Cargando…

A Three-Year Field Validation Study to Improve the Integrated Pest Management of Hot Pepper

To improve the integrated pest management (IPM) of hot pepper, field study was conducted in Hwasung from 2010 to 2012 and an IPM system was developed to help growers decide when to apply pesticides to control anthracnose, tobacco budworm, Phytophthora blight, bacterial wilt, and bacterial leaf spot....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Ji-Hoon, Yun, Sung-Chul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Plant Pathology 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25288956
http://dx.doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.01.2013.0002
_version_ 1782336402344640512
author Kim, Ji-Hoon
Yun, Sung-Chul
author_facet Kim, Ji-Hoon
Yun, Sung-Chul
author_sort Kim, Ji-Hoon
collection PubMed
description To improve the integrated pest management (IPM) of hot pepper, field study was conducted in Hwasung from 2010 to 2012 and an IPM system was developed to help growers decide when to apply pesticides to control anthracnose, tobacco budworm, Phytophthora blight, bacterial wilt, and bacterial leaf spot. The three field treatments consisted of IPM sprays following the forecast model advisory, a periodic spray at 7-to-10-day intervals, and no spray (control). The number of annual pesticide applications for the IPM treatment ranged from six to eight, whereas the plots subjected to the periodic treatment received pesticide 11 or 12 times annually for three years. Compared to the former strategy, our improved IPM strategy features more intense pest management, with frequent spraying for anthracnose and mixed spraying for tobacco budworm or Phytophthora blight. The incidences for no pesticide control in 2010, 2011, and 2012 were 91, 97.6, and 41.4%, respectively. Conversely, the incidences for the IPM treatment for those years were 7.6, 62.6, and 2%, and the yields from IPM-treated plots were 48.6 kg, 12.1 kg, and 48.8 kg. The incidence and yield in the IPM-treated plots were almost the same as those of the periodic treatment except in 2011, in which no unnecessary sprays were given, meaning that the IPM control was quite successful. From reviewing eight years of field work, sophisticated forecasts that optimize pesticide spray timing reveal that reliance on pesticides can be reduced without compromising yield. Eco-friendly strategies can be implemented in the pest management of hot pepper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4174811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Korean Society of Plant Pathology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41748112014-10-06 A Three-Year Field Validation Study to Improve the Integrated Pest Management of Hot Pepper Kim, Ji-Hoon Yun, Sung-Chul Plant Pathol J Research Article To improve the integrated pest management (IPM) of hot pepper, field study was conducted in Hwasung from 2010 to 2012 and an IPM system was developed to help growers decide when to apply pesticides to control anthracnose, tobacco budworm, Phytophthora blight, bacterial wilt, and bacterial leaf spot. The three field treatments consisted of IPM sprays following the forecast model advisory, a periodic spray at 7-to-10-day intervals, and no spray (control). The number of annual pesticide applications for the IPM treatment ranged from six to eight, whereas the plots subjected to the periodic treatment received pesticide 11 or 12 times annually for three years. Compared to the former strategy, our improved IPM strategy features more intense pest management, with frequent spraying for anthracnose and mixed spraying for tobacco budworm or Phytophthora blight. The incidences for no pesticide control in 2010, 2011, and 2012 were 91, 97.6, and 41.4%, respectively. Conversely, the incidences for the IPM treatment for those years were 7.6, 62.6, and 2%, and the yields from IPM-treated plots were 48.6 kg, 12.1 kg, and 48.8 kg. The incidence and yield in the IPM-treated plots were almost the same as those of the periodic treatment except in 2011, in which no unnecessary sprays were given, meaning that the IPM control was quite successful. From reviewing eight years of field work, sophisticated forecasts that optimize pesticide spray timing reveal that reliance on pesticides can be reduced without compromising yield. Eco-friendly strategies can be implemented in the pest management of hot pepper. Korean Society of Plant Pathology 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4174811/ /pubmed/25288956 http://dx.doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.01.2013.0002 Text en ©The Korean Society of Plant Pathology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Ji-Hoon
Yun, Sung-Chul
A Three-Year Field Validation Study to Improve the Integrated Pest Management of Hot Pepper
title A Three-Year Field Validation Study to Improve the Integrated Pest Management of Hot Pepper
title_full A Three-Year Field Validation Study to Improve the Integrated Pest Management of Hot Pepper
title_fullStr A Three-Year Field Validation Study to Improve the Integrated Pest Management of Hot Pepper
title_full_unstemmed A Three-Year Field Validation Study to Improve the Integrated Pest Management of Hot Pepper
title_short A Three-Year Field Validation Study to Improve the Integrated Pest Management of Hot Pepper
title_sort three-year field validation study to improve the integrated pest management of hot pepper
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25288956
http://dx.doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.01.2013.0002
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjihoon athreeyearfieldvalidationstudytoimprovetheintegratedpestmanagementofhotpepper
AT yunsungchul athreeyearfieldvalidationstudytoimprovetheintegratedpestmanagementofhotpepper
AT kimjihoon threeyearfieldvalidationstudytoimprovetheintegratedpestmanagementofhotpepper
AT yunsungchul threeyearfieldvalidationstudytoimprovetheintegratedpestmanagementofhotpepper