Cargando…

A comparison of clinical and surgical outcomes between laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery and traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and surgical outcomes between laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery and traditional multiport laparoscopic (TML) surgery for treatment of adnexal tumors. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for patients undergoing surgery for ben...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, In Ok, Yoon, Jung Won, Chung, Dawn, Yim, Ga Won, Nam, Eun Ji, Kim, Sunghoon, Kim, Sang Wun, Kim, Young Tae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Korean Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endocrinology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimal Invasive Surgery; Korean Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine; Korean Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology; Korean Urogynecologic Society 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25264529
http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2014.57.5.386
_version_ 1782336506269007872
author Lee, In Ok
Yoon, Jung Won
Chung, Dawn
Yim, Ga Won
Nam, Eun Ji
Kim, Sunghoon
Kim, Sang Wun
Kim, Young Tae
author_facet Lee, In Ok
Yoon, Jung Won
Chung, Dawn
Yim, Ga Won
Nam, Eun Ji
Kim, Sunghoon
Kim, Sang Wun
Kim, Young Tae
author_sort Lee, In Ok
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and surgical outcomes between laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery and traditional multiport laparoscopic (TML) surgery for treatment of adnexal tumors. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for patients undergoing surgery for benign adnexal tumors between January 2008 and April 2012 at our institution. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. Clinical and surgical outcomes for patients undergoing LESS surgery using Glove port were compared with those patients undergoing TML surgery. RESULTS: A review of 129 patient cases undergoing LESS surgery using Glove port and 100 patient cases undergoing TML surgery revealed no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of the two groups. The median operative time was shorter in the LESS group using Glove port at 44 minutes (range, 19-126 minutes) than the TML group at 49 minutes (range, 20-196 minutes) (P=0.0007). There were no significant differences between in the duration of postoperative hospital stay, change in hemoglobin levels, pain score or the rate of complications between the LESS and TML groups. CONCLUSION: LESS surgery showed comparable clinical and surgical outcomes to TML surgery, and required less operative time. Future prospective trials are warranted to further define the benefits of LESS surgery for adnexal tumor treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4175599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Korean Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endocrinology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimal Invasive Surgery; Korean Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine; Korean Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology; Korean Urogynecologic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41755992014-09-26 A comparison of clinical and surgical outcomes between laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery and traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors Lee, In Ok Yoon, Jung Won Chung, Dawn Yim, Ga Won Nam, Eun Ji Kim, Sunghoon Kim, Sang Wun Kim, Young Tae Obstet Gynecol Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and surgical outcomes between laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery and traditional multiport laparoscopic (TML) surgery for treatment of adnexal tumors. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for patients undergoing surgery for benign adnexal tumors between January 2008 and April 2012 at our institution. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. Clinical and surgical outcomes for patients undergoing LESS surgery using Glove port were compared with those patients undergoing TML surgery. RESULTS: A review of 129 patient cases undergoing LESS surgery using Glove port and 100 patient cases undergoing TML surgery revealed no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of the two groups. The median operative time was shorter in the LESS group using Glove port at 44 minutes (range, 19-126 minutes) than the TML group at 49 minutes (range, 20-196 minutes) (P=0.0007). There were no significant differences between in the duration of postoperative hospital stay, change in hemoglobin levels, pain score or the rate of complications between the LESS and TML groups. CONCLUSION: LESS surgery showed comparable clinical and surgical outcomes to TML surgery, and required less operative time. Future prospective trials are warranted to further define the benefits of LESS surgery for adnexal tumor treatment. Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Korean Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endocrinology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimal Invasive Surgery; Korean Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine; Korean Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology; Korean Urogynecologic Society 2014-09 2014-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4175599/ /pubmed/25264529 http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2014.57.5.386 Text en Copyright © 2014 Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Articles published in Obstet Gynecol Sci are open-access, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, In Ok
Yoon, Jung Won
Chung, Dawn
Yim, Ga Won
Nam, Eun Ji
Kim, Sunghoon
Kim, Sang Wun
Kim, Young Tae
A comparison of clinical and surgical outcomes between laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery and traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors
title A comparison of clinical and surgical outcomes between laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery and traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors
title_full A comparison of clinical and surgical outcomes between laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery and traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors
title_fullStr A comparison of clinical and surgical outcomes between laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery and traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of clinical and surgical outcomes between laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery and traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors
title_short A comparison of clinical and surgical outcomes between laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery and traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors
title_sort comparison of clinical and surgical outcomes between laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery and traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25264529
http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2014.57.5.386
work_keys_str_mv AT leeinok acomparisonofclinicalandsurgicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryandtraditionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexaltumors
AT yoonjungwon acomparisonofclinicalandsurgicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryandtraditionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexaltumors
AT chungdawn acomparisonofclinicalandsurgicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryandtraditionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexaltumors
AT yimgawon acomparisonofclinicalandsurgicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryandtraditionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexaltumors
AT nameunji acomparisonofclinicalandsurgicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryandtraditionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexaltumors
AT kimsunghoon acomparisonofclinicalandsurgicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryandtraditionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexaltumors
AT kimsangwun acomparisonofclinicalandsurgicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryandtraditionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexaltumors
AT kimyoungtae acomparisonofclinicalandsurgicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryandtraditionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexaltumors
AT leeinok comparisonofclinicalandsurgicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryandtraditionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexaltumors
AT yoonjungwon comparisonofclinicalandsurgicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryandtraditionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexaltumors
AT chungdawn comparisonofclinicalandsurgicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryandtraditionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexaltumors
AT yimgawon comparisonofclinicalandsurgicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryandtraditionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexaltumors
AT nameunji comparisonofclinicalandsurgicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryandtraditionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexaltumors
AT kimsunghoon comparisonofclinicalandsurgicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryandtraditionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexaltumors
AT kimsangwun comparisonofclinicalandsurgicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryandtraditionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexaltumors
AT kimyoungtae comparisonofclinicalandsurgicaloutcomesbetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryandtraditionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforadnexaltumors