Cargando…

The Influence of Repressor DNA Binding Site Architecture on Transcriptional Control

How the architecture of DNA binding sites dictates the extent of repression of promoters is not well understood. Here, we addressed the importance of the number and information content of the three direct repeats (DRs) in the binding and repression of the icdA promoter by the phosphorylated form of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Dan M., Kiley, Patricia J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Microbiology 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25161193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01684-14
_version_ 1782336262024200192
author Park, Dan M.
Kiley, Patricia J.
author_facet Park, Dan M.
Kiley, Patricia J.
author_sort Park, Dan M.
collection PubMed
description How the architecture of DNA binding sites dictates the extent of repression of promoters is not well understood. Here, we addressed the importance of the number and information content of the three direct repeats (DRs) in the binding and repression of the icdA promoter by the phosphorylated form of the global Escherichia coli repressor ArcA (ArcA-P). We show that decreasing the information content of the two sites with the highest information (DR1 and DR2) eliminated ArcA binding to all three DRs and ArcA repression of icdA. Unexpectedly, we also found that DR3 occupancy functions principally in repression, since mutation of this low-information-content site both eliminated DNA binding to DR3 and significantly weakened icdA repression, despite the fact that binding to DR1 and DR2 was intact. In addition, increasing the information content of any one of the three DRs or addition of a fourth DR increased ArcA-dependent repression but perturbed signal-dependent regulation of repression. Thus, our data show that the information content and number of DR elements are critical architectural features for maintaining a balance between high-affinity binding and signal-dependent regulation of icdA promoter function in response to changes in ArcA-P levels. Optimization of such architectural features may be a common strategy to either dampen or enhance the sensitivity of DNA binding among the members of the large OmpR/PhoB family of regulators as well as other transcription factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4173790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher American Society of Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41737902014-10-06 The Influence of Repressor DNA Binding Site Architecture on Transcriptional Control Park, Dan M. Kiley, Patricia J. mBio Research Article How the architecture of DNA binding sites dictates the extent of repression of promoters is not well understood. Here, we addressed the importance of the number and information content of the three direct repeats (DRs) in the binding and repression of the icdA promoter by the phosphorylated form of the global Escherichia coli repressor ArcA (ArcA-P). We show that decreasing the information content of the two sites with the highest information (DR1 and DR2) eliminated ArcA binding to all three DRs and ArcA repression of icdA. Unexpectedly, we also found that DR3 occupancy functions principally in repression, since mutation of this low-information-content site both eliminated DNA binding to DR3 and significantly weakened icdA repression, despite the fact that binding to DR1 and DR2 was intact. In addition, increasing the information content of any one of the three DRs or addition of a fourth DR increased ArcA-dependent repression but perturbed signal-dependent regulation of repression. Thus, our data show that the information content and number of DR elements are critical architectural features for maintaining a balance between high-affinity binding and signal-dependent regulation of icdA promoter function in response to changes in ArcA-P levels. Optimization of such architectural features may be a common strategy to either dampen or enhance the sensitivity of DNA binding among the members of the large OmpR/PhoB family of regulators as well as other transcription factors. American Society of Microbiology 2014-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4173790/ /pubmed/25161193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01684-14 Text en Copyright © 2014 Park and Kiley. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) , which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Park, Dan M.
Kiley, Patricia J.
The Influence of Repressor DNA Binding Site Architecture on Transcriptional Control
title The Influence of Repressor DNA Binding Site Architecture on Transcriptional Control
title_full The Influence of Repressor DNA Binding Site Architecture on Transcriptional Control
title_fullStr The Influence of Repressor DNA Binding Site Architecture on Transcriptional Control
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Repressor DNA Binding Site Architecture on Transcriptional Control
title_short The Influence of Repressor DNA Binding Site Architecture on Transcriptional Control
title_sort influence of repressor dna binding site architecture on transcriptional control
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4173790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25161193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01684-14
work_keys_str_mv AT parkdanm theinfluenceofrepressordnabindingsitearchitectureontranscriptionalcontrol
AT kileypatriciaj theinfluenceofrepressordnabindingsitearchitectureontranscriptionalcontrol
AT parkdanm influenceofrepressordnabindingsitearchitectureontranscriptionalcontrol
AT kileypatriciaj influenceofrepressordnabindingsitearchitectureontranscriptionalcontrol