Cargando…
Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure Does Not Decrease in Elderly Subjects
[Purpose] Measurements of inspiratory strength are critical for detecting inspiratory muscle weakness. Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) is a quick, noninvasive measurement of global inspiratory strength; however, it is not clear how many trials are needed for reliable measurements. [Subjects...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.1509 |
_version_ | 1782336472979865600 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Chien-Hui Yang, Gee-Gwo Chen, Tung-Wei |
author_facet | Huang, Chien-Hui Yang, Gee-Gwo Chen, Tung-Wei |
author_sort | Huang, Chien-Hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Purpose] Measurements of inspiratory strength are critical for detecting inspiratory muscle weakness. Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) is a quick, noninvasive measurement of global inspiratory strength; however, it is not clear how many trials are needed for reliable measurements. [Subjects and Methods] One hundred and nineteen subjects (age 39.9±16.5, range 18–69 yrs) completed the study. They were divided into subgroups of different ages and gender. Subjects were asked to take 20 maximal sniffs after normal expiration, with 30 seconds rest in-between. The highest values among the first 10 and last 10 SNIP maneuvers were recorded as SNIP1-10, and SNIP11-20, respectively. The paired t-test was used to compare the differences. Two-way measures ANOVA was used to compare the effects of age and gender on SNIP. [Results] SNIP 11–20 was significantly greater than SNIP1–10, suggesting that 10 trials is not enough to eliminate learning effects. Age did not affect SNIP in either gender, suggesting SNIP is preserved. In stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, the SNIP values were positively related with body mass index in women and positively related with weight in men. [Conclusion] The results suggest that twenty trials are needed for reliable SNIP measurements. The mean value and lower limits of normal SNIP are provided for clinical comparison. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4175268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41752682014-09-30 Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure Does Not Decrease in Elderly Subjects Huang, Chien-Hui Yang, Gee-Gwo Chen, Tung-Wei J Phys Ther Sci Rapid publication [Purpose] Measurements of inspiratory strength are critical for detecting inspiratory muscle weakness. Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) is a quick, noninvasive measurement of global inspiratory strength; however, it is not clear how many trials are needed for reliable measurements. [Subjects and Methods] One hundred and nineteen subjects (age 39.9±16.5, range 18–69 yrs) completed the study. They were divided into subgroups of different ages and gender. Subjects were asked to take 20 maximal sniffs after normal expiration, with 30 seconds rest in-between. The highest values among the first 10 and last 10 SNIP maneuvers were recorded as SNIP1-10, and SNIP11-20, respectively. The paired t-test was used to compare the differences. Two-way measures ANOVA was used to compare the effects of age and gender on SNIP. [Results] SNIP 11–20 was significantly greater than SNIP1–10, suggesting that 10 trials is not enough to eliminate learning effects. Age did not affect SNIP in either gender, suggesting SNIP is preserved. In stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, the SNIP values were positively related with body mass index in women and positively related with weight in men. [Conclusion] The results suggest that twenty trials are needed for reliable SNIP measurements. The mean value and lower limits of normal SNIP are provided for clinical comparison. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2014-09-17 2014-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4175268/ /pubmed/25276047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.1509 Text en 2014©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. |
spellingShingle | Rapid publication Huang, Chien-Hui Yang, Gee-Gwo Chen, Tung-Wei Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure Does Not Decrease in Elderly Subjects |
title | Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure Does Not Decrease in Elderly
Subjects |
title_full | Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure Does Not Decrease in Elderly
Subjects |
title_fullStr | Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure Does Not Decrease in Elderly
Subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure Does Not Decrease in Elderly
Subjects |
title_short | Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure Does Not Decrease in Elderly
Subjects |
title_sort | sniff nasal inspiratory pressure does not decrease in elderly
subjects |
topic | Rapid publication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.1509 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangchienhui sniffnasalinspiratorypressuredoesnotdecreaseinelderlysubjects AT yanggeegwo sniffnasalinspiratorypressuredoesnotdecreaseinelderlysubjects AT chentungwei sniffnasalinspiratorypressuredoesnotdecreaseinelderlysubjects |