Cargando…

Antimicrobial stewardship auditing of patients reviewed by infectious diseases physicians in a tertiary university hospital

BACKGROUND: The optimal way for antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) to interact with existing infectious disease physician (IDP) services within the same institution is unknown. In our institution, IDPs and our prospective audit and feedback ASP operate independently, with occasionally differi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yeo, Chay Leng, Wu, Jia En, Chung, Gladys Wei-Teng, Chan, Douglas Su-Gin, Chen, Hui Hiong, Hsu, Li Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24176042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-2-29
_version_ 1782336446363860992
author Yeo, Chay Leng
Wu, Jia En
Chung, Gladys Wei-Teng
Chan, Douglas Su-Gin
Chen, Hui Hiong
Hsu, Li Yang
author_facet Yeo, Chay Leng
Wu, Jia En
Chung, Gladys Wei-Teng
Chan, Douglas Su-Gin
Chen, Hui Hiong
Hsu, Li Yang
author_sort Yeo, Chay Leng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal way for antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) to interact with existing infectious disease physician (IDP) services within the same institution is unknown. In our institution, IDPs and our prospective audit and feedback ASP operate independently, with occasionally differing recommendations offered for the same inpatient. We performed a retrospective audit on inpatients that had been reviewed by both IDPs and ASP within a 7-day period, focusing on cases where different therapy-modifying recommendations had been offered. We analyzed the outcomes in inpatients where the ASP recommendations were accepted and compared these with the inpatients where the IDP recommendations were accepted instead. Outcomes assessed were 30-day mortality post-ASP review, unplanned re-admission within 30 days post-discharge from hospital, and clinical deterioration at 7 days post-ASP review. FINDINGS: There were 143 (18.9%) patients where differing recommendations had been offered, with primary physicians accepting 69.9% of ASP recommendations. No significant differences in terms of demographics, clinical characteristics, 30-day mortality, and re-admission rates were observed, although clinical deterioration rates were lower in patients where the ASP recommendation was accepted (8.0% vs. 27.9%; p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, hematology-oncology inpatients were associated with unplanned readmission. Increasing age and hematology-oncology inpatients were associated with clinical deterioration 7 days post-recommendation, whereas acceptance of ASP recommendations was protective. No characteristic was independently associated with 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, independent reviews by both IDPs and ASPs can be compatible within large tertiary hospitals, providing primary physicians even in situations of conflicting recommendations viable alternative antimicrobial prescribing advice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4175095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41750952014-09-26 Antimicrobial stewardship auditing of patients reviewed by infectious diseases physicians in a tertiary university hospital Yeo, Chay Leng Wu, Jia En Chung, Gladys Wei-Teng Chan, Douglas Su-Gin Chen, Hui Hiong Hsu, Li Yang Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Short Report BACKGROUND: The optimal way for antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) to interact with existing infectious disease physician (IDP) services within the same institution is unknown. In our institution, IDPs and our prospective audit and feedback ASP operate independently, with occasionally differing recommendations offered for the same inpatient. We performed a retrospective audit on inpatients that had been reviewed by both IDPs and ASP within a 7-day period, focusing on cases where different therapy-modifying recommendations had been offered. We analyzed the outcomes in inpatients where the ASP recommendations were accepted and compared these with the inpatients where the IDP recommendations were accepted instead. Outcomes assessed were 30-day mortality post-ASP review, unplanned re-admission within 30 days post-discharge from hospital, and clinical deterioration at 7 days post-ASP review. FINDINGS: There were 143 (18.9%) patients where differing recommendations had been offered, with primary physicians accepting 69.9% of ASP recommendations. No significant differences in terms of demographics, clinical characteristics, 30-day mortality, and re-admission rates were observed, although clinical deterioration rates were lower in patients where the ASP recommendation was accepted (8.0% vs. 27.9%; p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, hematology-oncology inpatients were associated with unplanned readmission. Increasing age and hematology-oncology inpatients were associated with clinical deterioration 7 days post-recommendation, whereas acceptance of ASP recommendations was protective. No characteristic was independently associated with 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, independent reviews by both IDPs and ASPs can be compatible within large tertiary hospitals, providing primary physicians even in situations of conflicting recommendations viable alternative antimicrobial prescribing advice. BioMed Central 2013-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4175095/ /pubmed/24176042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-2-29 Text en Copyright © 2013 Yeo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Yeo, Chay Leng
Wu, Jia En
Chung, Gladys Wei-Teng
Chan, Douglas Su-Gin
Chen, Hui Hiong
Hsu, Li Yang
Antimicrobial stewardship auditing of patients reviewed by infectious diseases physicians in a tertiary university hospital
title Antimicrobial stewardship auditing of patients reviewed by infectious diseases physicians in a tertiary university hospital
title_full Antimicrobial stewardship auditing of patients reviewed by infectious diseases physicians in a tertiary university hospital
title_fullStr Antimicrobial stewardship auditing of patients reviewed by infectious diseases physicians in a tertiary university hospital
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial stewardship auditing of patients reviewed by infectious diseases physicians in a tertiary university hospital
title_short Antimicrobial stewardship auditing of patients reviewed by infectious diseases physicians in a tertiary university hospital
title_sort antimicrobial stewardship auditing of patients reviewed by infectious diseases physicians in a tertiary university hospital
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24176042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-2-29
work_keys_str_mv AT yeochayleng antimicrobialstewardshipauditingofpatientsreviewedbyinfectiousdiseasesphysiciansinatertiaryuniversityhospital
AT wujiaen antimicrobialstewardshipauditingofpatientsreviewedbyinfectiousdiseasesphysiciansinatertiaryuniversityhospital
AT chunggladysweiteng antimicrobialstewardshipauditingofpatientsreviewedbyinfectiousdiseasesphysiciansinatertiaryuniversityhospital
AT chandouglassugin antimicrobialstewardshipauditingofpatientsreviewedbyinfectiousdiseasesphysiciansinatertiaryuniversityhospital
AT chenhuihiong antimicrobialstewardshipauditingofpatientsreviewedbyinfectiousdiseasesphysiciansinatertiaryuniversityhospital
AT hsuliyang antimicrobialstewardshipauditingofpatientsreviewedbyinfectiousdiseasesphysiciansinatertiaryuniversityhospital