtomographyimages
AT waldtsimone validationofalowdosesimulationtechniqueforcomputedtomographyimages
AT bendikedgar validationofalowdosesimulationtechniqueforcomputedtomographyimages
AT zaheltina validationofalowdosesimulationtechniqueforcomputedtomographyimages
AT schneiderarmin validationofalowdosesimulationtechniqueforcomputedtomographyimages
AT dobritzmartin validationofalowdosesimulationtechniqueforcomputedtomographyimages
AT rummenyernstj validationofalowdosesimulationtechniqueforcomputedtomographyimages
AT noelpeterb validationofalowdosesimulationtechniqueforcomputedtomographyimages