Cargando…
Comparison between Freeze-dried and Ready-to-use AlloDerm in Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction
BACKGROUND: AlloDerm, a brand of acellular dermal matrix, is commonly used as an internal hammock to support the tissue expander or permanent implant in breast reconstruction. The aim of our study is to evaluate the complication rates associated with the freeze-dried (FD) AlloDerm and the ready-to-u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25289313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000061 |
_version_ | 1782336312203804672 |
---|---|
author | Yuen, James C. Yue, Connie J. Erickson, Stephen W. Cooper, Shannon Boneti, Cristiano Henry-Tillman, Ronda Klimberg, Suzanne |
author_facet | Yuen, James C. Yue, Connie J. Erickson, Stephen W. Cooper, Shannon Boneti, Cristiano Henry-Tillman, Ronda Klimberg, Suzanne |
author_sort | Yuen, James C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: AlloDerm, a brand of acellular dermal matrix, is commonly used as an internal hammock to support the tissue expander or permanent implant in breast reconstruction. The aim of our study is to evaluate the complication rates associated with the freeze-dried (FD) AlloDerm and the ready-to-use (RTU) AlloDerm. METHODS: This institutional review board–approved retrospective study involved 103 patients who underwent immediate postmastectomy breast reconstructions from June 2011 to August 2012. The first 51 patients underwent 96 immediate breast reconstructions with FD AlloDerm. The subsequent 52 patients underwent 100 immediate breast reconstructions with RTU AlloDerm. Patient demographics, postoperative complication rates in study cohort, and complication rates stratified by body mass index (BMI) were analyzed. RESULTS: Multiple patient demographics in the 2 cohorts are closely matched (P > 0.05). RTU AlloDerm was associated with higher rates of seroma and cellulitis compared with FD AlloDerm (22.0% vs 18.8%, P = 0.599 and 21.0% vs 12.5%, P = 0.129, respectively). Significantly higher rates of seroma and cellulitis were found in patients with BMI ≥ 30 compared with BMI < 30 (34.5% vs 9.2%, P < 0.001 and 29.9% vs 6.4%, P < 0.001, respectively). A generalized linear mixed model shows that obesity and RTU AlloDerm are statistically significant predictors of cellulitis (adjusted odds ratio = 10.413, P < 0.001 and adjusted odds ratio = 3.712, P = 0.011, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates a clinically higher postoperative complication rate in immediate breast reconstruction with RTU AlloDerm compared with FD AlloDerm and highlights the unfavorable risk factor correlation with significant obesity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4174145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41741452014-10-06 Comparison between Freeze-dried and Ready-to-use AlloDerm in Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction Yuen, James C. Yue, Connie J. Erickson, Stephen W. Cooper, Shannon Boneti, Cristiano Henry-Tillman, Ronda Klimberg, Suzanne Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Articles BACKGROUND: AlloDerm, a brand of acellular dermal matrix, is commonly used as an internal hammock to support the tissue expander or permanent implant in breast reconstruction. The aim of our study is to evaluate the complication rates associated with the freeze-dried (FD) AlloDerm and the ready-to-use (RTU) AlloDerm. METHODS: This institutional review board–approved retrospective study involved 103 patients who underwent immediate postmastectomy breast reconstructions from June 2011 to August 2012. The first 51 patients underwent 96 immediate breast reconstructions with FD AlloDerm. The subsequent 52 patients underwent 100 immediate breast reconstructions with RTU AlloDerm. Patient demographics, postoperative complication rates in study cohort, and complication rates stratified by body mass index (BMI) were analyzed. RESULTS: Multiple patient demographics in the 2 cohorts are closely matched (P > 0.05). RTU AlloDerm was associated with higher rates of seroma and cellulitis compared with FD AlloDerm (22.0% vs 18.8%, P = 0.599 and 21.0% vs 12.5%, P = 0.129, respectively). Significantly higher rates of seroma and cellulitis were found in patients with BMI ≥ 30 compared with BMI < 30 (34.5% vs 9.2%, P < 0.001 and 29.9% vs 6.4%, P < 0.001, respectively). A generalized linear mixed model shows that obesity and RTU AlloDerm are statistically significant predictors of cellulitis (adjusted odds ratio = 10.413, P < 0.001 and adjusted odds ratio = 3.712, P = 0.011, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates a clinically higher postoperative complication rate in immediate breast reconstruction with RTU AlloDerm compared with FD AlloDerm and highlights the unfavorable risk factor correlation with significant obesity. Wolters Kluwer Health 2014-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4174145/ /pubmed/25289313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000061 Text en Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. PRS Global Open is a publication of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivitives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Yuen, James C. Yue, Connie J. Erickson, Stephen W. Cooper, Shannon Boneti, Cristiano Henry-Tillman, Ronda Klimberg, Suzanne Comparison between Freeze-dried and Ready-to-use AlloDerm in Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction |
title | Comparison between Freeze-dried and Ready-to-use AlloDerm in Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction |
title_full | Comparison between Freeze-dried and Ready-to-use AlloDerm in Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Comparison between Freeze-dried and Ready-to-use AlloDerm in Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Freeze-dried and Ready-to-use AlloDerm in Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction |
title_short | Comparison between Freeze-dried and Ready-to-use AlloDerm in Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction |
title_sort | comparison between freeze-dried and ready-to-use alloderm in alloplastic breast reconstruction |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25289313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000061 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuenjamesc comparisonbetweenfreezedriedandreadytousealloderminalloplasticbreastreconstruction AT yueconniej comparisonbetweenfreezedriedandreadytousealloderminalloplasticbreastreconstruction AT ericksonstephenw comparisonbetweenfreezedriedandreadytousealloderminalloplasticbreastreconstruction AT coopershannon comparisonbetweenfreezedriedandreadytousealloderminalloplasticbreastreconstruction AT boneticristiano comparisonbetweenfreezedriedandreadytousealloderminalloplasticbreastreconstruction AT henrytillmanronda comparisonbetweenfreezedriedandreadytousealloderminalloplasticbreastreconstruction AT klimbergsuzanne comparisonbetweenfreezedriedandreadytousealloderminalloplasticbreastreconstruction |