Cargando…
Hip spica versus Rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children
BACKGROUND: Femoral fractures are common in children between 2 and 12 years of age and 75% of the lesions affect the femoral shaft. Traction followed by a plaster cast is universally accepted as conservative treatment. We compared primary hip spica with closed reduction and fixation with retrogradel...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25298556 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.139860 |
_version_ | 1782336544872333312 |
---|---|
author | Ruhullah, Mohammad Singh, Hare Ram Shah, Sanjay Shrestha, Dipak |
author_facet | Ruhullah, Mohammad Singh, Hare Ram Shah, Sanjay Shrestha, Dipak |
author_sort | Ruhullah, Mohammad |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Femoral fractures are common in children between 2 and 12 years of age and 75% of the lesions affect the femoral shaft. Traction followed by a plaster cast is universally accepted as conservative treatment. We compared primary hip spica with closed reduction and fixation with retrogradely passed crossed Rush pins for diaphyseal femur fracture in children. The hypothesis was that Rush pin might provide better treatment with good clinical results in comparison with primary hip spica. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty children with femoral fractures were evaluated; 25 of them underwent conservative treatment using immediate hip spica (group A) and 25 were treated with crossed retrograde Rush pins (group B). The patients ages ranged from 3 to 13 years (mean of 9 years). RESULTS: Mean duration of fracture union was 15 weeks in group A and 12 weeks in group B. Mean duration of weight bearing 14 weeks in group and 7 weeks in group B. Mean hospital stay was 4 days in group A and 8 days in group B. Mean followup period in group A was 16 months and group B was 17 months. Complications such as angulation, shortening, infection were compared. CONCLUSIONS: Closed reduction and internal fixation with crossed Rush pins was superior in terms of early weight bearing and restoration of normal anatomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4175863 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41758632014-10-08 Hip spica versus Rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children Ruhullah, Mohammad Singh, Hare Ram Shah, Sanjay Shrestha, Dipak Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Femoral fractures are common in children between 2 and 12 years of age and 75% of the lesions affect the femoral shaft. Traction followed by a plaster cast is universally accepted as conservative treatment. We compared primary hip spica with closed reduction and fixation with retrogradely passed crossed Rush pins for diaphyseal femur fracture in children. The hypothesis was that Rush pin might provide better treatment with good clinical results in comparison with primary hip spica. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty children with femoral fractures were evaluated; 25 of them underwent conservative treatment using immediate hip spica (group A) and 25 were treated with crossed retrograde Rush pins (group B). The patients ages ranged from 3 to 13 years (mean of 9 years). RESULTS: Mean duration of fracture union was 15 weeks in group A and 12 weeks in group B. Mean duration of weight bearing 14 weeks in group and 7 weeks in group B. Mean hospital stay was 4 days in group A and 8 days in group B. Mean followup period in group A was 16 months and group B was 17 months. Complications such as angulation, shortening, infection were compared. CONCLUSIONS: Closed reduction and internal fixation with crossed Rush pins was superior in terms of early weight bearing and restoration of normal anatomy. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4175863/ /pubmed/25298556 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.139860 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ruhullah, Mohammad Singh, Hare Ram Shah, Sanjay Shrestha, Dipak Hip spica versus Rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children |
title | Hip spica versus Rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children |
title_full | Hip spica versus Rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children |
title_fullStr | Hip spica versus Rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children |
title_full_unstemmed | Hip spica versus Rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children |
title_short | Hip spica versus Rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children |
title_sort | hip spica versus rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25298556 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.139860 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruhullahmohammad hipspicaversusrushpinsformanagementoffemoraldiaphysealfracturesinchildren AT singhhareram hipspicaversusrushpinsformanagementoffemoraldiaphysealfracturesinchildren AT shahsanjay hipspicaversusrushpinsformanagementoffemoraldiaphysealfracturesinchildren AT shresthadipak hipspicaversusrushpinsformanagementoffemoraldiaphysealfracturesinchildren |