Cargando…

Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure Does Not Decrease in Elderly Subjects

[Purpose] Measurements of inspiratory strength are critical for detecting inspiratory muscle weakness. Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) is a quick, noninvasive measurement of global inspiratory strength; however, it is not clear how many trials are needed for reliable measurements. [Subjects...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Chien-Hui, Yang, Gee-Gwo, Chen, Tung-Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.1509
_version_ 1782336472979865600
author Huang, Chien-Hui
Yang, Gee-Gwo
Chen, Tung-Wei
author_facet Huang, Chien-Hui
Yang, Gee-Gwo
Chen, Tung-Wei
author_sort Huang, Chien-Hui
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] Measurements of inspiratory strength are critical for detecting inspiratory muscle weakness. Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) is a quick, noninvasive measurement of global inspiratory strength; however, it is not clear how many trials are needed for reliable measurements. [Subjects and Methods] One hundred and nineteen subjects (age 39.9±16.5, range 18–69 yrs) completed the study. They were divided into subgroups of different ages and gender. Subjects were asked to take 20 maximal sniffs after normal expiration, with 30 seconds rest in-between. The highest values among the first 10 and last 10 SNIP maneuvers were recorded as SNIP1-10, and SNIP11-20, respectively. The paired t-test was used to compare the differences. Two-way measures ANOVA was used to compare the effects of age and gender on SNIP. [Results] SNIP 11–20 was significantly greater than SNIP1–10, suggesting that 10 trials is not enough to eliminate learning effects. Age did not affect SNIP in either gender, suggesting SNIP is preserved. In stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, the SNIP values were positively related with body mass index in women and positively related with weight in men. [Conclusion] The results suggest that twenty trials are needed for reliable SNIP measurements. The mean value and lower limits of normal SNIP are provided for clinical comparison.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4175268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41752682014-09-30 Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure Does Not Decrease in Elderly Subjects Huang, Chien-Hui Yang, Gee-Gwo Chen, Tung-Wei J Phys Ther Sci Rapid publication [Purpose] Measurements of inspiratory strength are critical for detecting inspiratory muscle weakness. Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) is a quick, noninvasive measurement of global inspiratory strength; however, it is not clear how many trials are needed for reliable measurements. [Subjects and Methods] One hundred and nineteen subjects (age 39.9±16.5, range 18–69 yrs) completed the study. They were divided into subgroups of different ages and gender. Subjects were asked to take 20 maximal sniffs after normal expiration, with 30 seconds rest in-between. The highest values among the first 10 and last 10 SNIP maneuvers were recorded as SNIP1-10, and SNIP11-20, respectively. The paired t-test was used to compare the differences. Two-way measures ANOVA was used to compare the effects of age and gender on SNIP. [Results] SNIP 11–20 was significantly greater than SNIP1–10, suggesting that 10 trials is not enough to eliminate learning effects. Age did not affect SNIP in either gender, suggesting SNIP is preserved. In stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, the SNIP values were positively related with body mass index in women and positively related with weight in men. [Conclusion] The results suggest that twenty trials are needed for reliable SNIP measurements. The mean value and lower limits of normal SNIP are provided for clinical comparison. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2014-09-17 2014-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4175268/ /pubmed/25276047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.1509 Text en 2014©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Rapid publication
Huang, Chien-Hui
Yang, Gee-Gwo
Chen, Tung-Wei
Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure Does Not Decrease in Elderly Subjects
title Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure Does Not Decrease in Elderly Subjects
title_full Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure Does Not Decrease in Elderly Subjects
title_fullStr Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure Does Not Decrease in Elderly Subjects
title_full_unstemmed Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure Does Not Decrease in Elderly Subjects
title_short Sniff Nasal Inspiratory Pressure Does Not Decrease in Elderly Subjects
title_sort sniff nasal inspiratory pressure does not decrease in elderly subjects
topic Rapid publication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.1509
work_keys_str_mv AT huangchienhui sniffnasalinspiratorypressuredoesnotdecreaseinelderlysubjects
AT yanggeegwo sniffnasalinspiratorypressuredoesnotdecreaseinelderlysubjects
AT chentungwei sniffnasalinspiratorypressuredoesnotdecreaseinelderlysubjects