Cargando…

Effect of wound infiltration with bupivacaine or lower dose bupivacaine/magnesium versus placebo for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section

AIM: The authors examined the analgesic effect of wound infiltration with bupivacaine or lower dose bupivacaine and magnesium versus normal saline for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eldaba, Ahmad A., Amr, Yasser M., Sobhy, Reda A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885979
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.123227
_version_ 1782336217491177472
author Eldaba, Ahmad A.
Amr, Yasser M.
Sobhy, Reda A.
author_facet Eldaba, Ahmad A.
Amr, Yasser M.
Sobhy, Reda A.
author_sort Eldaba, Ahmad A.
collection PubMed
description AIM: The authors examined the analgesic effect of wound infiltration with bupivacaine or lower dose bupivacaine and magnesium versus normal saline for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II were prepared for elective cesarean section. At the end of the surgery, the wound was continuously infiltrated at a rate of 5 ml/h for 24 h post-operatively by one of the following solutions: 0.25% bupivacaine, a mixture of 0.125% bupivacaine and 5% magnesium sulphate or normal saline (0.9%). Total opioid consumption, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at rest and movement, incidence of opioid side-effects and signs of wound inflammation were assessed during the period of the study (24 h post-operatively). Three months later, residual pain, surgical wound infection, need for extra-antibiotic therapy and wound healing impairment were assessed. RESULTS: Post-operative pain scores at rest were statistically significant higher in the control group than those in the both wound infiltration groups from 4(th) h and onwards (P < 0.0001). Meanwhile, post-operative pain was higher in bupivacaine group versus magnesium group (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, 0.0012, respectively). There was statistically significant increase in VAS during movement in the control group versus others at 2, 4, 12, 24 h post-operatively (P < 0.0001). However, patients received magnesium plus bupivacaine wound infiltration showed a significant decrease in post-operative pain scores than whom received bupivacaine from 4(th) h and onward (P < 0.0001, 0.0054, 0.0001, respectively). Morphine consumption was significantly reduced in the magnesium group, (P < 0.0001). Incidence of residual pain was comparable in the three groups. The incidence of sedation and urine retention were noted to be significantly higher in the control group in comparison to other groups, (P <0.0001). The incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting was reduced in patients received magnesium plus bupivacaine block versus others (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Continuous wound infiltration with a mixture of bupivacaine and magnesium sulphate after cesarean section showed an effective analgesia and reduced post-operative Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) requirements as compared to continuous wound infiltration with local anesthetic only or placebo with fewer incidences of opioid adverse effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4173540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41735402014-10-22 Effect of wound infiltration with bupivacaine or lower dose bupivacaine/magnesium versus placebo for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section Eldaba, Ahmad A. Amr, Yasser M. Sobhy, Reda A. Anesth Essays Res Original Article AIM: The authors examined the analgesic effect of wound infiltration with bupivacaine or lower dose bupivacaine and magnesium versus normal saline for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II were prepared for elective cesarean section. At the end of the surgery, the wound was continuously infiltrated at a rate of 5 ml/h for 24 h post-operatively by one of the following solutions: 0.25% bupivacaine, a mixture of 0.125% bupivacaine and 5% magnesium sulphate or normal saline (0.9%). Total opioid consumption, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at rest and movement, incidence of opioid side-effects and signs of wound inflammation were assessed during the period of the study (24 h post-operatively). Three months later, residual pain, surgical wound infection, need for extra-antibiotic therapy and wound healing impairment were assessed. RESULTS: Post-operative pain scores at rest were statistically significant higher in the control group than those in the both wound infiltration groups from 4(th) h and onwards (P < 0.0001). Meanwhile, post-operative pain was higher in bupivacaine group versus magnesium group (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, 0.0012, respectively). There was statistically significant increase in VAS during movement in the control group versus others at 2, 4, 12, 24 h post-operatively (P < 0.0001). However, patients received magnesium plus bupivacaine wound infiltration showed a significant decrease in post-operative pain scores than whom received bupivacaine from 4(th) h and onward (P < 0.0001, 0.0054, 0.0001, respectively). Morphine consumption was significantly reduced in the magnesium group, (P < 0.0001). Incidence of residual pain was comparable in the three groups. The incidence of sedation and urine retention were noted to be significantly higher in the control group in comparison to other groups, (P <0.0001). The incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting was reduced in patients received magnesium plus bupivacaine block versus others (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Continuous wound infiltration with a mixture of bupivacaine and magnesium sulphate after cesarean section showed an effective analgesia and reduced post-operative Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) requirements as compared to continuous wound infiltration with local anesthetic only or placebo with fewer incidences of opioid adverse effects. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC4173540/ /pubmed/25885979 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.123227 Text en Copyright: © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Eldaba, Ahmad A.
Amr, Yasser M.
Sobhy, Reda A.
Effect of wound infiltration with bupivacaine or lower dose bupivacaine/magnesium versus placebo for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section
title Effect of wound infiltration with bupivacaine or lower dose bupivacaine/magnesium versus placebo for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section
title_full Effect of wound infiltration with bupivacaine or lower dose bupivacaine/magnesium versus placebo for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section
title_fullStr Effect of wound infiltration with bupivacaine or lower dose bupivacaine/magnesium versus placebo for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section
title_full_unstemmed Effect of wound infiltration with bupivacaine or lower dose bupivacaine/magnesium versus placebo for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section
title_short Effect of wound infiltration with bupivacaine or lower dose bupivacaine/magnesium versus placebo for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section
title_sort effect of wound infiltration with bupivacaine or lower dose bupivacaine/magnesium versus placebo for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885979
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.123227
work_keys_str_mv AT eldabaahmada effectofwoundinfiltrationwithbupivacaineorlowerdosebupivacainemagnesiumversusplaceboforpostoperativeanalgesiaaftercesareansection
AT amryasserm effectofwoundinfiltrationwithbupivacaineorlowerdosebupivacainemagnesiumversusplaceboforpostoperativeanalgesiaaftercesareansection
AT sobhyredaa effectofwoundinfiltrationwithbupivacaineorlowerdosebupivacainemagnesiumversusplaceboforpostoperativeanalgesiaaftercesareansection