Cargando…

A comparative study of four combinations of anesthetic drugs for assessing the intraocular pressure changes during gynaecological laparoscopic procedures

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic surgery is the choice for gynaecological surgery these days, but pneumoperitoneum (PNO) and trendelenburg position increase the intraocular pressure (IOP) leading to decrease in perfusion of retina and at times the significant risk of ischemic retinopathy. Our prese...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agrawal, Malti, Dureja, Vijay, Verma, Ananda Prakash, Kang, Lakhwinder Singh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885976
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.123221
_version_ 1782336217259442176
author Agrawal, Malti
Dureja, Vijay
Verma, Ananda Prakash
Kang, Lakhwinder Singh
author_facet Agrawal, Malti
Dureja, Vijay
Verma, Ananda Prakash
Kang, Lakhwinder Singh
author_sort Agrawal, Malti
collection PubMed
description AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic surgery is the choice for gynaecological surgery these days, but pneumoperitoneum (PNO) and trendelenburg position increase the intraocular pressure (IOP) leading to decrease in perfusion of retina and at times the significant risk of ischemic retinopathy. Our present aim is to find out the suitable combination of induction and maintenance agent for combating the increase in IOP by PNO, lithotomy and trendelenburg position, and to study the changes in IOP at different time points and positions in gynaecological laparoscopic procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After taking permission from the Ethical Committee 120 female patients of ASA grade 1 and II were divided arbitrarily in four groups each comprising 30 patients. In group A and B induction was done with propofol 2.5 mg/kg given IV and in group C and D induction was done with thiopentone 5 mg/kg given IV. Atracurium 0.5 mg/kg IV was used as neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA).Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was inserted in all the cases and patients were ventilated with Bain's circuit. Maintenance of anesthesia was done with total intra venous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and100% oxygen in group A and C. In group B and D maintenance was done with 1% isoflurane with oxygen (O(2)) and nitrous oxide (N(2)O) in the ratio of 40:60. Changes in IOP, heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean blood pressure (MBP) were measured. Baseline readings were taken initially and then 2 min after premedication, 1 min after LMA insertion, 1 min after PNO with lithotomy position, 5 min after 20° head down tilt and PNO in situ and 2 min after exsufflation of PNO with supine horizontal position. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: To mitigate increase in IOP during gynaecological laparoscopic surgeries, propofol, and propofol TIVA (Group A) proved to be the best option. Propofol and isoflurane (Group B) thiopentone and propofol TIVA (Group C) were not as effective as group A. However, induction with thiopentone and maintenance with isoflurane (Group D) were not effective at all.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4173539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41735392014-10-22 A comparative study of four combinations of anesthetic drugs for assessing the intraocular pressure changes during gynaecological laparoscopic procedures Agrawal, Malti Dureja, Vijay Verma, Ananda Prakash Kang, Lakhwinder Singh Anesth Essays Res Original Article AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic surgery is the choice for gynaecological surgery these days, but pneumoperitoneum (PNO) and trendelenburg position increase the intraocular pressure (IOP) leading to decrease in perfusion of retina and at times the significant risk of ischemic retinopathy. Our present aim is to find out the suitable combination of induction and maintenance agent for combating the increase in IOP by PNO, lithotomy and trendelenburg position, and to study the changes in IOP at different time points and positions in gynaecological laparoscopic procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After taking permission from the Ethical Committee 120 female patients of ASA grade 1 and II were divided arbitrarily in four groups each comprising 30 patients. In group A and B induction was done with propofol 2.5 mg/kg given IV and in group C and D induction was done with thiopentone 5 mg/kg given IV. Atracurium 0.5 mg/kg IV was used as neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA).Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was inserted in all the cases and patients were ventilated with Bain's circuit. Maintenance of anesthesia was done with total intra venous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and100% oxygen in group A and C. In group B and D maintenance was done with 1% isoflurane with oxygen (O(2)) and nitrous oxide (N(2)O) in the ratio of 40:60. Changes in IOP, heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean blood pressure (MBP) were measured. Baseline readings were taken initially and then 2 min after premedication, 1 min after LMA insertion, 1 min after PNO with lithotomy position, 5 min after 20° head down tilt and PNO in situ and 2 min after exsufflation of PNO with supine horizontal position. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: To mitigate increase in IOP during gynaecological laparoscopic surgeries, propofol, and propofol TIVA (Group A) proved to be the best option. Propofol and isoflurane (Group B) thiopentone and propofol TIVA (Group C) were not as effective as group A. However, induction with thiopentone and maintenance with isoflurane (Group D) were not effective at all. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC4173539/ /pubmed/25885976 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.123221 Text en Copyright: © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Agrawal, Malti
Dureja, Vijay
Verma, Ananda Prakash
Kang, Lakhwinder Singh
A comparative study of four combinations of anesthetic drugs for assessing the intraocular pressure changes during gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
title A comparative study of four combinations of anesthetic drugs for assessing the intraocular pressure changes during gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
title_full A comparative study of four combinations of anesthetic drugs for assessing the intraocular pressure changes during gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
title_fullStr A comparative study of four combinations of anesthetic drugs for assessing the intraocular pressure changes during gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of four combinations of anesthetic drugs for assessing the intraocular pressure changes during gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
title_short A comparative study of four combinations of anesthetic drugs for assessing the intraocular pressure changes during gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
title_sort comparative study of four combinations of anesthetic drugs for assessing the intraocular pressure changes during gynaecological laparoscopic procedures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885976
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.123221
work_keys_str_mv AT agrawalmalti acomparativestudyoffourcombinationsofanestheticdrugsforassessingtheintraocularpressurechangesduringgynaecologicallaparoscopicprocedures
AT durejavijay acomparativestudyoffourcombinationsofanestheticdrugsforassessingtheintraocularpressurechangesduringgynaecologicallaparoscopicprocedures
AT vermaanandaprakash acomparativestudyoffourcombinationsofanestheticdrugsforassessingtheintraocularpressurechangesduringgynaecologicallaparoscopicprocedures
AT kanglakhwindersingh acomparativestudyoffourcombinationsofanestheticdrugsforassessingtheintraocularpressurechangesduringgynaecologicallaparoscopicprocedures
AT agrawalmalti comparativestudyoffourcombinationsofanestheticdrugsforassessingtheintraocularpressurechangesduringgynaecologicallaparoscopicprocedures
AT durejavijay comparativestudyoffourcombinationsofanestheticdrugsforassessingtheintraocularpressurechangesduringgynaecologicallaparoscopicprocedures
AT vermaanandaprakash comparativestudyoffourcombinationsofanestheticdrugsforassessingtheintraocularpressurechangesduringgynaecologicallaparoscopicprocedures
AT kanglakhwindersingh comparativestudyoffourcombinationsofanestheticdrugsforassessingtheintraocularpressurechangesduringgynaecologicallaparoscopicprocedures