Cargando…
Bioprosthetic Tissue Matrices in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal defects are difficult problems encountered by surgeons in multiple specialties. Although current evidence supports the primary repair of these defects with mesh reinforcement, it is unclear which mesh is superior for any given clinical scenario. The purpose of this revi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25289285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000036 |
_version_ | 1782336303590801408 |
---|---|
author | Broyles, Justin M. Abt, Nicholas B. Sacks, Justin M. Butler, Charles E. |
author_facet | Broyles, Justin M. Abt, Nicholas B. Sacks, Justin M. Butler, Charles E. |
author_sort | Broyles, Justin M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal defects are difficult problems encountered by surgeons in multiple specialties. Although current evidence supports the primary repair of these defects with mesh reinforcement, it is unclear which mesh is superior for any given clinical scenario. The purpose of this review was to explore the characteristics of and clinical relevance behind bioprosthetic tissue matrices in an effort to better clarify their role in abdominal wall reconstruction. METHODS: We reviewed the peer-reviewed literature on the use of bioprosthetic mesh in human subjects. Basic science articles and large retrospective and prospective reviews were included in author’s analysis. The clinical performance and characteristics of 13 bioprosthetic tissue matrices were evaluated. RESULTS: The majority of the products evaluated perform well in contaminated fields, where the risk of wound-healing difficulties is high. Clinical outcomes, which included infection, reherniation, and bulge formation, were variable, and the majority of the studies had a mean follow-up of less than 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Although bioprosthetic matrix has a multitude of indications within the growing field of abdominal wall reconstruction, the functionality, regenerative capacity, and long-term fate of these products have yet to be fully established. Furthermore, the clinical performance, indications, and contraindications for each type of matrix need to be fully evaluated in long-term outcome studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4174111 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41741112014-10-06 Bioprosthetic Tissue Matrices in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Broyles, Justin M. Abt, Nicholas B. Sacks, Justin M. Butler, Charles E. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Articles BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal defects are difficult problems encountered by surgeons in multiple specialties. Although current evidence supports the primary repair of these defects with mesh reinforcement, it is unclear which mesh is superior for any given clinical scenario. The purpose of this review was to explore the characteristics of and clinical relevance behind bioprosthetic tissue matrices in an effort to better clarify their role in abdominal wall reconstruction. METHODS: We reviewed the peer-reviewed literature on the use of bioprosthetic mesh in human subjects. Basic science articles and large retrospective and prospective reviews were included in author’s analysis. The clinical performance and characteristics of 13 bioprosthetic tissue matrices were evaluated. RESULTS: The majority of the products evaluated perform well in contaminated fields, where the risk of wound-healing difficulties is high. Clinical outcomes, which included infection, reherniation, and bulge formation, were variable, and the majority of the studies had a mean follow-up of less than 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Although bioprosthetic matrix has a multitude of indications within the growing field of abdominal wall reconstruction, the functionality, regenerative capacity, and long-term fate of these products have yet to be fully established. Furthermore, the clinical performance, indications, and contraindications for each type of matrix need to be fully evaluated in long-term outcome studies. Wolters Kluwer Health 2014-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4174111/ /pubmed/25289285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000036 Text en Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. PRS Global Open is a publication of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivitives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Broyles, Justin M. Abt, Nicholas B. Sacks, Justin M. Butler, Charles E. Bioprosthetic Tissue Matrices in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction |
title | Bioprosthetic Tissue Matrices in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction |
title_full | Bioprosthetic Tissue Matrices in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Bioprosthetic Tissue Matrices in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Bioprosthetic Tissue Matrices in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction |
title_short | Bioprosthetic Tissue Matrices in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction |
title_sort | bioprosthetic tissue matrices in complex abdominal wall reconstruction |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25289285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT broylesjustinm bioprosthetictissuematricesincomplexabdominalwallreconstruction AT abtnicholasb bioprosthetictissuematricesincomplexabdominalwallreconstruction AT sacksjustinm bioprosthetictissuematricesincomplexabdominalwallreconstruction AT butlercharlese bioprosthetictissuematricesincomplexabdominalwallreconstruction |