Cargando…

Hip spica versus Rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children

BACKGROUND: Femoral fractures are common in children between 2 and 12 years of age and 75% of the lesions affect the femoral shaft. Traction followed by a plaster cast is universally accepted as conservative treatment. We compared primary hip spica with closed reduction and fixation with retrogradel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruhullah, Mohammad, Singh, Hare Ram, Shah, Sanjay, Shrestha, Dipak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25298556
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.139860
_version_ 1782336544872333312
author Ruhullah, Mohammad
Singh, Hare Ram
Shah, Sanjay
Shrestha, Dipak
author_facet Ruhullah, Mohammad
Singh, Hare Ram
Shah, Sanjay
Shrestha, Dipak
author_sort Ruhullah, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Femoral fractures are common in children between 2 and 12 years of age and 75% of the lesions affect the femoral shaft. Traction followed by a plaster cast is universally accepted as conservative treatment. We compared primary hip spica with closed reduction and fixation with retrogradely passed crossed Rush pins for diaphyseal femur fracture in children. The hypothesis was that Rush pin might provide better treatment with good clinical results in comparison with primary hip spica. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty children with femoral fractures were evaluated; 25 of them underwent conservative treatment using immediate hip spica (group A) and 25 were treated with crossed retrograde Rush pins (group B). The patients ages ranged from 3 to 13 years (mean of 9 years). RESULTS: Mean duration of fracture union was 15 weeks in group A and 12 weeks in group B. Mean duration of weight bearing 14 weeks in group and 7 weeks in group B. Mean hospital stay was 4 days in group A and 8 days in group B. Mean followup period in group A was 16 months and group B was 17 months. Complications such as angulation, shortening, infection were compared. CONCLUSIONS: Closed reduction and internal fixation with crossed Rush pins was superior in terms of early weight bearing and restoration of normal anatomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4175863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41758632014-10-08 Hip spica versus Rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children Ruhullah, Mohammad Singh, Hare Ram Shah, Sanjay Shrestha, Dipak Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Femoral fractures are common in children between 2 and 12 years of age and 75% of the lesions affect the femoral shaft. Traction followed by a plaster cast is universally accepted as conservative treatment. We compared primary hip spica with closed reduction and fixation with retrogradely passed crossed Rush pins for diaphyseal femur fracture in children. The hypothesis was that Rush pin might provide better treatment with good clinical results in comparison with primary hip spica. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty children with femoral fractures were evaluated; 25 of them underwent conservative treatment using immediate hip spica (group A) and 25 were treated with crossed retrograde Rush pins (group B). The patients ages ranged from 3 to 13 years (mean of 9 years). RESULTS: Mean duration of fracture union was 15 weeks in group A and 12 weeks in group B. Mean duration of weight bearing 14 weeks in group and 7 weeks in group B. Mean hospital stay was 4 days in group A and 8 days in group B. Mean followup period in group A was 16 months and group B was 17 months. Complications such as angulation, shortening, infection were compared. CONCLUSIONS: Closed reduction and internal fixation with crossed Rush pins was superior in terms of early weight bearing and restoration of normal anatomy. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4175863/ /pubmed/25298556 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.139860 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ruhullah, Mohammad
Singh, Hare Ram
Shah, Sanjay
Shrestha, Dipak
Hip spica versus Rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children
title Hip spica versus Rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children
title_full Hip spica versus Rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children
title_fullStr Hip spica versus Rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children
title_full_unstemmed Hip spica versus Rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children
title_short Hip spica versus Rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children
title_sort hip spica versus rush pins for management of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4175863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25298556
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.139860
work_keys_str_mv AT ruhullahmohammad hipspicaversusrushpinsformanagementoffemoraldiaphysealfracturesinchildren
AT singhhareram hipspicaversusrushpinsformanagementoffemoraldiaphysealfracturesinchildren
AT shahsanjay hipspicaversusrushpinsformanagementoffemoraldiaphysealfracturesinchildren
AT shresthadipak hipspicaversusrushpinsformanagementoffemoraldiaphysealfracturesinchildren