Cargando…
Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II
BACKGROUND: Macro-bond strength tests resulted in cohesive failures and overestimation of bond strengths. To reduce the flaws, micro-bond strength tests were introduced. They are the most commonly used bond-strength tests. OBJECTIVE: Thus the objective of this review is to critically review the reli...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25298640 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.139823 |
_version_ | 1782336378227392512 |
---|---|
author | Sirisha, Kantheti Rambabu, Tankonda Ravishankar, Yalavarthi Ravikumar, Pabbati |
author_facet | Sirisha, Kantheti Rambabu, Tankonda Ravishankar, Yalavarthi Ravikumar, Pabbati |
author_sort | Sirisha, Kantheti |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Macro-bond strength tests resulted in cohesive failures and overestimation of bond strengths. To reduce the flaws, micro-bond strength tests were introduced. They are the most commonly used bond-strength tests. OBJECTIVE: Thus the objective of this review is to critically review the reliability of micro-bond strength tests used to evaluate resin-tooth interface. DATA COLLECTION: Relevant articles published between January 1994 and July 2013 were collected from Pubmed database, Google scholar and hand searched journals of Conservative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental materials. DATA SYNTHESIS: Variables that influence the test outcome are categorized into substrate related factors, factors related to specimen properties, specimen preparation and test methodology. Impact of these variables on the test outcome is critically analyzed. CONCLUSION: Micro-bond tests are more reliable than macro-bond tests. However, no standard format exists for reporting the bond strength tests which could lead to misinterpretation of the data and bonding abilities of adhesives. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4174699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41746992014-10-08 Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II Sirisha, Kantheti Rambabu, Tankonda Ravishankar, Yalavarthi Ravikumar, Pabbati J Conserv Dent Review Article BACKGROUND: Macro-bond strength tests resulted in cohesive failures and overestimation of bond strengths. To reduce the flaws, micro-bond strength tests were introduced. They are the most commonly used bond-strength tests. OBJECTIVE: Thus the objective of this review is to critically review the reliability of micro-bond strength tests used to evaluate resin-tooth interface. DATA COLLECTION: Relevant articles published between January 1994 and July 2013 were collected from Pubmed database, Google scholar and hand searched journals of Conservative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental materials. DATA SYNTHESIS: Variables that influence the test outcome are categorized into substrate related factors, factors related to specimen properties, specimen preparation and test methodology. Impact of these variables on the test outcome is critically analyzed. CONCLUSION: Micro-bond tests are more reliable than macro-bond tests. However, no standard format exists for reporting the bond strength tests which could lead to misinterpretation of the data and bonding abilities of adhesives. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4174699/ /pubmed/25298640 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.139823 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Sirisha, Kantheti Rambabu, Tankonda Ravishankar, Yalavarthi Ravikumar, Pabbati Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II |
title | Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II |
title_full | Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II |
title_fullStr | Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II |
title_short | Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II |
title_sort | validity of bond strength tests: a critical review-part ii |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25298640 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.139823 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sirishakantheti validityofbondstrengthtestsacriticalreviewpartii AT rambabutankonda validityofbondstrengthtestsacriticalreviewpartii AT ravishankaryalavarthi validityofbondstrengthtestsacriticalreviewpartii AT ravikumarpabbati validityofbondstrengthtestsacriticalreviewpartii |