Cargando…

A retrospective planning analysis comparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using two optimization algorithms for the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of this study is to compare intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for the radical treatment of prostate cancer using version 10.0 (v10.0) of Varian Medical Systems, RapidArc radiation oncology system. Particular focus wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elith, Craig A, Dempsey, Shane E, Warren-Forward, Helen M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.22
_version_ 1782336532175126528
author Elith, Craig A
Dempsey, Shane E
Warren-Forward, Helen M
author_facet Elith, Craig A
Dempsey, Shane E
Warren-Forward, Helen M
author_sort Elith, Craig A
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of this study is to compare intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for the radical treatment of prostate cancer using version 10.0 (v10.0) of Varian Medical Systems, RapidArc radiation oncology system. Particular focus was placed on plan quality and the implications on departmental resources. The secondary objective was to compare the results in v10.0 to the preceding version 8.6 (v8.6). METHODS: Twenty prostate cancer cases were retrospectively planned using v10.0 of Varian's Eclipse and RapidArc software. Three planning techniques were performed: a 5-field IMRT, VMAT using one arc (VMAT-1A), and VMAT with two arcs (VMAT-2A). Plan quality was assessed by examining homogeneity, conformity, the number of monitor units (MUs) utilized, and dose to the organs at risk (OAR). Resource implications were assessed by examining planning and treatment times. The results obtained using v10.0 were also compared to those previously reported by our group for v8.6. RESULTS: In v10.0, each technique was able to produce a dose distribution that achieved the departmental planning guidelines. The IMRT plans were produced faster than VMAT plans and displayed improved homogeneity. The VMAT plans provided better conformity to the target volume, improved dose to the OAR, and required fewer MUs. Treatments using VMAT-1A were significantly faster than both IMRT and VMAT-2A. Comparison between versions 8.6 and 10.0 revealed that in the newer version, VMAT planning was significantly faster and the quality of the VMAT dose distributions produced were of a better quality. CONCLUSION: VMAT (v10.0) using one or two arcs provides an acceptable alternative to IMRT for the treatment of prostate cancer. VMAT-1A has the greatest impact on reducing treatment time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4175809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41758092014-09-30 A retrospective planning analysis comparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using two optimization algorithms for the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer Elith, Craig A Dempsey, Shane E Warren-Forward, Helen M J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of this study is to compare intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for the radical treatment of prostate cancer using version 10.0 (v10.0) of Varian Medical Systems, RapidArc radiation oncology system. Particular focus was placed on plan quality and the implications on departmental resources. The secondary objective was to compare the results in v10.0 to the preceding version 8.6 (v8.6). METHODS: Twenty prostate cancer cases were retrospectively planned using v10.0 of Varian's Eclipse and RapidArc software. Three planning techniques were performed: a 5-field IMRT, VMAT using one arc (VMAT-1A), and VMAT with two arcs (VMAT-2A). Plan quality was assessed by examining homogeneity, conformity, the number of monitor units (MUs) utilized, and dose to the organs at risk (OAR). Resource implications were assessed by examining planning and treatment times. The results obtained using v10.0 were also compared to those previously reported by our group for v8.6. RESULTS: In v10.0, each technique was able to produce a dose distribution that achieved the departmental planning guidelines. The IMRT plans were produced faster than VMAT plans and displayed improved homogeneity. The VMAT plans provided better conformity to the target volume, improved dose to the OAR, and required fewer MUs. Treatments using VMAT-1A were significantly faster than both IMRT and VMAT-2A. Comparison between versions 8.6 and 10.0 revealed that in the newer version, VMAT planning was significantly faster and the quality of the VMAT dose distributions produced were of a better quality. CONCLUSION: VMAT (v10.0) using one or two arcs provides an acceptable alternative to IMRT for the treatment of prostate cancer. VMAT-1A has the greatest impact on reducing treatment time. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-09 2013-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4175809/ /pubmed/26229615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.22 Text en © 2013 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Australian Institute of Radiography and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Elith, Craig A
Dempsey, Shane E
Warren-Forward, Helen M
A retrospective planning analysis comparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using two optimization algorithms for the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer
title A retrospective planning analysis comparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using two optimization algorithms for the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer
title_full A retrospective planning analysis comparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using two optimization algorithms for the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer
title_fullStr A retrospective planning analysis comparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using two optimization algorithms for the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective planning analysis comparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using two optimization algorithms for the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer
title_short A retrospective planning analysis comparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using two optimization algorithms for the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer
title_sort retrospective planning analysis comparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (imrt) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (vmat) using two optimization algorithms for the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.22
work_keys_str_mv AT elithcraiga aretrospectiveplanninganalysiscomparingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrttovolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatusingtwooptimizationalgorithmsforthetreatmentofearlystageprostatecancer
AT dempseyshanee aretrospectiveplanninganalysiscomparingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrttovolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatusingtwooptimizationalgorithmsforthetreatmentofearlystageprostatecancer
AT warrenforwardhelenm aretrospectiveplanninganalysiscomparingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrttovolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatusingtwooptimizationalgorithmsforthetreatmentofearlystageprostatecancer
AT elithcraiga retrospectiveplanninganalysiscomparingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrttovolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatusingtwooptimizationalgorithmsforthetreatmentofearlystageprostatecancer
AT dempseyshanee retrospectiveplanninganalysiscomparingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrttovolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatusingtwooptimizationalgorithmsforthetreatmentofearlystageprostatecancer
AT warrenforwardhelenm retrospectiveplanninganalysiscomparingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrttovolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmatusingtwooptimizationalgorithmsforthetreatmentofearlystageprostatecancer