Cargando…

Does an alcolmeter in the hands of an anesthesiologist make TURP safer? - Results from a case-control study

BACKGROUND: This hospital-based, prospective, case-controlled study was carried out to monitor fluid absorption during transurethral resection of the prostrate (TURP) by marking the irrigating fluid with ethanol for signs of TURP syndrome. Addition of ethanol allows early detection and prevention of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: George, Christina, Kaur, Baljinder, Haque, Parvez D., Mammen, Kim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885834
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.118961
_version_ 1782336211827818496
author George, Christina
Kaur, Baljinder
Haque, Parvez D.
Mammen, Kim
author_facet George, Christina
Kaur, Baljinder
Haque, Parvez D.
Mammen, Kim
author_sort George, Christina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This hospital-based, prospective, case-controlled study was carried out to monitor fluid absorption during transurethral resection of the prostrate (TURP) by marking the irrigating fluid with ethanol for signs of TURP syndrome. Addition of ethanol allows early detection and prevention of full blown TURP syndrome as also the volume of fluid absorbed can be measured. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups of 50 each, taking males undergoing TURP belonging to ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I and II. Group 1 received irrigation with 1.5% glycine alone and group 2 received irrigation with 1.5% glycine along with ethanol during TURP. The primary outcome measure was the detection of TURP syndrome using end expiratory ethanol levels and comparing with serum electrolytes and clinical manifestations. The secondary outcome measures, the hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate, systolic and diastolic pressures, and oxygen saturation were recorded during the intraoperative period after spinal anesthesia and then postoperatively till the end of the first hour in the recovery room. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Chi-square test, Student's t-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient ‘r’. RESULTS: Mean resection time in the ethanol positive patients (36.36 min) was significantly higher than that in the ethanol negative patients (22.08 min) (P < 0.01). The estimated fluid absorbed was statistically significant in 45 minutes of resection in three patients with positive ethanol readings (P < 0.05). Resection was temporally stopped in 16 patients (32%) and permanently in 1 patient (2%), whose resection time reached 60 min. A positive correlation was found between total fall in serum sodium and maximum expiratory ethanol concentration. There was a significant difference in the heart rate between the two groups in the 40(th) minute (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ethanol is a noninvasive, easy-to-use marker in irrigating fluid for assessing fluid absorption. It forewarns to take corrective measures earlier than both fall in sodium and manifestations of TURP syndrome, allowing successful completion of TURP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4173517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41735172014-10-22 Does an alcolmeter in the hands of an anesthesiologist make TURP safer? - Results from a case-control study George, Christina Kaur, Baljinder Haque, Parvez D. Mammen, Kim Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: This hospital-based, prospective, case-controlled study was carried out to monitor fluid absorption during transurethral resection of the prostrate (TURP) by marking the irrigating fluid with ethanol for signs of TURP syndrome. Addition of ethanol allows early detection and prevention of full blown TURP syndrome as also the volume of fluid absorbed can be measured. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups of 50 each, taking males undergoing TURP belonging to ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I and II. Group 1 received irrigation with 1.5% glycine alone and group 2 received irrigation with 1.5% glycine along with ethanol during TURP. The primary outcome measure was the detection of TURP syndrome using end expiratory ethanol levels and comparing with serum electrolytes and clinical manifestations. The secondary outcome measures, the hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate, systolic and diastolic pressures, and oxygen saturation were recorded during the intraoperative period after spinal anesthesia and then postoperatively till the end of the first hour in the recovery room. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Chi-square test, Student's t-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient ‘r’. RESULTS: Mean resection time in the ethanol positive patients (36.36 min) was significantly higher than that in the ethanol negative patients (22.08 min) (P < 0.01). The estimated fluid absorbed was statistically significant in 45 minutes of resection in three patients with positive ethanol readings (P < 0.05). Resection was temporally stopped in 16 patients (32%) and permanently in 1 patient (2%), whose resection time reached 60 min. A positive correlation was found between total fall in serum sodium and maximum expiratory ethanol concentration. There was a significant difference in the heart rate between the two groups in the 40(th) minute (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ethanol is a noninvasive, easy-to-use marker in irrigating fluid for assessing fluid absorption. It forewarns to take corrective measures earlier than both fall in sodium and manifestations of TURP syndrome, allowing successful completion of TURP. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC4173517/ /pubmed/25885834 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.118961 Text en Copyright: © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
George, Christina
Kaur, Baljinder
Haque, Parvez D.
Mammen, Kim
Does an alcolmeter in the hands of an anesthesiologist make TURP safer? - Results from a case-control study
title Does an alcolmeter in the hands of an anesthesiologist make TURP safer? - Results from a case-control study
title_full Does an alcolmeter in the hands of an anesthesiologist make TURP safer? - Results from a case-control study
title_fullStr Does an alcolmeter in the hands of an anesthesiologist make TURP safer? - Results from a case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Does an alcolmeter in the hands of an anesthesiologist make TURP safer? - Results from a case-control study
title_short Does an alcolmeter in the hands of an anesthesiologist make TURP safer? - Results from a case-control study
title_sort does an alcolmeter in the hands of an anesthesiologist make turp safer? - results from a case-control study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885834
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.118961
work_keys_str_mv AT georgechristina doesanalcolmeterinthehandsofananesthesiologistmaketurpsaferresultsfromacasecontrolstudy
AT kaurbaljinder doesanalcolmeterinthehandsofananesthesiologistmaketurpsaferresultsfromacasecontrolstudy
AT haqueparvezd doesanalcolmeterinthehandsofananesthesiologistmaketurpsaferresultsfromacasecontrolstudy
AT mammenkim doesanalcolmeterinthehandsofananesthesiologistmaketurpsaferresultsfromacasecontrolstudy