Cargando…

Low tidal volume pressure support versus controlled ventilation in early experimental sepsis in pigs

BACKGROUND: In moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) several studies support the usage of assisted spontaneous breathing modes. Only limited data, however, focus on the application in systemic sepsis and developing lung injury. The present study examines the effects of immediate initia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ziebart, Alexander, Hartmann, Erik K, Thomas, Rainer, Liu, Tanghua, Duenges, Bastian, Schad, Arno, Bodenstein, Marc, Thal, Serge C, David, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4172867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25189285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-014-0101-6
_version_ 1782336088504795136
author Ziebart, Alexander
Hartmann, Erik K
Thomas, Rainer
Liu, Tanghua
Duenges, Bastian
Schad, Arno
Bodenstein, Marc
Thal, Serge C
David, Matthias
author_facet Ziebart, Alexander
Hartmann, Erik K
Thomas, Rainer
Liu, Tanghua
Duenges, Bastian
Schad, Arno
Bodenstein, Marc
Thal, Serge C
David, Matthias
author_sort Ziebart, Alexander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) several studies support the usage of assisted spontaneous breathing modes. Only limited data, however, focus on the application in systemic sepsis and developing lung injury. The present study examines the effects of immediate initiation of pressure support ventilation (PSV) in a model of sepsis-induced ARDS. METHODS: 18 anesthetized pigs received a two-staged continuous lipopolysaccharide infusion to induce lung injury. The animals were randomly assigned to PSV or volume controlled (VCV) lung protective ventilation (tidal volume each 6 ml kg(-1), n = 2x9) over six hours. Gas exchange parameters, hemodynamics, systemic inflammation, and ventilation distribution by multiple inert gas elimination and electrical impedance tomography were assessed. The post mortem analysis included histopathological scoring, wet to dry ratio, and alveolar protein content. RESULTS: Within six hours both groups developed a mild to moderate ARDS with comparable systemic inflammatory response and without signs of improving gas exchange parameters during PSV. The PSV group showed signs of more homogenous ventilation distribution by electrical impedance tomography, but only slightly less hyperinflated lung compartments by multiple inert gas elimination. Post mortem and histopathological assessment yielded no significant intergroup differences. CONCLUSIONS: In a porcine model of sepsis-induced mild ARDS immediate PSV was not superior to VCV. This contrasts with several experimental studies from non-septic mild to moderate ARDS. The present study therefore assumes that not only severity, but also etiology of lung injury considerably influences the response to early initiation of PSV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4172867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41728672014-09-25 Low tidal volume pressure support versus controlled ventilation in early experimental sepsis in pigs Ziebart, Alexander Hartmann, Erik K Thomas, Rainer Liu, Tanghua Duenges, Bastian Schad, Arno Bodenstein, Marc Thal, Serge C David, Matthias Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: In moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) several studies support the usage of assisted spontaneous breathing modes. Only limited data, however, focus on the application in systemic sepsis and developing lung injury. The present study examines the effects of immediate initiation of pressure support ventilation (PSV) in a model of sepsis-induced ARDS. METHODS: 18 anesthetized pigs received a two-staged continuous lipopolysaccharide infusion to induce lung injury. The animals were randomly assigned to PSV or volume controlled (VCV) lung protective ventilation (tidal volume each 6 ml kg(-1), n = 2x9) over six hours. Gas exchange parameters, hemodynamics, systemic inflammation, and ventilation distribution by multiple inert gas elimination and electrical impedance tomography were assessed. The post mortem analysis included histopathological scoring, wet to dry ratio, and alveolar protein content. RESULTS: Within six hours both groups developed a mild to moderate ARDS with comparable systemic inflammatory response and without signs of improving gas exchange parameters during PSV. The PSV group showed signs of more homogenous ventilation distribution by electrical impedance tomography, but only slightly less hyperinflated lung compartments by multiple inert gas elimination. Post mortem and histopathological assessment yielded no significant intergroup differences. CONCLUSIONS: In a porcine model of sepsis-induced mild ARDS immediate PSV was not superior to VCV. This contrasts with several experimental studies from non-septic mild to moderate ARDS. The present study therefore assumes that not only severity, but also etiology of lung injury considerably influences the response to early initiation of PSV. BioMed Central 2014-09-06 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4172867/ /pubmed/25189285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-014-0101-6 Text en © Ziebart et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ziebart, Alexander
Hartmann, Erik K
Thomas, Rainer
Liu, Tanghua
Duenges, Bastian
Schad, Arno
Bodenstein, Marc
Thal, Serge C
David, Matthias
Low tidal volume pressure support versus controlled ventilation in early experimental sepsis in pigs
title Low tidal volume pressure support versus controlled ventilation in early experimental sepsis in pigs
title_full Low tidal volume pressure support versus controlled ventilation in early experimental sepsis in pigs
title_fullStr Low tidal volume pressure support versus controlled ventilation in early experimental sepsis in pigs
title_full_unstemmed Low tidal volume pressure support versus controlled ventilation in early experimental sepsis in pigs
title_short Low tidal volume pressure support versus controlled ventilation in early experimental sepsis in pigs
title_sort low tidal volume pressure support versus controlled ventilation in early experimental sepsis in pigs
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4172867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25189285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-014-0101-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ziebartalexander lowtidalvolumepressuresupportversuscontrolledventilationinearlyexperimentalsepsisinpigs
AT hartmannerikk lowtidalvolumepressuresupportversuscontrolledventilationinearlyexperimentalsepsisinpigs
AT thomasrainer lowtidalvolumepressuresupportversuscontrolledventilationinearlyexperimentalsepsisinpigs
AT liutanghua lowtidalvolumepressuresupportversuscontrolledventilationinearlyexperimentalsepsisinpigs
AT duengesbastian lowtidalvolumepressuresupportversuscontrolledventilationinearlyexperimentalsepsisinpigs
AT schadarno lowtidalvolumepressuresupportversuscontrolledventilationinearlyexperimentalsepsisinpigs
AT bodensteinmarc lowtidalvolumepressuresupportversuscontrolledventilationinearlyexperimentalsepsisinpigs
AT thalsergec lowtidalvolumepressuresupportversuscontrolledventilationinearlyexperimentalsepsisinpigs
AT davidmatthias lowtidalvolumepressuresupportversuscontrolledventilationinearlyexperimentalsepsisinpigs