Cargando…

A prospective, randomized, double blinded comparison of intranasal dexmedetomodine vs intranasal ketamine in combination with intravenous midazolam for procedural sedation in school aged children undergoing MRI

BACKGROUND: For optimum magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image quality and to ensure precise diagnosis, patients have to remain motionless. We studied the effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine and ketamine with intravenous midazolam for pre-procedural and procedural sedation in school aged children....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ibrahim, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886223
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.134495
_version_ 1782336234628055040
author Ibrahim, Mohamed
author_facet Ibrahim, Mohamed
author_sort Ibrahim, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For optimum magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image quality and to ensure precise diagnosis, patients have to remain motionless. We studied the effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine and ketamine with intravenous midazolam for pre-procedural and procedural sedation in school aged children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children were randomly allocated to one of two groups: (Group D) received intranasal dexmedetomidine 3 μg kg(–1) and (Group K) received intranasal ketamine 7 mg kg(–1). Sedation levels 10, 20 and 30 min after drug instillation were evaluated using a Modified Ramsay sedation scale. A 4-point score was used to evaluate patients when they were separated from their parents and their response to intravenous cannulation. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable in terms of the child's anxiety at presentation (P = 0.245). We observed that Group K achieved faster sedation at 10 min point with P < 0.05. A comparable sedation score at 20 and 30 min were noted. The two groups were comparable regarding to the child's acceptance of nasal administration (P = 0.65). The sedation failure rate was insignificantly differ between groups (13.7% vs. 20.6% for Group D and K respectively). Heart rate and systolic blood pressure showed a significant difference between the two groups starting from the point of 20 min. CONCLUSION: Intranasal dexmedetomidine 3 μg kg(–1) or ketamine 7 mg kg(–1) can be used safely and effectively to induce a state of moderate conscious sedation and to facilitate parents’ separation and IV cannulation. Addition of midazolam in a dose not sufficient alone to produce the target sedation achieved our goal of deep level of sedation suitable for MRI procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4173611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41736112014-10-22 A prospective, randomized, double blinded comparison of intranasal dexmedetomodine vs intranasal ketamine in combination with intravenous midazolam for procedural sedation in school aged children undergoing MRI Ibrahim, Mohamed Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: For optimum magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image quality and to ensure precise diagnosis, patients have to remain motionless. We studied the effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine and ketamine with intravenous midazolam for pre-procedural and procedural sedation in school aged children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children were randomly allocated to one of two groups: (Group D) received intranasal dexmedetomidine 3 μg kg(–1) and (Group K) received intranasal ketamine 7 mg kg(–1). Sedation levels 10, 20 and 30 min after drug instillation were evaluated using a Modified Ramsay sedation scale. A 4-point score was used to evaluate patients when they were separated from their parents and their response to intravenous cannulation. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable in terms of the child's anxiety at presentation (P = 0.245). We observed that Group K achieved faster sedation at 10 min point with P < 0.05. A comparable sedation score at 20 and 30 min were noted. The two groups were comparable regarding to the child's acceptance of nasal administration (P = 0.65). The sedation failure rate was insignificantly differ between groups (13.7% vs. 20.6% for Group D and K respectively). Heart rate and systolic blood pressure showed a significant difference between the two groups starting from the point of 20 min. CONCLUSION: Intranasal dexmedetomidine 3 μg kg(–1) or ketamine 7 mg kg(–1) can be used safely and effectively to induce a state of moderate conscious sedation and to facilitate parents’ separation and IV cannulation. Addition of midazolam in a dose not sufficient alone to produce the target sedation achieved our goal of deep level of sedation suitable for MRI procedure. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4173611/ /pubmed/25886223 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.134495 Text en Copyright: © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ibrahim, Mohamed
A prospective, randomized, double blinded comparison of intranasal dexmedetomodine vs intranasal ketamine in combination with intravenous midazolam for procedural sedation in school aged children undergoing MRI
title A prospective, randomized, double blinded comparison of intranasal dexmedetomodine vs intranasal ketamine in combination with intravenous midazolam for procedural sedation in school aged children undergoing MRI
title_full A prospective, randomized, double blinded comparison of intranasal dexmedetomodine vs intranasal ketamine in combination with intravenous midazolam for procedural sedation in school aged children undergoing MRI
title_fullStr A prospective, randomized, double blinded comparison of intranasal dexmedetomodine vs intranasal ketamine in combination with intravenous midazolam for procedural sedation in school aged children undergoing MRI
title_full_unstemmed A prospective, randomized, double blinded comparison of intranasal dexmedetomodine vs intranasal ketamine in combination with intravenous midazolam for procedural sedation in school aged children undergoing MRI
title_short A prospective, randomized, double blinded comparison of intranasal dexmedetomodine vs intranasal ketamine in combination with intravenous midazolam for procedural sedation in school aged children undergoing MRI
title_sort prospective, randomized, double blinded comparison of intranasal dexmedetomodine vs intranasal ketamine in combination with intravenous midazolam for procedural sedation in school aged children undergoing mri
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886223
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.134495
work_keys_str_mv AT ibrahimmohamed aprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcomparisonofintranasaldexmedetomodinevsintranasalketamineincombinationwithintravenousmidazolamforproceduralsedationinschoolagedchildrenundergoingmri
AT ibrahimmohamed prospectiverandomizeddoubleblindedcomparisonofintranasaldexmedetomodinevsintranasalketamineincombinationwithintravenousmidazolamforproceduralsedationinschoolagedchildrenundergoingmri