Cargando…

Preoperative testing in elective surgery: Is it really cost effective?

INTRODUCTION: During preoperative preparation, patients undergo investigations to detect asymptomatic diseases. The probability of finding significant abnormalities on such routine investigations is small, and these investigations unnecessarily increase costs of perioperative care. We evaluated curr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ranasinghe, Priyanga, Perera, Y. Sanja, Senaratne, J. A. D. Supun, Abayadeera, Anuja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885296
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.84177
_version_ 1782336174590787584
author Ranasinghe, Priyanga
Perera, Y. Sanja
Senaratne, J. A. D. Supun
Abayadeera, Anuja
author_facet Ranasinghe, Priyanga
Perera, Y. Sanja
Senaratne, J. A. D. Supun
Abayadeera, Anuja
author_sort Ranasinghe, Priyanga
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: During preoperative preparation, patients undergo investigations to detect asymptomatic diseases. The probability of finding significant abnormalities on such routine investigations is small, and these investigations unnecessarily increase costs of perioperative care. We evaluated current practices, compliance with national guidelines and costs of preoperative investigations at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing elective surgery at the general surgical units of the NHSL from June to August 2010 were included in this study. The National Guidelines on Preoperative Investigations were the standard of assessment. Data on preoperative investigations were collected using an expert-validated pretested interviewer-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Sample size was 2,061 patients. Mean age of the patients was 46.7±15.8 years; males constituted 54.2% of the study population. Majority of the patients were ASA-I (68.5%) and surgical grade II (62.0%). Request for chest X-ray and prothrombin time / international normalized ratio least conformed to the guidelines. Only fasting blood sugar / random blood sugar demonstrated ‘good’ compliance (>70%) to the guidelines. An ‘acceptable’ compliance (50%-70%) was seen for electrocardiogram, blood grouping and full blood count. All other investigations demonstrated ‘poor’ compliance (<50%) with the guidelines. The total excess cost incurred due to non-recommended investigations during the study period of 3 months was Sri Lankan Rupees (LKR.) 1,324,860 to 2,044,210 (per patient LKR. 642.82-991.85). Intern house officers (IHOs) were involved in the planning of preoperative investigations in 2,001 patients (97.1%), followed by medical officeranesthesia / registrar-anesthesia (n=1,625; 78.8%), surgical registrars (n=190; 9.2%), consultant (n=70; 3.4%), senior registrar (n=46; 2.2%) and senior house officers (n=22; 1.1%). Non-recommended investigations were requested mostly by the IHOs and medical officer–anesthesia / registrar-anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Unnecessary preoperative investigations are common at our institution, leading to substantially excessive costs. There is ample opportunity to rationalize practices and reduce expenditure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4173361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41733612014-10-22 Preoperative testing in elective surgery: Is it really cost effective? Ranasinghe, Priyanga Perera, Y. Sanja Senaratne, J. A. D. Supun Abayadeera, Anuja Anesth Essays Res Original Article INTRODUCTION: During preoperative preparation, patients undergo investigations to detect asymptomatic diseases. The probability of finding significant abnormalities on such routine investigations is small, and these investigations unnecessarily increase costs of perioperative care. We evaluated current practices, compliance with national guidelines and costs of preoperative investigations at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing elective surgery at the general surgical units of the NHSL from June to August 2010 were included in this study. The National Guidelines on Preoperative Investigations were the standard of assessment. Data on preoperative investigations were collected using an expert-validated pretested interviewer-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Sample size was 2,061 patients. Mean age of the patients was 46.7±15.8 years; males constituted 54.2% of the study population. Majority of the patients were ASA-I (68.5%) and surgical grade II (62.0%). Request for chest X-ray and prothrombin time / international normalized ratio least conformed to the guidelines. Only fasting blood sugar / random blood sugar demonstrated ‘good’ compliance (>70%) to the guidelines. An ‘acceptable’ compliance (50%-70%) was seen for electrocardiogram, blood grouping and full blood count. All other investigations demonstrated ‘poor’ compliance (<50%) with the guidelines. The total excess cost incurred due to non-recommended investigations during the study period of 3 months was Sri Lankan Rupees (LKR.) 1,324,860 to 2,044,210 (per patient LKR. 642.82-991.85). Intern house officers (IHOs) were involved in the planning of preoperative investigations in 2,001 patients (97.1%), followed by medical officeranesthesia / registrar-anesthesia (n=1,625; 78.8%), surgical registrars (n=190; 9.2%), consultant (n=70; 3.4%), senior registrar (n=46; 2.2%) and senior house officers (n=22; 1.1%). Non-recommended investigations were requested mostly by the IHOs and medical officer–anesthesia / registrar-anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Unnecessary preoperative investigations are common at our institution, leading to substantially excessive costs. There is ample opportunity to rationalize practices and reduce expenditure. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC4173361/ /pubmed/25885296 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.84177 Text en Copyright: © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ranasinghe, Priyanga
Perera, Y. Sanja
Senaratne, J. A. D. Supun
Abayadeera, Anuja
Preoperative testing in elective surgery: Is it really cost effective?
title Preoperative testing in elective surgery: Is it really cost effective?
title_full Preoperative testing in elective surgery: Is it really cost effective?
title_fullStr Preoperative testing in elective surgery: Is it really cost effective?
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative testing in elective surgery: Is it really cost effective?
title_short Preoperative testing in elective surgery: Is it really cost effective?
title_sort preoperative testing in elective surgery: is it really cost effective?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885296
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.84177
work_keys_str_mv AT ranasinghepriyanga preoperativetestinginelectivesurgeryisitreallycosteffective
AT pereraysanja preoperativetestinginelectivesurgeryisitreallycosteffective
AT senaratnejadsupun preoperativetestinginelectivesurgeryisitreallycosteffective
AT abayadeeraanuja preoperativetestinginelectivesurgeryisitreallycosteffective