Cargando…

Does a Nebulized Heparin/N-acetylcysteine Protocol Improve Outcomes in Adult Smoke Inhalation?

BACKGROUND: Smoke inhalation is a major source of morbidity and mortality. Heparin and N-acetylcysteine treatment has potential efficacy in inhalation injury. We investigated the impact of a heparin/N-acetylcysteine/albuterol nebulization protocol in adult patients with inhalation injury. METHODS: A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kashefi, Natalie S., Nathan, Jonathan I., Dissanaike, Sharmila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25289358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000121
_version_ 1782336332084805632
author Kashefi, Natalie S.
Nathan, Jonathan I.
Dissanaike, Sharmila
author_facet Kashefi, Natalie S.
Nathan, Jonathan I.
Dissanaike, Sharmila
author_sort Kashefi, Natalie S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Smoke inhalation is a major source of morbidity and mortality. Heparin and N-acetylcysteine treatment has potential efficacy in inhalation injury. We investigated the impact of a heparin/N-acetylcysteine/albuterol nebulization protocol in adult patients with inhalation injury. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of adult inhalation injury patients, admitted to a regional burn center between January 2011 and July 2012, who underwent a protocol of alternating treatments of heparin and N-acetylcysteine/albuterol nebulization every 4 hours. The study cohort was matched 1:1 by age, sex, and burn size to a control cohort admitted within 5 years before protocol implementation. RESULTS: The study (n = 20) and control cohorts (n = 20) were well matched, with nearly identical age (50 vs 49 years), sex distribution (70% male), burn size (total body surface area, 22% vs 21%), and inhalation injury, except grade I injuries (79% vs 47%, P = 0.01). The protocol did not change mortality (30% vs 25%, P = 0.72) or duration of mechanical ventilation (8.5 vs 8.8 days, P = 0.9). There was no difference in development of sepsis (40% vs 33%, P = 0.7) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (15% vs 10%, P = 1); however, those who received the protocol were more likely to develop pneumonia (45% vs 11%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a heparin/N-acetylcysteine/albuterol protocol did not reduce mortality or duration of mechanical ventilation in this cohort of adults with inhalation injury and resulted in a significant increase in pneumonia rates. Larger prospective studies are necessary, with close attention paid to minimizing the infection risk incurred from frequent administration of nebulized medications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4174237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41742372014-10-06 Does a Nebulized Heparin/N-acetylcysteine Protocol Improve Outcomes in Adult Smoke Inhalation? Kashefi, Natalie S. Nathan, Jonathan I. Dissanaike, Sharmila Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Articles BACKGROUND: Smoke inhalation is a major source of morbidity and mortality. Heparin and N-acetylcysteine treatment has potential efficacy in inhalation injury. We investigated the impact of a heparin/N-acetylcysteine/albuterol nebulization protocol in adult patients with inhalation injury. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of adult inhalation injury patients, admitted to a regional burn center between January 2011 and July 2012, who underwent a protocol of alternating treatments of heparin and N-acetylcysteine/albuterol nebulization every 4 hours. The study cohort was matched 1:1 by age, sex, and burn size to a control cohort admitted within 5 years before protocol implementation. RESULTS: The study (n = 20) and control cohorts (n = 20) were well matched, with nearly identical age (50 vs 49 years), sex distribution (70% male), burn size (total body surface area, 22% vs 21%), and inhalation injury, except grade I injuries (79% vs 47%, P = 0.01). The protocol did not change mortality (30% vs 25%, P = 0.72) or duration of mechanical ventilation (8.5 vs 8.8 days, P = 0.9). There was no difference in development of sepsis (40% vs 33%, P = 0.7) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (15% vs 10%, P = 1); however, those who received the protocol were more likely to develop pneumonia (45% vs 11%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a heparin/N-acetylcysteine/albuterol protocol did not reduce mortality or duration of mechanical ventilation in this cohort of adults with inhalation injury and resulted in a significant increase in pneumonia rates. Larger prospective studies are necessary, with close attention paid to minimizing the infection risk incurred from frequent administration of nebulized medications. Wolters Kluwer Health 2014-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4174237/ /pubmed/25289358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000121 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. PRS Global Open is a publication of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kashefi, Natalie S.
Nathan, Jonathan I.
Dissanaike, Sharmila
Does a Nebulized Heparin/N-acetylcysteine Protocol Improve Outcomes in Adult Smoke Inhalation?
title Does a Nebulized Heparin/N-acetylcysteine Protocol Improve Outcomes in Adult Smoke Inhalation?
title_full Does a Nebulized Heparin/N-acetylcysteine Protocol Improve Outcomes in Adult Smoke Inhalation?
title_fullStr Does a Nebulized Heparin/N-acetylcysteine Protocol Improve Outcomes in Adult Smoke Inhalation?
title_full_unstemmed Does a Nebulized Heparin/N-acetylcysteine Protocol Improve Outcomes in Adult Smoke Inhalation?
title_short Does a Nebulized Heparin/N-acetylcysteine Protocol Improve Outcomes in Adult Smoke Inhalation?
title_sort does a nebulized heparin/n-acetylcysteine protocol improve outcomes in adult smoke inhalation?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25289358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000121
work_keys_str_mv AT kashefinatalies doesanebulizedheparinnacetylcysteineprotocolimproveoutcomesinadultsmokeinhalation
AT nathanjonathani doesanebulizedheparinnacetylcysteineprotocolimproveoutcomesinadultsmokeinhalation
AT dissanaikesharmila doesanebulizedheparinnacetylcysteineprotocolimproveoutcomesinadultsmokeinhalation