Cargando…

A comparison of effects of oral premedication with clonidine and metoprolol on intraoperative hemodynamics and surgical conditions during functional endoscopic sinus surgery

CONTEXT: Establishing a near perfect surgical field during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is essential and even a minor bleeding can severely compromise an already restricted view. So, if controlled hypotension can be provided without compromising the safety of patient by a relatively ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puthenveettil, Nitu, Rajan, Sunil, Kumar, Lakshmi, Nair, Suresh Gangadharan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885986
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.123244
_version_ 1782336223590744064
author Puthenveettil, Nitu
Rajan, Sunil
Kumar, Lakshmi
Nair, Suresh Gangadharan
author_facet Puthenveettil, Nitu
Rajan, Sunil
Kumar, Lakshmi
Nair, Suresh Gangadharan
author_sort Puthenveettil, Nitu
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Establishing a near perfect surgical field during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is essential and even a minor bleeding can severely compromise an already restricted view. So, if controlled hypotension can be provided without compromising the safety of patient by a relatively effortless method, surgical field can be improved greatly. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the hemodynamic changes and surgical conditions during FESS following oral premedication with clonidine and metoprolol. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A total of 40 patients undergoing FESS were included in this prospective, randomized controlled study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients were divided into two equal groups. Group A patients were premedicated with oral clonidine 300 mcg and Group B with oral metoprolol 50 mg, 2 h before surgery. All patients received fentanyl 2 mcg/kg and induced with propofol 2 mg/kg. Intubation was done following vecuronium 1 mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained with 66% N(2)O, 33% O(2) and 1% isoflurane. The heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were measured before induction and thereafter every 15 min up to 2 h. The surgeons were asked to estimate the quality of the operative field using a pre-defined category scale with scores 1-5. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Difference within the groups was analyzed using analysis of variance and post-hoc test was used to test the difference between individual groups. Chi-square test was used to find out the association between categorical variables. RESULTS: Comparison of category scale revealed a lower score in Group A up to 60 min. Group B patients showed a statistically lower HR from pre-induction up to 90 min while systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP) and mean arterial pressure did not show a significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Oral premedication with 300 mcg of clonidine produced a better operative field than oral metoprolol 50 mg during FESS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4173566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41735662014-10-22 A comparison of effects of oral premedication with clonidine and metoprolol on intraoperative hemodynamics and surgical conditions during functional endoscopic sinus surgery Puthenveettil, Nitu Rajan, Sunil Kumar, Lakshmi Nair, Suresh Gangadharan Anesth Essays Res Original Article CONTEXT: Establishing a near perfect surgical field during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is essential and even a minor bleeding can severely compromise an already restricted view. So, if controlled hypotension can be provided without compromising the safety of patient by a relatively effortless method, surgical field can be improved greatly. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the hemodynamic changes and surgical conditions during FESS following oral premedication with clonidine and metoprolol. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A total of 40 patients undergoing FESS were included in this prospective, randomized controlled study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients were divided into two equal groups. Group A patients were premedicated with oral clonidine 300 mcg and Group B with oral metoprolol 50 mg, 2 h before surgery. All patients received fentanyl 2 mcg/kg and induced with propofol 2 mg/kg. Intubation was done following vecuronium 1 mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained with 66% N(2)O, 33% O(2) and 1% isoflurane. The heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were measured before induction and thereafter every 15 min up to 2 h. The surgeons were asked to estimate the quality of the operative field using a pre-defined category scale with scores 1-5. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Difference within the groups was analyzed using analysis of variance and post-hoc test was used to test the difference between individual groups. Chi-square test was used to find out the association between categorical variables. RESULTS: Comparison of category scale revealed a lower score in Group A up to 60 min. Group B patients showed a statistically lower HR from pre-induction up to 90 min while systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP) and mean arterial pressure did not show a significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Oral premedication with 300 mcg of clonidine produced a better operative field than oral metoprolol 50 mg during FESS. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC4173566/ /pubmed/25885986 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.123244 Text en Copyright: © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Puthenveettil, Nitu
Rajan, Sunil
Kumar, Lakshmi
Nair, Suresh Gangadharan
A comparison of effects of oral premedication with clonidine and metoprolol on intraoperative hemodynamics and surgical conditions during functional endoscopic sinus surgery
title A comparison of effects of oral premedication with clonidine and metoprolol on intraoperative hemodynamics and surgical conditions during functional endoscopic sinus surgery
title_full A comparison of effects of oral premedication with clonidine and metoprolol on intraoperative hemodynamics and surgical conditions during functional endoscopic sinus surgery
title_fullStr A comparison of effects of oral premedication with clonidine and metoprolol on intraoperative hemodynamics and surgical conditions during functional endoscopic sinus surgery
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of effects of oral premedication with clonidine and metoprolol on intraoperative hemodynamics and surgical conditions during functional endoscopic sinus surgery
title_short A comparison of effects of oral premedication with clonidine and metoprolol on intraoperative hemodynamics and surgical conditions during functional endoscopic sinus surgery
title_sort comparison of effects of oral premedication with clonidine and metoprolol on intraoperative hemodynamics and surgical conditions during functional endoscopic sinus surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885986
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.123244
work_keys_str_mv AT puthenveettilnitu acomparisonofeffectsoforalpremedicationwithclonidineandmetoprololonintraoperativehemodynamicsandsurgicalconditionsduringfunctionalendoscopicsinussurgery
AT rajansunil acomparisonofeffectsoforalpremedicationwithclonidineandmetoprololonintraoperativehemodynamicsandsurgicalconditionsduringfunctionalendoscopicsinussurgery
AT kumarlakshmi acomparisonofeffectsoforalpremedicationwithclonidineandmetoprololonintraoperativehemodynamicsandsurgicalconditionsduringfunctionalendoscopicsinussurgery
AT nairsureshgangadharan acomparisonofeffectsoforalpremedicationwithclonidineandmetoprololonintraoperativehemodynamicsandsurgicalconditionsduringfunctionalendoscopicsinussurgery
AT puthenveettilnitu comparisonofeffectsoforalpremedicationwithclonidineandmetoprololonintraoperativehemodynamicsandsurgicalconditionsduringfunctionalendoscopicsinussurgery
AT rajansunil comparisonofeffectsoforalpremedicationwithclonidineandmetoprololonintraoperativehemodynamicsandsurgicalconditionsduringfunctionalendoscopicsinussurgery
AT kumarlakshmi comparisonofeffectsoforalpremedicationwithclonidineandmetoprololonintraoperativehemodynamicsandsurgicalconditionsduringfunctionalendoscopicsinussurgery
AT nairsureshgangadharan comparisonofeffectsoforalpremedicationwithclonidineandmetoprololonintraoperativehemodynamicsandsurgicalconditionsduringfunctionalendoscopicsinussurgery