Cargando…

Influence of citric acid on the surface texture of glass ionomer restorative materials

AIM: This study determined the effectiveness of G-coat plus surface protective agent over petroleum jelly on the surface texture of conventional Glass ionomer restorative materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three chemically cured conventional glass ionomer restorative materials type II, type IX and ke...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reddy, Dappili Swami Ranga, Kumar, Ramachandran Anil, Venkatesan, Sokkalingam Mothilal, Narayan, Gopal Shankar, Duraivel, Dasarathan, Indra, Rajamani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25298643
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.139830
_version_ 1782336378965590016
author Reddy, Dappili Swami Ranga
Kumar, Ramachandran Anil
Venkatesan, Sokkalingam Mothilal
Narayan, Gopal Shankar
Duraivel, Dasarathan
Indra, Rajamani
author_facet Reddy, Dappili Swami Ranga
Kumar, Ramachandran Anil
Venkatesan, Sokkalingam Mothilal
Narayan, Gopal Shankar
Duraivel, Dasarathan
Indra, Rajamani
author_sort Reddy, Dappili Swami Ranga
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study determined the effectiveness of G-coat plus surface protective agent over petroleum jelly on the surface texture of conventional Glass ionomer restorative materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three chemically cured conventional glass ionomer restorative materials type II, type IX and ketac molar were evaluated in this study. Sixty specimens were made for each restorative material. They were divided into two groups of thirty specimens each. Of the sixty specimens, thirty were coated with G-coat plus (a nano-filler coating) and the rest with petroleum jelly. Thirty samples of both protective coating agents were randomly divided into six groups of five specimens and conditioned in citric acid solutions of differing pH (pH 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7). Each specimen was kept in citric acid for three hours a day, and the rest of time stored in salivary substitute. This procedure was repeated for 8 days. After conditioning, the surface roughness (Ra, μm) of each specimen was measured using a surface profilometer (Taylor & Habson, UK). Data was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's HSD test at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: The surface textures of all the tested glass ionomer restorative materials protected with G-coat plus were not significantly affected by acids at low pH. The surface textures of all the tested glass ionomer restorative materials protected with petroleum jelly coating were significantly affected by acids at low pH. CONCLUSION: The effects of pH on the surface texture of glass ionomer restoratives are material dependent. Among all the materials tested the surface texture of Type II GIC (Group I) revealed marked deterioration when conditioned in solutions of low pH and was statistically significant. Hence, a protective coating either with G-coat plus or with light polymerized low viscosity unfilled resin adhesives is mandatory for all the glass ionomer restorations to increase the wear resistance of the restorative materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4174702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41747022014-10-08 Influence of citric acid on the surface texture of glass ionomer restorative materials Reddy, Dappili Swami Ranga Kumar, Ramachandran Anil Venkatesan, Sokkalingam Mothilal Narayan, Gopal Shankar Duraivel, Dasarathan Indra, Rajamani J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: This study determined the effectiveness of G-coat plus surface protective agent over petroleum jelly on the surface texture of conventional Glass ionomer restorative materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three chemically cured conventional glass ionomer restorative materials type II, type IX and ketac molar were evaluated in this study. Sixty specimens were made for each restorative material. They were divided into two groups of thirty specimens each. Of the sixty specimens, thirty were coated with G-coat plus (a nano-filler coating) and the rest with petroleum jelly. Thirty samples of both protective coating agents were randomly divided into six groups of five specimens and conditioned in citric acid solutions of differing pH (pH 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7). Each specimen was kept in citric acid for three hours a day, and the rest of time stored in salivary substitute. This procedure was repeated for 8 days. After conditioning, the surface roughness (Ra, μm) of each specimen was measured using a surface profilometer (Taylor & Habson, UK). Data was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's HSD test at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: The surface textures of all the tested glass ionomer restorative materials protected with G-coat plus were not significantly affected by acids at low pH. The surface textures of all the tested glass ionomer restorative materials protected with petroleum jelly coating were significantly affected by acids at low pH. CONCLUSION: The effects of pH on the surface texture of glass ionomer restoratives are material dependent. Among all the materials tested the surface texture of Type II GIC (Group I) revealed marked deterioration when conditioned in solutions of low pH and was statistically significant. Hence, a protective coating either with G-coat plus or with light polymerized low viscosity unfilled resin adhesives is mandatory for all the glass ionomer restorations to increase the wear resistance of the restorative materials. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4174702/ /pubmed/25298643 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.139830 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Reddy, Dappili Swami Ranga
Kumar, Ramachandran Anil
Venkatesan, Sokkalingam Mothilal
Narayan, Gopal Shankar
Duraivel, Dasarathan
Indra, Rajamani
Influence of citric acid on the surface texture of glass ionomer restorative materials
title Influence of citric acid on the surface texture of glass ionomer restorative materials
title_full Influence of citric acid on the surface texture of glass ionomer restorative materials
title_fullStr Influence of citric acid on the surface texture of glass ionomer restorative materials
title_full_unstemmed Influence of citric acid on the surface texture of glass ionomer restorative materials
title_short Influence of citric acid on the surface texture of glass ionomer restorative materials
title_sort influence of citric acid on the surface texture of glass ionomer restorative materials
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25298643
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.139830
work_keys_str_mv AT reddydappiliswamiranga influenceofcitricacidonthesurfacetextureofglassionomerrestorativematerials
AT kumarramachandrananil influenceofcitricacidonthesurfacetextureofglassionomerrestorativematerials
AT venkatesansokkalingammothilal influenceofcitricacidonthesurfacetextureofglassionomerrestorativematerials
AT narayangopalshankar influenceofcitricacidonthesurfacetextureofglassionomerrestorativematerials
AT duraiveldasarathan influenceofcitricacidonthesurfacetextureofglassionomerrestorativematerials
AT indrarajamani influenceofcitricacidonthesurfacetextureofglassionomerrestorativematerials