Cargando…

Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II

BACKGROUND: Macro-bond strength tests resulted in cohesive failures and overestimation of bond strengths. To reduce the flaws, micro-bond strength tests were introduced. They are the most commonly used bond-strength tests. OBJECTIVE: Thus the objective of this review is to critically review the reli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sirisha, Kantheti, Rambabu, Tankonda, Ravishankar, Yalavarthi, Ravikumar, Pabbati
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25298640
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.139823
_version_ 1782336378227392512
author Sirisha, Kantheti
Rambabu, Tankonda
Ravishankar, Yalavarthi
Ravikumar, Pabbati
author_facet Sirisha, Kantheti
Rambabu, Tankonda
Ravishankar, Yalavarthi
Ravikumar, Pabbati
author_sort Sirisha, Kantheti
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Macro-bond strength tests resulted in cohesive failures and overestimation of bond strengths. To reduce the flaws, micro-bond strength tests were introduced. They are the most commonly used bond-strength tests. OBJECTIVE: Thus the objective of this review is to critically review the reliability of micro-bond strength tests used to evaluate resin-tooth interface. DATA COLLECTION: Relevant articles published between January 1994 and July 2013 were collected from Pubmed database, Google scholar and hand searched journals of Conservative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental materials. DATA SYNTHESIS: Variables that influence the test outcome are categorized into substrate related factors, factors related to specimen properties, specimen preparation and test methodology. Impact of these variables on the test outcome is critically analyzed. CONCLUSION: Micro-bond tests are more reliable than macro-bond tests. However, no standard format exists for reporting the bond strength tests which could lead to misinterpretation of the data and bonding abilities of adhesives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4174699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41746992014-10-08 Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II Sirisha, Kantheti Rambabu, Tankonda Ravishankar, Yalavarthi Ravikumar, Pabbati J Conserv Dent Review Article BACKGROUND: Macro-bond strength tests resulted in cohesive failures and overestimation of bond strengths. To reduce the flaws, micro-bond strength tests were introduced. They are the most commonly used bond-strength tests. OBJECTIVE: Thus the objective of this review is to critically review the reliability of micro-bond strength tests used to evaluate resin-tooth interface. DATA COLLECTION: Relevant articles published between January 1994 and July 2013 were collected from Pubmed database, Google scholar and hand searched journals of Conservative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental materials. DATA SYNTHESIS: Variables that influence the test outcome are categorized into substrate related factors, factors related to specimen properties, specimen preparation and test methodology. Impact of these variables on the test outcome is critically analyzed. CONCLUSION: Micro-bond tests are more reliable than macro-bond tests. However, no standard format exists for reporting the bond strength tests which could lead to misinterpretation of the data and bonding abilities of adhesives. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4174699/ /pubmed/25298640 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.139823 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Sirisha, Kantheti
Rambabu, Tankonda
Ravishankar, Yalavarthi
Ravikumar, Pabbati
Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II
title Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II
title_full Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II
title_fullStr Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II
title_full_unstemmed Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II
title_short Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II
title_sort validity of bond strength tests: a critical review-part ii
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25298640
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.139823
work_keys_str_mv AT sirishakantheti validityofbondstrengthtestsacriticalreviewpartii
AT rambabutankonda validityofbondstrengthtestsacriticalreviewpartii
AT ravishankaryalavarthi validityofbondstrengthtestsacriticalreviewpartii
AT ravikumarpabbati validityofbondstrengthtestsacriticalreviewpartii