Cargando…

Historical, Observed, and Modeled Wildfire Severity in Montane Forests of the Colorado Front Range

Large recent fires in the western U.S. have contributed to a perception that fire exclusion has caused an unprecedented occurrence of uncharacteristically severe fires, particularly in lower elevation dry pine forests. In the absence of long-term fire severity records, it is unknown how short-term t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sherriff, Rosemary L., Platt, Rutherford V., Veblen, Thomas T., Schoennagel, Tania L., Gartner, Meredith H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25251103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106971
_version_ 1782336441853935616
author Sherriff, Rosemary L.
Platt, Rutherford V.
Veblen, Thomas T.
Schoennagel, Tania L.
Gartner, Meredith H.
author_facet Sherriff, Rosemary L.
Platt, Rutherford V.
Veblen, Thomas T.
Schoennagel, Tania L.
Gartner, Meredith H.
author_sort Sherriff, Rosemary L.
collection PubMed
description Large recent fires in the western U.S. have contributed to a perception that fire exclusion has caused an unprecedented occurrence of uncharacteristically severe fires, particularly in lower elevation dry pine forests. In the absence of long-term fire severity records, it is unknown how short-term trends compare to fire severity prior to 20(th) century fire exclusion. This study compares historical (i.e. pre-1920) fire severity with observed modern fire severity and modeled potential fire behavior across 564,413 ha of montane forests of the Colorado Front Range. We used forest structure and tree-ring fire history to characterize fire severity at 232 sites and then modeled historical fire-severity across the entire study area using biophysical variables. Eighteen (7.8%) sites were characterized by low-severity fires and 214 (92.2%) by mixed-severity fires (i.e. including moderate- or high-severity fires). Difference in area of historical versus observed low-severity fire within nine recent (post-1999) large fire perimeters was greatest in lower montane forests. Only 16% of the study area recorded a shift from historical low severity to a higher potential for crown fire today. An historical fire regime of more frequent and low-severity fires at low elevations (<2260 m) supports a convergence of management goals of ecological restoration and fire hazard mitigation in those habitats. In contrast, at higher elevations mixed-severity fires were predominant historically and continue to be so today. Thinning treatments at higher elevations of the montane zone will not return the fire regime to an historic low-severity regime, and are of questionable effectiveness in preventing severe wildfires. Based on present-day fuels, predicted fire behavior under extreme fire weather continues to indicate a mixed-severity fire regime throughout most of the montane forest zone. Recent large wildfires in the Front Range are not fundamentally different from similar events that occurred historically under extreme weather conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4175072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41750722014-10-02 Historical, Observed, and Modeled Wildfire Severity in Montane Forests of the Colorado Front Range Sherriff, Rosemary L. Platt, Rutherford V. Veblen, Thomas T. Schoennagel, Tania L. Gartner, Meredith H. PLoS One Research Article Large recent fires in the western U.S. have contributed to a perception that fire exclusion has caused an unprecedented occurrence of uncharacteristically severe fires, particularly in lower elevation dry pine forests. In the absence of long-term fire severity records, it is unknown how short-term trends compare to fire severity prior to 20(th) century fire exclusion. This study compares historical (i.e. pre-1920) fire severity with observed modern fire severity and modeled potential fire behavior across 564,413 ha of montane forests of the Colorado Front Range. We used forest structure and tree-ring fire history to characterize fire severity at 232 sites and then modeled historical fire-severity across the entire study area using biophysical variables. Eighteen (7.8%) sites were characterized by low-severity fires and 214 (92.2%) by mixed-severity fires (i.e. including moderate- or high-severity fires). Difference in area of historical versus observed low-severity fire within nine recent (post-1999) large fire perimeters was greatest in lower montane forests. Only 16% of the study area recorded a shift from historical low severity to a higher potential for crown fire today. An historical fire regime of more frequent and low-severity fires at low elevations (<2260 m) supports a convergence of management goals of ecological restoration and fire hazard mitigation in those habitats. In contrast, at higher elevations mixed-severity fires were predominant historically and continue to be so today. Thinning treatments at higher elevations of the montane zone will not return the fire regime to an historic low-severity regime, and are of questionable effectiveness in preventing severe wildfires. Based on present-day fuels, predicted fire behavior under extreme fire weather continues to indicate a mixed-severity fire regime throughout most of the montane forest zone. Recent large wildfires in the Front Range are not fundamentally different from similar events that occurred historically under extreme weather conditions. Public Library of Science 2014-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4175072/ /pubmed/25251103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106971 Text en © 2014 Sherriff et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sherriff, Rosemary L.
Platt, Rutherford V.
Veblen, Thomas T.
Schoennagel, Tania L.
Gartner, Meredith H.
Historical, Observed, and Modeled Wildfire Severity in Montane Forests of the Colorado Front Range
title Historical, Observed, and Modeled Wildfire Severity in Montane Forests of the Colorado Front Range
title_full Historical, Observed, and Modeled Wildfire Severity in Montane Forests of the Colorado Front Range
title_fullStr Historical, Observed, and Modeled Wildfire Severity in Montane Forests of the Colorado Front Range
title_full_unstemmed Historical, Observed, and Modeled Wildfire Severity in Montane Forests of the Colorado Front Range
title_short Historical, Observed, and Modeled Wildfire Severity in Montane Forests of the Colorado Front Range
title_sort historical, observed, and modeled wildfire severity in montane forests of the colorado front range
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25251103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106971
work_keys_str_mv AT sherriffrosemaryl historicalobservedandmodeledwildfireseverityinmontaneforestsofthecoloradofrontrange
AT plattrutherfordv historicalobservedandmodeledwildfireseverityinmontaneforestsofthecoloradofrontrange
AT veblenthomast historicalobservedandmodeledwildfireseverityinmontaneforestsofthecoloradofrontrange
AT schoennageltanial historicalobservedandmodeledwildfireseverityinmontaneforestsofthecoloradofrontrange
AT gartnermeredithh historicalobservedandmodeledwildfireseverityinmontaneforestsofthecoloradofrontrange