Cargando…
Airtraq(®) versus Macintosh laryngoscope: A comparative study in tracheal intubation
BACKGROUND: The curved laryngoscope blade described by Macintosh in 1943 remains the most widely used device to facilitate tracheal intubation. The Airtraq(®) (Prodol Meditec S.A, Vizcaya, Spain) is a new, single use, indirect laryngoscope introduced into clinical practice in 2005. It has wan exagge...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885839 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.118971 |
_version_ | 1782336211131564032 |
---|---|
author | Bhandari, Geeta Shahi, K. S. Asad, Mohammad Bhakuni, Rajani |
author_facet | Bhandari, Geeta Shahi, K. S. Asad, Mohammad Bhakuni, Rajani |
author_sort | Bhandari, Geeta |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The curved laryngoscope blade described by Macintosh in 1943 remains the most widely used device to facilitate tracheal intubation. The Airtraq(®) (Prodol Meditec S.A, Vizcaya, Spain) is a new, single use, indirect laryngoscope introduced into clinical practice in 2005. It has wan exaggerated blade curvature with internal arrangement of optical lenses and a mechanism to prevent fogging of the distal lens. A high quality view of the glottis is provided without the need to align the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axis. We evaluated Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes for success rate of tracheal intubation, overall duration of successful intubation, optimization maneuvers, POGO (percentage of glottic opening) score, and ease of intubation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated by computer-generated random table to one of the two groups, comprising 40 patients each, group I (Airtraq) and group II (Macintosh). After induction of general anesthesia, tracheal intubation was attempted with the Airtraq or the Macintosh laryngoscope as per group. Primary end points were overall success rate of tracheal intubation, overall duration of successful tracheal intubation, optimization maneuvers, POGO score and ease of intubation between the two groups. RESULTS: We observed that Airtraq was better than the Macintosh laryngoscope as duration of successful intubation was shorter in Airtraq 18.15 seconds (±2.74) and in the Macintosh laryngoscope it was 32.72 seconds (±8.31) P < 0.001. POGO was also better in the Airtraq group 100% grade 1 versus 67.5% in the Macintosh group, P < 0.001. Ease of intubation was also better in the Airtraq group. It was easy in 97.5% versus 42.5% in the Macintosh group, P < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Both Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes are equally effective in tracheal intubation in normal airways. Duration of successful tracheal intubation was shorter in the Airtraq group which was statistically significant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4173514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41735142014-10-22 Airtraq(®) versus Macintosh laryngoscope: A comparative study in tracheal intubation Bhandari, Geeta Shahi, K. S. Asad, Mohammad Bhakuni, Rajani Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The curved laryngoscope blade described by Macintosh in 1943 remains the most widely used device to facilitate tracheal intubation. The Airtraq(®) (Prodol Meditec S.A, Vizcaya, Spain) is a new, single use, indirect laryngoscope introduced into clinical practice in 2005. It has wan exaggerated blade curvature with internal arrangement of optical lenses and a mechanism to prevent fogging of the distal lens. A high quality view of the glottis is provided without the need to align the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axis. We evaluated Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes for success rate of tracheal intubation, overall duration of successful intubation, optimization maneuvers, POGO (percentage of glottic opening) score, and ease of intubation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated by computer-generated random table to one of the two groups, comprising 40 patients each, group I (Airtraq) and group II (Macintosh). After induction of general anesthesia, tracheal intubation was attempted with the Airtraq or the Macintosh laryngoscope as per group. Primary end points were overall success rate of tracheal intubation, overall duration of successful tracheal intubation, optimization maneuvers, POGO score and ease of intubation between the two groups. RESULTS: We observed that Airtraq was better than the Macintosh laryngoscope as duration of successful intubation was shorter in Airtraq 18.15 seconds (±2.74) and in the Macintosh laryngoscope it was 32.72 seconds (±8.31) P < 0.001. POGO was also better in the Airtraq group 100% grade 1 versus 67.5% in the Macintosh group, P < 0.001. Ease of intubation was also better in the Airtraq group. It was easy in 97.5% versus 42.5% in the Macintosh group, P < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Both Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes are equally effective in tracheal intubation in normal airways. Duration of successful tracheal intubation was shorter in the Airtraq group which was statistically significant. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC4173514/ /pubmed/25885839 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.118971 Text en Copyright: © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bhandari, Geeta Shahi, K. S. Asad, Mohammad Bhakuni, Rajani Airtraq(®) versus Macintosh laryngoscope: A comparative study in tracheal intubation |
title | Airtraq(®) versus Macintosh laryngoscope: A comparative study in tracheal intubation |
title_full | Airtraq(®) versus Macintosh laryngoscope: A comparative study in tracheal intubation |
title_fullStr | Airtraq(®) versus Macintosh laryngoscope: A comparative study in tracheal intubation |
title_full_unstemmed | Airtraq(®) versus Macintosh laryngoscope: A comparative study in tracheal intubation |
title_short | Airtraq(®) versus Macintosh laryngoscope: A comparative study in tracheal intubation |
title_sort | airtraq(®) versus macintosh laryngoscope: a comparative study in tracheal intubation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885839 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.118971 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhandarigeeta airtraqversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeacomparativestudyintrachealintubation AT shahiks airtraqversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeacomparativestudyintrachealintubation AT asadmohammad airtraqversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeacomparativestudyintrachealintubation AT bhakunirajani airtraqversusmacintoshlaryngoscopeacomparativestudyintrachealintubation |