Cargando…

Comparison of Vertical and Inverted-T Mammaplasties Using Photographic Measurements

BACKGROUND: Surgeons have long debated the relative merits of vertical and inverted-T mammaplasties. These debates have centered on surgeons’ opinions. Without measurements, this controversy is unlikely to be resolved. This study compares these common techniques using a recently published measuremen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Swanson, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25289283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000034
_version_ 1782336303125233664
author Swanson, Eric
author_facet Swanson, Eric
author_sort Swanson, Eric
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgeons have long debated the relative merits of vertical and inverted-T mammaplasties. These debates have centered on surgeons’ opinions. Without measurements, this controversy is unlikely to be resolved. This study compares these common techniques using a recently published measurement system. Such a study using measurements on photographs matched for size and orientation has not been previously published. METHODS: A prospective group of women undergoing primary vertical mastopexies, augmentation/mastopexies, and reductions (n = 78) was compared with a retrospective group of women treated with inverted-T mastopexies, augmentation/mastopexies, and reductions (n = 35). Consecutive patients with photographs at least 3 months after surgery and no subsequent procedures were evaluated. RESULTS: All patient groups demonstrated a significant elevation (P < 0.001) of the breast mound. Vertical mastopexy, but not inverted-T mastopexy, increased breast projection and upper pole projection (P < 0.008). Neither vertical nor inverted-T breast reduction significantly increased breast projection. Vertical breast reduction better preserved breast projection (P < 0.017) than the inverted-T technique. Vertical reduction significantly increased upper pole projection (P < 0.008), but inverted-T reduction did not. The inverted-T breast reduction caused greater breast constriction (reduced lower pole distance) than the vertical technique. Lower pole ratios were significantly higher for inverted-T patients (P < 0.01), indicating boxier lower poles. CONCLUSIONS: Photographic measurements of relevant breast parameters favor the vertical technique over the inverted-T technique and are consistent with anatomical considerations and clinical experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4174109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41741092014-10-06 Comparison of Vertical and Inverted-T Mammaplasties Using Photographic Measurements Swanson, Eric Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Articles BACKGROUND: Surgeons have long debated the relative merits of vertical and inverted-T mammaplasties. These debates have centered on surgeons’ opinions. Without measurements, this controversy is unlikely to be resolved. This study compares these common techniques using a recently published measurement system. Such a study using measurements on photographs matched for size and orientation has not been previously published. METHODS: A prospective group of women undergoing primary vertical mastopexies, augmentation/mastopexies, and reductions (n = 78) was compared with a retrospective group of women treated with inverted-T mastopexies, augmentation/mastopexies, and reductions (n = 35). Consecutive patients with photographs at least 3 months after surgery and no subsequent procedures were evaluated. RESULTS: All patient groups demonstrated a significant elevation (P < 0.001) of the breast mound. Vertical mastopexy, but not inverted-T mastopexy, increased breast projection and upper pole projection (P < 0.008). Neither vertical nor inverted-T breast reduction significantly increased breast projection. Vertical breast reduction better preserved breast projection (P < 0.017) than the inverted-T technique. Vertical reduction significantly increased upper pole projection (P < 0.008), but inverted-T reduction did not. The inverted-T breast reduction caused greater breast constriction (reduced lower pole distance) than the vertical technique. Lower pole ratios were significantly higher for inverted-T patients (P < 0.01), indicating boxier lower poles. CONCLUSIONS: Photographic measurements of relevant breast parameters favor the vertical technique over the inverted-T technique and are consistent with anatomical considerations and clinical experience. Wolters Kluwer Health 2014-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4174109/ /pubmed/25289283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000034 Text en Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. PRS Global Open is a publication of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivitives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Swanson, Eric
Comparison of Vertical and Inverted-T Mammaplasties Using Photographic Measurements
title Comparison of Vertical and Inverted-T Mammaplasties Using Photographic Measurements
title_full Comparison of Vertical and Inverted-T Mammaplasties Using Photographic Measurements
title_fullStr Comparison of Vertical and Inverted-T Mammaplasties Using Photographic Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Vertical and Inverted-T Mammaplasties Using Photographic Measurements
title_short Comparison of Vertical and Inverted-T Mammaplasties Using Photographic Measurements
title_sort comparison of vertical and inverted-t mammaplasties using photographic measurements
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25289283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000034
work_keys_str_mv AT swansoneric comparisonofverticalandinvertedtmammaplastiesusingphotographicmeasurements